Table 6: Select simulation results with unequal allocation.

True HR

SS

Ctrl med

Alloc. ratio

Percent censored

Bias

ASE

ESD

Med HR

Proportion of HR

< 0.5

< 0.4

< 0.3

1

100

12

1:1

25.7

0.0028

0.2338

0.2360

1.00

0.0022

0.0002

0.0000

 

2:1

25.7

0.0007

0.2494

0.2495

1.00

0.0020

0.0000

0.0000

24

1:1

50.4

-0.0035

0.2875

0.2902

1.00

0.0112

0.0020

0.0000

 

2:1

49.4

0.0056

0.3070

0.3092

1.00

0.0116

0.0008

0.0000

50

12

1:1

26.0

-0.0099

0.3341

0.3357

0.99

0.0198

0.0036

0.0002

 

2:1

25.7

0.0027

0.3506

0.3582

1.00

0.0246

0.0056

0.0008

24

1:1

50.8

-0.0062

0.4136

0.4207

1.00

0.0520

0.0162

0.0030

 

2:1

50.6

0.0218

0.4354

0.4420

1.01

0.0482

0.0146

0.0018

0.7

100

12

1:1

32.0

-0.0053

0.2461

0.2436

0.70

0.0874

0.0136

0.0006

 

2:1

34.1

-0.0052

0.2583

0.2627

0.70

0.0976

0.0174

0.0012

24

1:1

56.2

-0.0105

0.3095

0.3084

0.69

0.1436

0.0408

0.0056

 

2:1

58.1

0.0042

0.3230

0.3220

0.70

0.1458

0.0366

0.0036

50

12

1:1

32.2

-0.0100

0.3518

0.3592

0.70

0.1784

0.0644

0.0088

 

2:1

34.5

-0.0109

0.3638

0.3613

0.69

0.1834

0.0622

0.0108

24

1:1

56.4

-0.0138

0.4466

0.4621

0.70

0.2320

0.1110

0.0402

 

2:1

58.0

0.0037

0.4569

0.4640

0.70

0.2268

0.1084

0.0320

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For allocation ratio 2:1, sample sizes considered were n = 99 and n = 51 respectively.