Table 4: pWLHIV and providing cART.
Variables |
Total |
Initiation
of cART |
PRR |
95% CI |
p |
||
Same day |
More than a day |
% Same day |
|||||
LHC profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001 |
Urban |
366 |
133 |
232 |
36.3 |
1 |
|
|
Rural |
203 |
148 |
55 |
72.9 |
2.0 |
1.7-2.3 |
|
Age of pWLHIV (in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001 |
<
20 |
89 |
30 |
59 |
33.7 |
1 |
|
|
20-29 |
267 |
127 |
140 |
47.6 |
1.4 |
1.1-1.9 |
|
30-39 |
192 |
121 |
71 |
63.0 |
1.9 |
1.4-2.6 |
|
>
39 |
21 |
3 |
18 |
14.3 |
0.4 |
0.1-1.3 |
|
Education |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001 |
No
formal education |
15 |
4 |
11 |
26.7 |
1 |
|
|
Primary
level |
83 |
47 |
35 |
56.6 |
2.1 |
0.9-5.1 |
|
Some
secondary level |
245 |
95 |
143 |
38.8 |
1.5 |
0.6
- 3.5 |
|
Secondary
graduate |
173 |
96 |
75 |
55.5 |
2.1 |
1.1
- 4.9 |
|
Tertiary
level |
68 |
39 |
24 |
57.4 |
2.3 |
1.1
- 5.5 |
|
Mariage status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001 |
Never
married |
170 |
76 |
94 |
44.7 |
1 |
|
|
Married |
361 |
198 |
163 |
54.8 |
1.2 |
1.1
- 1.5 |
|
Widowed |
38 |
7 |
31 |
18.4 |
0.4 |
0.2
- 0.8 |
|
Number of women who served at the site with cART
prescribers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001 |
One
cART prescriber at site |
217 |
177 |
40 |
81.6 |
1 |
|
|
Two
cART prescribers at site |
161 |
56 |
105 |
34.8 |
0.4 |
0.3
- 0.5 |
|
Three
cART prescribers at site |
168 |
45 |
123 |
26.8 |
0.3 |
0.2
- 0.4 |
|
>
three cART
prescribers at site |
23 |
3 |
20 |
13.0 |
0.2 |
0.1
- 0.5 |
|
Liver &kidney function tests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<
0.001† |
Samples
not collected |
196 |
187 |
9 |
95.4 |
1 |
|
|
Results
available within 2 weeks |
127 |
36 |
91 |
28.3 |
0.3 |
0.2
- 0.4 |
|
Results
available in a month |
141 |
54 |
87 |
38.3 |
0.4 |
0.3
- 0.5 |
|
Results
available after a month |
105 |
4 |
101 |
3.8 |
0.03 |
0.01
- 0.1 |
|
PRR: prevalence risk
ratio; †: Chi-square test and trend