Table 2: Articles selection results.
|
Authors |
Year |
Journal |
Article |
Surgical technique |
Dentofacial deformities |
Average age |
1 |
Wolford, et al. [15] |
2001 |
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop |
Review |
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Inverted “L” Osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy High condylectomy Anterior mandibular osteotomy Mandibular body osteotomy Genioplasty |
Mandibular hypoplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Anterior mandibular dentoalveolar deformities Condilar hyperplasia
|
-- |
2 |
Wolford, et al. [12] |
2001 |
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop |
Review |
Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy |
Maxillary osteotomy Sagittal maxillary excess Vertical maxillary hyperplasia
|
-- |
3 |
Villegas, et al. [6] |
2010 |
J Clin Orthod |
Case series |
Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy High condylectomy Genioplasty |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia
|
Girls: 13.5 years |
4 |
Capelli, et al. [7] |
2012 |
Dental Press J Orthod |
Case series |
Le Fort I osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy |
Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia
|
Doesn’t specify |
5 |
Huang, et al. [21] |
1982 |
Am J Orthod |
Observational |
Vertical ramus osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy Genioplasty |
Mandibular hypoplasia |
Boys: 14.1 years Girls: 13.4 years |
6 |
Proffit, et al. [18] |
2010 |
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg |
Observational |
Doesn’t specify |
Mandibular hypoplasia
|
Boys: 17.5 years Girls: 15 years |
7 |
Washburn, et al. [13] |
1982 |
J Oral Maxillofac Surg |
Observational |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
14.2 years |
8 |
Mogavero, et al. [14] |
1997 |
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop |
Clinical Trial |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
14.5 years |
9 |
Mojdehi, et al. [4] |
2001 |
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop |
Observational |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
12.8 years |
10 |
Marangoni, et al. [22] |
2016 |
J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg |
Observational |
Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Genioplasty |
Maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hyperplasia |
14.5 years |
11 |
Wolford, et al. [17] |
1979 |
J Maxillofac Surg |
Observational |
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy |
Mandibular hypoplasia |
13.5 years |
12 |
Precious, et al. [23] |
1985 |
Int J Oral Surg |
Observational |
Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy Mandibular body osteotomy Anterior mandibular subapical osteotomy Coronoidectomy |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia Sagittal maxillary excess |
13.9 years |
13 |
O’Keefe, et al. [9] |
2016 |
J Irish Dent Assoc |
Case report |
Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy |
Maxillary hypoplasia Mandibular hyperplasia |
15.5 years |
14 |
Schendel, et al. [16] |
1978 |
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol |
Observational |
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy |
Mandibular hypoplasia |
13.5 years |
15 |
Wolford, et al. [5] |
2009 |
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) |
Observational |
Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy High condylectomy |
Condylar hyperplasia |
Group 1: 17.5 years Group 2: 16.6 years |
16 |
Bodine, et al. [19] |
2016 |
Progress in Orthodontics |
Observational |
Doesn’t Specify |
Adolescent internal condylary resorption |
15.2 years |
17 |
Hedge, et al. [8] |
2012 |
Kathmandu Univ Med J |
Case report |
Anterior maxillary osteotomy |
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
Boys: 14 years |
18 |
Galiano, et al. [20] |
2017 |
CRANIO® |
Observational |
Doesn’t specify |
Adolescent internal condylary resorption |
16.5 years |
Anomaly |
Concomitant anomaly |
Growth rate |
Surgical technique |
Considerations |
|
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
--- |
Increased |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Sagittal growth inhibition |
|
Anterior maxillary osteotomy |
Favorable vertical growth pattern |
||||
Increased |
Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy |
Favorable vertical growth pattern |
|||
Sagittal growth with possible few alterations |
|||||
Sagittal maxillary excess |
--- |
Increased |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Sagittal growth inhibition |
|
A skeletal class III could be developed post-surgery |
|||||
Increased |
Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy |
|
|||
Sagittal growth with possible few alterations |
|||||
Election technique in these cases |
|||||
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
Increased |
Le Fort I osteotomy |
Favorable vertical growth pattern |
||
Sagittal growth inhibition |
|||||
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia |
Increased |
Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy |
Favorable vertical growth pattern |
||
Sagittal growth with possible few alterations |
|||||
Maxillary hypoplasia |
--- |
Decreased |
Le Fort I osteotomy with overcorrection |
A second surgery will probably be necessary at the end of growth |
|
Skeletal class III relapse |
|||||
Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible |
|||||
--- |
Decreased |
Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy with overcorrection |
Due to sagittal growth deficit, a second surgery will probably be necessary |
||
Skeletal class III relapse |
|||||
Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible |
|||||
Mandibular hyperplasia |
Increased/decreased |
Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + high condylectomy |
Vertical mandibular growth inhibited in most part |
||
Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible |
|||||
Mandibular hyperplasia |
--- |
Normal |
Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy |
Unaltered post-surgical mandibular growth |
|
Increased |
BSSO + high condylectomy |
Most of mandibular growth inhibited. |
|||
It can be simultaneous with the high condylectomy. |
|||||
At first a high condylectomy and in a second surgical time perform the orthognathic surgery |
|||||
Maxillary hypoplasia |
Normal |
Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + high condylectomy |
Mandibular and sagittal maxillary growth inhibited with post-surgical stability |
||
Mandibular hypoplasia |
--- |
Normal |
Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy + genioplasty |
Mandibular post-surgical growth unaltered. |
|
--- |
Decreased |
Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy + genioplasty |
Another surgery will probably be necessary due to mandibular growth deficit |
||
Adolescent internal condylar resorption |
Normal |
Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + removal of bilaminar tissues and disc reposition |
No post-surgical mandibular growth alterations. Stability in the long term. |