Citation

Munoz-Couselo E, Hughes BGM, Mortier L, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, et al. (2024) Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study. Int Arch Addict Res Med 9:041. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3631/1510041

Poster | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2474-3631/1510041

Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study

Munoz-Couselo E1, Hughes BGM2, Mortier L3, Grob JJ4, Gutzmer R5, Roshdy O6, González Mendoza R7*, Schachter J8, Arance A9, Grange F10, Meyer N11, Joshi A12, Billan S13, Ojavee SE14, Yuan J14, Gumuscu B14 and Bratland Å15

1Hospital Vall d’Hebron and Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

2Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, and University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France

4Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France

5Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany

6Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

7Centro Estatal de Cancerologíade Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico

8Sheba Medical Center-Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel

9Hospital Clínici Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

10Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims-Hôpital Robert Debre, Reims, France

11Institut Universitaire du Cancer and CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

12Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia

13Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

14Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA

15Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway

Background

• Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second common non-melanoma skin cancer and primarily treated with surgical resection [1]

• Patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic cSCC may not be candidates for curative surgery or radiation, and long-term prognosis is poor for metastatic disease [1-3]

• Pembrolizumab monotherapy is approved in certain countries, including the US, for treatment of LA or recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cSCC not amenable to surgery based on results from the open-label phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 trial (NCT03284424) [4]

○ Objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (95% CI, 36.1-63.9) with 9 (16.7%) complete responses (CRs) in the LA cohort and 35.2% (95%CI, 26.2-45.2) with 11 (10.5%) CRs in the R/M cohort

○ 69.2% of patients in the total population experienced a treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 11.9% experienced a grade 3-5 treatment-related event

Objective

• Present updated efficacy and safety results for pembrolizumab in LA and R/M cohorts of KEYNOTE-629 with an additional 38 months of follow-up

Methods

Figure 1

Figure 1: Study design.
ECOG PS: Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status; IV: Intravenously; Q3W, every 3 weeks. aPatients who discontinued treatment after achieving complete response may be eligible to receive an additional 17 cycles of pembrolizumab if disease progression occurred. View Figure 1

Statistical analysis

• Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment

• The primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR)

• The secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR; defined as CR + partial response (PR) + stable disease ≥ 12 weeks), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety

• DOR was assessed in all patients with a confirmed CR or PR

• 95% CIs for ORR and DCR were calculated using the exact binomial Clopper-Pearson method

• Event rates over time for DOR, PFS, and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method

Results

• Median time from first dose to the data cutoff date of September 13, 2023, was 52.4 months (range, 47.6-56.9) for the LA cohort, 64.7 months (range, 62.1-69.5) for the R/M cohort, and 63.1 months (range, 47.6-69.5) in the total population (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

Figure 2: Patient disposition.
PD: Progressive Disease View Figure 2

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier estimates of DOR in patients with a confirmed response per RECIST v1.1 by BICR in the LA cSCC cohort, R/M cSCC cohort, and total population. View Figure 3

Figure 4: Duration of treatment and time to response in patients with a confirmed response per RECIST v1.1 by BICR in the (A) LAcSCC cohort and the (B) R/M cSCC cohort. View Figure 4

Figure 5: Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and (B) OS in the LA cSCC cohort, R/M cSCC cohort, and total population.
NR: Not Reached View Figure 5

Table 1: Baseline characteristics. View Table 1

Table 2: ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. View Table 2

Table 3: AE summary. View Table 3

Conclusions

• With an additional 38 months of follow-up (median follow-up 63.1 months in the total population), pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity in patients with LA or R/M cSCC

• In the current analysis, ORR, median PFS, and median OS are consistent with the initial analysis at a median time from first dose to data cutoff of approximately 15 months [4]

• One additional patient in the LA cohort achieved a CR since the last data cutoff

• Responses were durable, with a median DOR of 52.5 months and 61.2% of responders in the total population having extended responses that lasted ≥ 36 months

• The safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab remained manageable

• These findings continue to support the use of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with LA or R/McSCC

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and their families and all investigators and site personnel. Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Maxwell Chang, BSc Hons, and Robert Steger, PhD, of Apothe Com (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Funding for this research was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Contact Information

Contact the author at emunoz@vhio.netfor questions and comments.

Copies of this poster obtained through Quick Response (QR) Code are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without permission from ASCO ® and the author of this poster.

Presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting; Chicago, Illinois; May 31-June 4, 2024.

Copyright © 2024Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

References

  1. Caudill J, Thomas JE, Burkhart CG (2023) The risk of metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Int J Dermatol 62: 483-486.
  2. Claveau J, Archambault J, Ernst DS, Giacomantonio C, Limacher JJ, et al. (2020) Multidisciplinary management of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol 27: e399-e407.
  3. Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, et al. (2023) European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 193: 113252.
  4. Hughes BGM, Munoz-Couselo E, Mortier L, Bratland Å, Gutzmer R, et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab for locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-629 study): An open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 32: 1276-1285.

Citation

Munoz-Couselo E, Hughes BGM, Mortier L, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, et al. (2024) Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the Phase 2 Keynote-629 Study. Int Arch Addict Res Med 9:041. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3631/1510041