Table 3: Logistic regression model on decision making characteristics of the study sample for individual women's data (n = 1308).
Variable |
|
Incremental Effect |
95% confidence interval |
p-value |
|
|
|
|
Lower bound |
Upper bound |
|
Age |
15-24 - ref |
|
|
|
|
|
25-29 |
0.0137305 |
-0.0428794 |
0.0703404 |
0.635 |
|
30-34 |
0.0499299 |
-0.0034563 |
0.1033161 |
0.067 |
|
35-39 |
0.0488583 |
-0.0084567 |
0.1061733 |
0.095 |
|
40-44 |
0.050331 |
-0.0118615 |
0.1125235 |
0.113 |
|
45-49 |
0.0795627 |
0.0082868 |
0.1508386 |
0.029 |
Education status |
No education -ref |
|
|
|
|
|
Any education |
0.0589362 |
0.0074993 |
0.1103731 |
0.025 |
Literacy |
Cannot read at all-ref |
|
|
|
|
|
Able to read only partial |
0.0374329 |
-0.0231827 |
0.0980485 |
0.226 |
|
Able to read whole sentence |
0.0575859 |
0.0076561 |
0.1075158 |
0.024 |
Wealth index |
Poorest - ref |
|
|
|
|
|
poorer |
0.0214799 |
-0.0502267 |
0.0931866 |
0.557 |
|
Middle |
0.068564 |
0.0028001 |
0.1343279 |
0.041 |
|
Richer |
0.093165 |
.0266414 |
0.1596886 |
0.006 |
|
Richest |
0.1636425 |
0.0967245 |
0.2305605 |
0.000 |
Decision making score |
0 - ref |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.0121508 |
-0.052156 |
0.0764577 |
0.711 |
|
2 |
-0.0047259 |
-0.0778918 |
0.06844 |
0.899 |
|
3 |
-0.0477056 |
-0.1459398 |
0.0505285 |
0.341 |
|
4 |
-0.0244915 |
-0.1231535 |
0.0741704 |
0.627 |
|
5 |
-0.0066096 |
-0.1043342 |
0.0911151 |
0.895 |
|
Other |
0.0441662 |
-0.0272239 |
0.1155563 |
0.225 |
Big city |
Not a big city – ref |
|
|
|
|
|
Big city |
0.0206085 |
-0.0134551 |
.054672 |
0.236 |
Note: Ethnicity also NS; NS: Not statistically significant.