Join Us | Latest Articles | Contact

Journal Home


Editorial Board


Archive


Submit to this journal


Current issue

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Treatment





DOI: 10.23937/2469-584X/1510015



Diagnosis and Management of Helicobacter pylori

Uni Wong and Leon P McLean*


Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA


*Corresponding author: Leon P McLean, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 100 North Greene Street, Lower Level, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA, Tel: 410 706-3387, Fax: 410 706-4330, E-mail: lmclean@medicine.umaryland.edu
J Clin Gastroenterol Treat, JCGT-2-015, (Volume 2, Issue 1), Original Article; ISSN: 2469-584X
Received: January 03, 2015 | Accepted: February 08, 2016 | Published: February 11, 2016
Citation: Wong U, McLean LP (2016) Diagnosis and Management of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Gastroenterol Treat 2:015. 10.23937/2469-584X/1510015
Copyright: © 2016 Wong U, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Summary

Helicobacter pylori is a common infection linked to dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, gastric cancer, and MALT lymphoma. Endoscopic and nonendoscopic options may be used to diagnose H. pylori and confirm its eradication. Fourteen days of triple or quadruple therapy may be used as initial therapy, although clarithromycin-based triple therapy has become less effective over time. Quadruple therapy or sequential therapy have been increasingly utilized. Previously prescribed antibiotics should be avoided in management of persistent H. pylori infection. Eradication should be confirmed in patients with peptic ulcer disease, MALT lymphoma, or gastric cancer.


Keywords

Helicobacter pylori, Peptic ulcer disease, MALT lymphoma, Gastric cancer, Dyspepsia, Triple therapy, Quadruple therapy, Sequential therapy


Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a common bacterial infection, affecting up to 40% of the United States (US) population [1] with up to two-thirds of the world population infected [2]. H. pylori has been linked to a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) conditions including gastritis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and gastric cancer [3]. In fact, it is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer due to its association with gastric cancer [4]. Interestingly, although it is a carcinogen, H. pylori may be protective against esophageal adenocarcinoma [5-9].

H. pylori is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped, pathogenic bacterium that resides within the mucus layer that coats the gastric mucosa [1]. The bacterium was first isolated by Robin Warren and Barry Marshall in 1982 [10]. It was originally called Campylobacter pylori, but was later renamed Helicobacter pylori. H. pylori is microaerophilic, surviving in the presence of relatively low oxygen tension [11]. It is also able to tolerate the acidic environment of the stomach through production of ureases, which catalyze a chemical reaction producing ammonia that surrounds the organism [1]. The ammonia produced neutralizes the acid environment around the bacterium, allowing it to survive within the stomach.

H. pylori eradication is typically advised in cases where infection is confirmed. Classic triple-therapy, utilizing clarithromycin and amoxicillin in conjunction with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), has become less effective over time [12,13]. Prolonged courses of therapy, quadruple-therapy, and/or sequential therapy may be required for eradication [14]. Confirmation of eradication is advised in certain clinical scenarios, such as PUD, MALT lymphoma, and in patients with gastric cancer [14].

The following manuscript discusses the epidemiology of and risk factors for H. pylori infection. We also discuss its clinical significance, strategies for diagnosis, and current treatment options.


Epidemiology

Although H. pylori infection is common, the precise mechanism underlying its transmission is not definitively established. Suggested methods of transmission include ingestion of contaminated water [15], fecal-oral means [16], and even periodontal pockets serving as a reservoir [17]. Other possibilities include transmission by flies [18,19], iatrogenic spread with unsterile endoscopes [18,20] and use of pH probes [18]. Most children in developing countries are infected before age 10, but in the US and other developed countries infection more commonly occurs in adulthood [1]. H. pylori infection is less common in developed countries with a prevalence of approximately 20-30% [21]. In developing countries disease burden is higher with prevalence rates approaching 90% [21].

Demographic variation exists in H. pylori infection within the US population [1]. In a cross-sectional study of 1200 Veterans Affairs patients between 40 and 80 years of age who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with gastric biopsies, H. pylori infection was more common in Hispanics (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.0; 95% CI 1.7 - 5.3) and African Americans (adjusted OR 2.6; 95% CI 0.2 - 0.9) than in non-Hispanic whites [22]. Similarly, African American and Hispanic military personnel have higher rates of H. pylori seropositivity at 44% and 38%, respectively, compared to their Caucasian counterparts at 14% (p < 0.05) [23]. The higher prevalence of H. pylori seropositivity in African Americans and Hispanics may be driven by socioeconomic factors such as income, education, household crowding, and birth outside of the US [24,25].

Males have a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection than females. In a cross-sectional study of 556 healthy adults between 20 and 30 years of age, males were twice as likely to have antibodies against H. pylori than females (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.1) across all strata of age, race, education, and household income [25]. These findings were confirmed in a meta-analysis examining 18 population-based studies, with a combined OR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.2) [26]. Whether males are more susceptible to infection with H. pylori remains unclear. It is also possible that males are exposed to H. pylori more often or that the immune system in females is more effective at preventing or clearing H. pylori.


Risk factors

Smoking: It is possible that a relationship between H. pylori infection and smoking exists. In case-control studies, subjects who were seropositive for H. pylori were more likely to be current smokers than those who were seronegative (OR 7.9, 95% CI 2.0-30) [27,28]. In a survey study in Northern Ireland of 4742 randomly selected subjects, H. pylori seropositivity was more common in current smokers and ex-smokers than never smokers (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5) [29]. Others, however, have found a negative association between smoking and H. pylori infection. In a retrospective study of 8836 subjects, current smokers had lower risk of H. pylori seropositivity (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9) than those who had never smoked [30]. Another retrospective study of 545 subjects found no difference in H. pylori seropositivity between smokers (current and ex-smokers) and non-smokers (40% vs. 40%, p = 0.98). [31]. Socioeconomic class may have played a role in these conflicting data as this was not consistently controlled for in studies examining this topic [30]. Other potential confounding factors include alcohol consumption and use of medications such as PPI and antibiotics.

Alcohol: Although the relationship between smoking and H. pylori infection remains somewhat murky, habitual alcohol consumption does appear to protect against H. pylori [30-32]. In a German cross-sectional study of 6545 subjects, the seroprevalence of H. pylori was highest among subjects who reported no alcohol consumption and lowest among subjects consuming 25-50 g of alcohol per day (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8) [32]. While these data suggest a protective role for alcohol, factors that would influence H. pylori eradication such as recent use of antibiotics or PPI therapy were not controlled in this analysis. Interestingly, daily alcohol consumption is associated with greater success of eradication therapy with failure rate of only 12%, compared to 30% in those not consuming alcohol on a daily basis (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1 - 9.2) [33].


Clinical significance

H. pylori infection is linked to dyspepsia, gastritis, PUD, gastric adenocarcinoma, and MALT lymphoma. Up to 20% of H. pylori-infected individuals can develop one or more of these sequelae [34]. H. pylori infection may also protect against symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but this relationship has not been definitively established.

Dyspepsia: Symptoms of dyspepsia often include epigastric pain, postprandial fullness, and/or early satiety [35]. EGD must reveal no structural disease that could explain symptoms and patients must have at least one of the following - bothersome postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric pain, or epigastric burning [36]. While ulcers and gastritis can cause these symptoms, up to 70% of patients with dyspepsia have no evidence of mucosal injury [37]. In a prospective cohort study, H. pylori eradication was associated with improvement of epigastric pain [38]. Therefore, in patients under the age of 55 years without alarm features (bleeding, anemia, early satiety, unexplained weight loss, dysphagia, odynophagia, recurrent vomiting, family history of gastrointestinal cancer, previous esophago-gastric cancer), a "test and treat" strategy with H. pylori eradication is recommended [14]. Those with alarm features should undergo EGD to exclude underlying pathology such as PUD or esophageal or gastric malignancy.

Gastritis: In early infection, H. pylori gastritis preferentially causes inflammation at the gastric antrum, but later migrates proximally toward the body and cardia of the stomach. Unless treated early, acute gastritis will evolve into chronic gastritis. H. pylori organisms are most frequently detected at the gastric antrum [39]. In some cases, however, the organisms can be detected only in the body of the stomach, particularly during PPI use or in the presence of marked atrophy or gastric intestinal metaplasia. With chronic inflammation, there is a loss of gastrin producing G cells and acid producing parietal cells resulting in decreased acid secretion and the development of gastric atrophy with intestinal metaplasia [40]. The decrease in gastric acid secretion may lessen GERD symptoms and is the reason it has been suggested that H. pylori infection may protect against the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients with H. pylori associated atrophic gastritis are often asymptomatic, but these individuals are at increased risk of developing gastric carcinoma [41].

Peptic ulcer disease: H. pylori is present in 70-85% of patients with gastric ulcers and 90-95% of those with duodenal ulcers [42]. Nonetheless, it is important to obtain a detailed history to exclude nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as an additional cause of PUD. Early in infection, H. pylori preferentially colonizes the antrum resulting in exaggerated gastrin release and reduced somatostatin release, causing increased acid secretion contributing to the formation of duodenal ulcers [43]. If left untreated, H. pylori migrates proximally to the body of the stomach where it may cause diffuse gastritis and gastric ulcers.

Gastric adenocarcinoma: As mentioned previously, duodenal ulcers develop in the setting of antral predominant gastritis, minimal atrophy, and increased acid secretion. Gastric ulcers and gastric carcinoma, on the other hand, are associated with extensive gastritis, widespread intestinal metaplasia, and decreased acid secretion [44]. Gastric cancer was the fourth most common malignancy worldwide in 2008 with approximately 72% of new cases occurring in developing countries [45]. Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data between 2005-2011, the five-year relative survival rate for gastric cancer in the US is 29% [46].

The majority of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas [47]. Gastric adenocarcinoma can be subdivided into two morphologic types: intestinal-type and diffuse-type. Diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinomas are typically less well differentiated, with sheets of cells without gland formation with occasional signet ring cells and mucin. H. pylori infection, chronic gastritis, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia can all contribute to the development of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas [48]. H. pylori infection can also drive the development of diffuse-type gastric carcinomas, but gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia have not been shown to contribute to its development [49].

Mucosal associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: Extranodal marginal zone B cell lymphoma, also known as low grade B cell lymphoma of MALT, is an extranodal lymphoma that arises from mucosa associated lymphoid tissue, often in the stomach. MALT lymphoma can develop in other mucosal sites besides the stomach. H. pylori is present in the gastric mucosa in up to 92% of patients with MALT lymphoma [50]. H. pylori gastritis contributes directly to the pathogenesis of this gastric malignancy [50,51] with eradication essential for successful treatment of low grade MALT lymphoma. In a large cohort follow-up study of 420 patients with gastric low grade MALT lymphoma, up to 77% responded to H. pylori eradication [52].

GERD and Barrett's adenocarcinoma: Given its effect on acid production in the stomach, H. pylori infection has been hypothesized to impact GERD symptoms and potentially the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Early H. pylori infection causes increased gastrin release, but decreased somatostatin release. This has a net effect of increasing gastric acid secretion. In patients with a predisposition for GERD, increased acid production due to H. pylori infection may further exacerbate reflux symptoms.

The pathophysiology underlying chronic H. pylori gastritis differs considerably from acute H. pylori gastritis. In chronic H. pylori infection patients suffer from a loss of gastrin producing G cells and acid producing parietal cells, resulting in decreased acid production. This effect may protect against GERD, Barrett's esophagus and the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma [5-9]. Although these features suggest a protective role for H. Pylori, studies have been limited by the fact that subject have been classified as either H. pylori infected or uninfected, but whether H. pylori was localized to the gastric antrum or body has not been consistently examined.


Diagnosis

Endoscopic testing

H. pylori can be diagnosed during EGD with biopsy using rapid urease test (RUT), histology, bacterial culture, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Table 1) [14]. Indications for EGD are multiple and are delineated in the 2012 guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Although EGD can be utilized to determine if a patient is infected with H. pylori, it should not be performed for the sole purpose of establishing the diagnosis given the availability of several non-invasive testing techniques [14].



Table 1: Strategies for Diagnosing H. Pylori Infection. View Table 1


Rapid urease test

If EGD is to be performed, the test of choice for detecting H. pylori is the RUT performed on antral biopsy specimens. In patients who have taken PPI, antibiotics, or bismuth within 2 weeks of EGD, distribution of H. pylori infection can be patchy, therefore biopsies from both the antrum and the gastric body are needed for RUT [14]. In a prospective study of 620 patients undergoing EGD for gastrointestinal symptom, biopsies obtained from both the antrum and gastric body revealed the presence of H. Pylori in 307 (50%) patients, either by RUT or histology [53]. In this study, performing RUT on gastric body biopsies in addition to antral biopsies increased the detection rate of H. pylori by 6.3% [53]. Overall, RUT has a sensitivity of 90 - 95% and a specificity of 95 - 100% for detection of H. pylori [54,55].


Histology

Gastric biopsy histology testing for H. pylori also has a high sensitivity and specificity with both exceeding 95% [14]. However, testing is expensive and requires trained personnel [14]. In addition, its accuracy depends on the site biopsied, number of biopsies obtained, and size of biopsies submitted. Similar to RUT, test performance may be impaired in the setting of antibiotic, bismuth, or PPI use [14]. Combining gastric body biopsies with antral biopsies increases the detection rate of H. pylori [53]. Whether the patients in this study who had isolated positive gastric body histology with H. pylori were on PPI, antibiotics, or bismuth is unclear.


Bacterial culture and PCR

Bacterial culture and PCR are not widely available and are therefore rarely used in the clinical setting. While bacterial culture is useful for determining the susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics, it is not effective for detecting the presence or absence of H. pylori with a sensitivity of only 53%, although its specificity approaches 100% [14,56]. PCR is a DNA amplification technique that makes use of the multiple copies of a target DNA sequence to identify H. pylori. PCR is able to detect H. pylori not identified on histology [57] with sensitivity greater than 90% [58,59]. PCR also has the added benefit of being able to detect mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance [60], allowing clinicians to tailor their eradication strategy accordingly. However, PCR is currently limited to research settings and is not available for routine clinical practice.


Nonendoscopic testing

Antibody testing, urea breath testing, and the fecal antigen test are three noninvasive diagnostic tests available for determining if a patient is infected with H. pylori (Table 1).

Antibody testing: Serum H. pylori IgG is generally detectable approximately 21 days after infection and remains positive long after eradication [61]. It has a sensitivity of up to 85% with a specificity of 79% [62]. Antibody testing is inexpensive and widely available, but is limited by the fact that it cannot distinguish between active and past infection.

Urea breath test: The urea breath test is another non-invasive testing option. Its major drawback is that it requires the patient to ingest urea, labeled with either non-radioactive (13C) or radioactive carbon (14C). If H. pylori is present, urease produced by the bacteria breaks down ingested urea releasing labeled carbon dioxide, which is measured in exhaled air [63]. The sensitivity and specificity of urea breath testing exceeds 95% [14,63]. Antibiotics and bismuth should be avoided for at least one month and PPI for 7-14 days prior to performing the urea breath test. Performing the test on these medications is associated with an increased false negative rate [14,63]. The requirement for appropriate testing equipment and the cost of obtaining labeled urea limits the availability of this test [14].

Fecal antigen test: Fecal antigen testing identifies H. pylori antigen in stool through immunologic techniques using a polyclonal antibody directed against H. pylori [14]. Because this test detects active infection, it can be used as a screening test as well as for confirming eradication. If used for documentation of cure after H. pylori therapy, it should be performed 8 weeks after completion of therapy [64]. Similar to the urea breath test, patients should avoid PPI for at least 14 days prior to undergoing fecal antigen test to minimize the chance of obtaining a false negative result.


Treatment

Multiple options exist for the treatment of patients with active H. pylori infection (Table 2 and Table 3). Determining which regimen is most appropriate depends on several factors including local susceptibility patterns, whether a patient is undergoing initial treatment, likelihood of patient adherence, and patient factors such as the presence or absence of drug allergies.



Table 2: First-line regimens for H. Pylori Eradication [14]. View Table 2



Table 3: Salvage regimens for H. Pylori Eradication [14]. View Table 3


Adherence to therapy is an important factor with non-adherence contributing to treatment failure as well as antibiotic resistance. As a result, regimens that are "easier" to take are generally preferred. Eradication regimens that require the patient to take drugs twice a day are more likely to be followed when compared to more frequent dosing regimens. Both three and four drug regimens are acceptable first-line therapies to eradicate H. pylori (Table 2). Triple therapy consists of a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole and is taken twice daily. Triple therapy should be administered for 14 days [65,66]. Quadruple therapy utilizes a PPI or H2 receptor antagonist, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline. These medications are taken up to four times daily for 10-14 days [14]. Although both triple and quadruple therapies have been recommended as first-line options for the treatment of H. Pylori, the complexity of four times daily dosing and the high pill count in quadruple therapy may be challenging for patients to take and has the potential to be associated with decreased patient adherence.

Eradication rates vary according to the strategy utilized. Clarithromycin-based triple therapy has become less effective over time. Previously, eradication rates with triple therapy and quadruple therapy were as high as 93% and 80%, respectively [13,67,68]. In a recent meta-analysis examining 104 studies of 42,124 patients treated with triple therapy for H. pylori, the overall eradication rate was 75% (95% CI 72-77%) by intention-to-treat analysis and 82% (95% CI 81-83%) by per-protocol analysis [12]. A prospective study of 37 patients found that the eradication rate associated with 14 days of quadruple therapy administered twice daily was 92% (95% CI 79-98%) [69]. Although these data suggest that quadruple therapy is more effective than triple therapy, the study sizes vary considerably and this should be considered while interpreting these data.

Sequential therapy can also be used to treat H. pylori. This strategy differs in that not all medications are taken at the same time. Sequential therapy includes a PPI taken with amoxicillin for 5 days followed by a PPI, clarithromycin, and tinidazole (or metronidazole) for an additional 5 days [14]. In a prospective randomized study of 213 patients, sequential therapy was found to be more effective than either 7 or 10 days of triple therapy (94% vs. 76% vs. 82%, respectively, p < 0.05) [70]. In this study, adherence was determined by pill count at follow-up visit. Only 6 patients (3%) withdrew from the study due to side effects [70]. There was no difference in the incidence in side effect among the treatment arms studied [70]. In a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials with 3,006 adults, sequential therapy was shown to be more effective for H. pylori eradication than both 7 day triple therapy (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.5-3.6) and 10 day triple therapy (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.0-4.4) without a difference in side effects (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.3) [71]. Adherence to sequential therapy exceeded 90% [70,72-74].

In cases of persistent H. pylori infection, bismuth-based quadruple therapy, levofloxacin-based triple therapy, or sequential therapy are acceptable salvage options (Table 3). Previously utilized antibiotics should be avoided in cases of persistent infection, as bacteria may be resistant to prior medications. Due to expense and lack of availability, culture and antimicrobial sensitivity testing are not routinely recommended [14].


Documentation of Eradication

Documentation of H. pylori eradication is recommended in patients who have undergone resection of early gastric cancer and those with H. pylori associated ulcer, H. pylori associated MALT lymphoma, or in patients who have persistent dyspeptic symptoms [14]. Testing for eradication should not be performed earlier than 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Confirmation of eradication can be performed using nonendoscopic testing. EGD should only be performed if other clinical indications exist, not solely for determining whether H. pylori has been eradicated [14]. If EGD were to be performed, biopsies for histology should be obtained from both the antrum and the gastric body as histology on antral biopsies alone can miss up to 5% of H. pylori infection after triple therapy [75]. If endoscopic follow-up is not necessary, either urea breathe test or fecal antigen test can be used to confirm H. pylori eradication. Serum H. pylori IgG testing should not be used to document eradication as this can remain positive long after infection has cleared.


Conclusion

H. pylori is a common infection and can be associated with clinical symptoms and diagnoses including dyspepsia, PUD, gastritis, gastric cancer, and MALT lymphoma. EGD is not indicated for diagnosing H. pylori infection alone, but can be used to diagnose H. pylori when other indications for upper endoscopy exist. Both endoscopic and nonendoscopic options are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori and confirmation of its eradication. A 14 day course of triple therapy or quadruple therapy can be used as initial therapy. Clarithromycin-based triple therapy has become less effective over time. As a result, quadruple therapy or sequential therapy has been increasingly utilized. Previously prescribed antibiotics should be avoided in management of persistent H. pylori infection. If not previously used, quadruple therapy, levofloxacin-based triple therapy, or sequential therapy can be used as salvage therapy.


Disclosures

All authors contributed to the production of this work. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.


Acknowledgement

This work was supported by NIH grant P30 DK0-090868 to LP McLean.


References
  1. Brown LM (2000) Helicobacter pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev 22: 283-297.

  2. Holt JB, Huston SL, Heidari K, Schwartz R, Gollmar CW, et al. (2015) Indicators for chronic disease surveillance - United States, 2013. MMWR Recomm Rep 64: 1-246.

  3. McColl KE (2010) Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 362: 1597-1604.

  4. (1994) Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7-14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 61: 1-241.

  5. Fallone CA, Barkun AN, Friedman G, Mayrand S, Loo V, et al. (2000) Is Helicobacter pylori eradication associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease? Am J Gastroenterol 95: 914-920.

  6. Laine L, Sugg J (2002) Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on development of erosive esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a post hoc analysis of eight double blind prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 2992-2997.

  7. Nie S, Chen T, Yang X, Huai P, Lu M (2014) Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 27: 645-653.

  8. Weston AP, Badr AS, Topalovski M, Cherian R, Dixon A, et al. (2000) Prospective evaluation of the prevalence of gastric Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with GERD, Barrett's esophagus, Barrett's dysplasia, and Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 387-394.

  9. Yaghoobi M, Farrokhyar F, Yuan Y, Hunt RH (2010) Is there an increased risk of GERD after Helicobacter pylori eradication?: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 105: 1007-1013.

  10. Marshall BJ, Warren JR (1984) Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1: 1311-1315.

  11. Kusters JG, van Vliet AH, Kuipers EJ (2006) Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 449-490.

  12. Gong EJ, Yun SC, Jung HY, Lim H, Choi KS, et al. (2014) Meta-analysis of first-line triple therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea: is it time to change? J Korean Med Sci 29: 704-713.

  13. Romano M, Cuomo A (2004) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a clinical update. MedGenMed 6: 19.

  14. Chey WD, Wong BC; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2007) American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 102: 1808-1825.

  15. Aziz RK, Khalifa MM, Sharaf RR (2015) Contaminated water as a source of Helicobacter pylori infection: A review. J Adv Res 6: 539-547.

  16. Bui D, Brown HE, Harris RB, Oren E (2016) Serologic Evidence for Fecal-Oral Transmission of Helicobacter pylori. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94: 82-88.

  17. Lauritano D, Cura F, Candotto V, Gaudio RM, Mucchi D, et al. (2015) Periodontal Pockets As A Reservoir Of Helicobacter Pylori Causing Relapse Of Gastric Ulcer: A Review Of The Literature. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 29: 123-126.

  18. Cave DR (1997) How is Helicobacter pylori transmitted? Gastroenterology 113: S9-14.

  19. Grubel P, Hoffman JS, Chong FK, Burstein NA, Mepani C, et al. (1997) Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1300-1303.

  20. Fantry GT, Zheng QX, James SP (1995) Conventional cleaning and disinfection techniques eliminate the risk of endoscopic transmission of Helicobacter pylori. Am J Gastroenterol 90: 227-232.

  21. (2011) World gastroenterology organisation global guideline: Helicobacter pylori in developing countries. J Dig Dis 12: 319-326.

  22. Nguyen T, Ramsey D, Graham D, Shaib Y, Shiota S, et al. (2015) The Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Remains High in African American and Hispanic Veterans. Helicobacter 20: 305-315.

  23. Smoak BL, Kelley PW, Taylor DN (1994) Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infections in a cohort of US Army recruits. Am J Epidemiol 139: 513-519.

  24. Malaty HM, Graham DY, Isaksson I, Engstrand L, Pedersen NL (1998) Co-twin study of the effect of environment and dietary elements on acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Epidemiol 148: 793-797.

  25. Replogle ML, Glaser SL, Hiatt RA, Parsonnet J (1995) Biologic sex as a risk factor for Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy young adults. Am J Epidemiol 142: 856-863.

  26. de Martel C, Parsonnet J (2006) Helicobacter pylori infection and gender: a meta-analysis of population-based prevalence surveys. Dig Dis Sci 51: 2292-2301.

  27. Fontham ET, Ruiz B, Perez A, Hunter F, Correa P (1995) Determinants of Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol 90: 1094-1101.

  28. Hamajima N, Inoue M, Tajima K, Tominaga S, Matsuura A, et al. (1997) Lifestyle and anti-Helicobacter pylori immunoglobulin G antibody among outpatients. Jpn J Cancer Res 88: 1038-1043.

  29. Murray LJ, McCrum EE, Evans AE, Bamford KB (1997) Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection among 4742 randomly selected subjects from Northern Ireland. Int J Epidemiol 26: 880-887.

  30. Ogihara A, Kikuchi S, Hasegawa A, Kurosawa M, Miki K, et al. (2000) Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and smoking and drinking habits. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15: 271-276.

  31. Yang X, Nishibayashi H, TTakeshita T, Morimoto K (1999) Prevalence ofHelicobacter pylori infection in Japan: Relation to educational levels and hygienic conditions. Environ Health Prev Med 3: 202-206.

  32. Kuepper-Nybelen J, Thefeld W, Rothenbacher D, Brenner H (2005) Patterns of alcohol consumption and Helicobacter pylori infection: results of a population-based study from Germany among 6545 adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21: 57-64.

  33. Baena JM, Lopez C, Hidalgo A, Rams F, Jimenez S, et al. (2002) Relation between alcohol consumption and the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 1 week. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14: 291-296.

  34. Venerito M, Vasapolli R, Rokkas T, Malfertheiner P (2015) Helicobacter pylori and Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Helicobacter 20 Suppl 1: 36-39.

  35. Lacy BE, Talley NJ, Camilleri M (2010) Functional dyspepsia: time to change clinical trial design? Am J Gastroenterol 105: 2525-2529.

  36. The Rome Foundation, Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

  37. Loyd RA, McClellan DA (2011) Update on the evaluation and management of functional dyspepsia. Am Fam Physician 83: 547-552.

  38. Sanping Xu, Xueming Wan, Xiaolan Zheng, Yali Zhou, Zhiqiang Song, et al. Symptom improvement after helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with functional dyspepsia-A multicenter, randomized, prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Exp Med 6: 747-756.

  39. Dursun M, Yilmaz S, Yukselen V, Kilinc N, Canoruc F, et al. (2004) Evaluation of optimal gastric mucosal biopsy site and number for identification of Helicobacter pylori, gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. Hepatogastroenterology 51: 1732-1735.

  40. Vaananen H, Vauhkonen M, Helske T, Kaariainen I, Rasmussen M, et al. (2003) Non-endoscopic diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with a blood test. Correlation between gastric histology and serum levels of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I: a multicentre study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15: 885-891.

  41. Yanaoka K, Oka M, Ohata H, Yoshimura N, Deguchi H, et al. (2009) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents cancer development in subjects with mild gastric atrophy identified by serum pepsinogen levels. Int J Cancer 125: 2697-2703.

  42. Testerman TL, Morris J (2014) Beyond the stomach: an updated view of Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 20: 12781-12808.

  43. Graham DY, Opekun A, Lew GM, Klein PD, Walsh JH (1991) Helicobacter pylori-associated exaggerated gastrin release in duodenal ulcer patients. The effect of bombesin infusion and urea ingestion. Gastroenterology 100: 1571-1575.

  44. Correa P (1992) Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process--First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res 52: 6735-6740.

  45. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures.

  46. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

  47. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69-90.

  48. Sipponen P, Kekki M, Siurala M (1983) Atrophic chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in gastric carcinoma. Comparison with a representative population sample. Cancer 52: 1062-1068.

  49. Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Sato K, Shiraishi N, et al. (2000) Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type. Cancer 89: 1418-1424.

  50. Wotherspoon AC, Ortiz-Hidalgo C, Falzon MR, Isaacson PG (1991) Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and primary B-cell gastric lymphoma. Lancet 338: 1175-1176.

  51. Zucca E, Bertoni F, Roggero E, Bosshard G, Cazzaniga G, et al. (1998) Molecular analysis of the progression from Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis to mucosa-associated lymphoid-tissue lymphoma of the stomach. N Engl J Med 338: 804-810.

  52. Nakamura S, Sugiyama T, Matsumoto T, Iijima K, Ono S, et al. (2012) Long-term clinical outcome of gastric MALT lymphoma after eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre cohort follow-up study of 420 patients in Japan. Gut 61: 507-513.

  53. van IJzendoorn MC, Laheij RJ, de Boer WA, Jansen JB (2005) The importance of corpus biopsies for the determination of Helicobacter pylori infection. Neth J Med 63: 141-145.

  54. Midolo P, Marshall BJ (2000) Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Urease tests. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 29: 871-878.

  55. Perna F, Ricci C, Gatta L, Bernabucci V, Cavina M, et al. (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of a new rapid urease test (Pronto Dry), before and after treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 51: 247-254.

  56. Lehours P, Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, Lavergne A, Cantet F, Megraud F (2003) Which test to use to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma? Am J Gastroenterol 98: 291-295.

  57. Zsikla V, Hailemariam S, Baumann M, Mund MT, Schaub N, et al. (2006) Increased rate of Helicobacter pylori infection detected by PCR in biopsies with chronic gastritis. Am J Surg Pathol 30: 242-248.

  58. van Doorn LJ, Figueiredo C, Rossau R, Jannes G, van Asbroek M, et al. (1998) Typing of Helicobacter pylori vacA gene and detection of cagA gene by PCR and reverse hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 36: 1271-1276.

  59. Sugimoto M, Wu JY, Abudayyeh S, Hoffman J, Brahem H, et al. (2009) Unreliability of results of PCR detection of Helicobacter pylori in clinical or environmental samples. J Clin Microbiol 47: 738-742.

  60. Lawson AJ, Elviss NC, Owen RJ (2005) Real-time PCR detection and frequency of 16S rDNA mutations associated with resistance and reduced susceptibility to tetracycline in Helicobacter pylori from England and Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 282-286.

  61. Ho B, Marshall BJ (2000) Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Serologic testing. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 29: 853-862.

  62. Loy CT, Irwig LM, Katelaris PH, Talley NJ (1996) Do commercial serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection differ in accuracy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 1138-1144.

  63. Chey WD (2000) Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 14C-urea breath test. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 29: 895-902.

  64. Costa F, Mumolo MG, Bellini M, Romano MR, Manghetti M, et al. (2001) Post-treatment diagnostic accuracy of a new enzyme immunoassay to detect Helicobacter pylori in stools. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15: 395-401.

  65. Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, Gisbert JP, Forman D, et al. (2013) Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12: CD008337.

  66. Kim BG, Lee DH, Ye BD, Lee KH, Kim BW, Kim SG, et al. (2007) Comparison of 7-day and 14-day proton pump inhibitor-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: neither treatment duration provides acceptable eradication rate in Korea. Helicobacter 12: 31-35.

  67. Kalach N, Gosset P, Dehecq E, Decoster A, Spyckerelle C, et al. (2015) Usefulness of Gastric Biopsy-Based Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 61: 307-312.

  68. Katelaris PH, Forbes GM, Talley NJ, Crotty B (2002) A randomized comparison of quadruple and triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: The QUADRATE Study. Gastroenterology 123: 1763-1769.

  69. Graham DY, Belson G, Abudayyeh S, Osato MS, Dore MP, et al. (2004) Twice daily (mid-day and evening) quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection in the United States. Dig Liver Dis 36: 384-387.

  70. Scaccianoce G, Hassan C, Panarese A, Piglionica D, Morini S, et al. (2006) Helicobacter pylori eradication with either 7-day or 10-day triple therapies, and with a 10-day sequential regimen. Can J Gastroenterol 20: 113-117.

  71. Gatta L, Vakil N, Leandro G, Di Mario F, Vaira D (2009) Sequential therapy or triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults and children. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 3069-3079.

  72. Zullo A, Vaira D, Vakil N, Hassan C, Gatta L, et al. (2003) High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17: 719-726.

  73. Zullo A, Gatta L, De Francesco V, Hassan C, Ricci C, et al. (2005) High rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication with sequential therapy in elderly patients with peptic ulcer: a prospective controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21: 1419-1424.

  74. Francavilla R, Lionetti E, Castellaneta SP, Magista AM, Boscarelli G, et al. (2005) Improved efficacy of 10-Day sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 129: 1414-1419.

  75. Laine L, Sugg J, Suchower L, Neil G (2000) Endoscopic biopsy requirements for post-treatment diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 664-669.

International Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology (ISSN: 2377-4630)
International Journal of Blood Research and Disorders   (ISSN: 2469-5696)
International Journal of Brain Disorders and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5866)
International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-3419)
International Journal of Clinical Cardiology (ISSN: 2469-5696)
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-584X)
Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports (ISSN: 2378-3656)
Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy (ISSN: 2469-5750)
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2377-3634)
Journal of Family Medicine and Disease Prevention (ISSN: 2469-5793)
Journal of Genetics and Genome Research (ISSN: 2378-3648)
Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (ISSN: 2469-5858)
International Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3672)
International Journal of Medical Nano Research (ISSN: 2378-3664)
International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3001)
International Archives of Nursing and Health Care (ISSN: 2469-5823)
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-346X)
International Journal of Oral and Dental Health (ISSN: 2469-5734)
International Journal of Pathology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2469-5807)
International Journal of Pediatric Research (ISSN: 2469-5769)
International Journal of Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine (ISSN: 2378-3516)
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5726)
International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine (ISSN: 2469-5718)
International Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy (ISSN: 2469-570X)
International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice (ISSN: 2378-3397)
Trauma Cases and Reviews (ISSN: 2469-5777)
International Archives of Urology and Complications (ISSN: 2469-5742)
International Journal of Virology and AIDS (ISSN: 2469-567X)
More Journals

Contact Us

ClinMed International Library | Science Resource Online LLC
3511 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19810, USA
Email: contact@clinmedlib.org
 

Feedback

Get Email alerts
 
Creative Commons License
Open Access
by ClinMed International Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at https://clinmedjournals.org/.
Copyright © 2017 ClinMed International Library. All Rights Reserved.