Table 3: Association of select PROMIS-29 scores with chronic conditions: F-Ratios and relative efficiency (N = 1226).

 

F-Ratios

Relative Efficiency

Condition

Pain1

Pain4

PF

ISS

PSumm

Pain1

Pain4

PF

ISS

PSumm

Hypertension

3.51

5.06

6.92

7.45

6.53

REF

1.44

1.97

2.12

1.86

Depression

47.67

44.31

23.59

49.21

32.43

2.02

1.88

REF

2.09

1.37

Diabetes

8.67

12.04

12.04

16.59

13.5

REF

1.39

1.39

1.91

1.56

Arthritis

30.38

34

22.38

38.73

25.49

1.36

1.52

REF

1.73

1.14

Sciatica

34.3

21.93

5.93

22.24

9.57

5.78

3.70

REF

3.75

1.61

Ischemic Heart Disease

4.26

11.52

5.79

7.08

6.81

REF

2.70

1.36

1.66

1.60

Congestive Heart Failure

2.94

1.5

27.4

18.06

27.75

1.96

REF

18.27

12.04

18.50

Chronic Lung Disease

3.91

5.02

11.74

9.76

12.22

REF

1.28

3.00

2.50

3.13

Osteoporosis

11.01

10.76

28.83

24.24

29.19

1.02

REF

2.68

2.25

2.71

Stroke

0.74

0.26

12.17

2.15

11.78

NA

REF

46.81

NA

45.31

Cancer

0.25

0.16

0.67

0.26

0.42

 

       

Other Heart Problems

0.11

0.47

0.95

1.02

1.06

 

       

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

0

0.01

0.15

0.02

0.14

 

       

NOTES: F-Ratios are based on Type III Sums of Squares from multivariate regression models predicting PROMIS score from all 13 chronic conditions; Relative Efficiency is ratio of PROMIS score F-ratio to lowest F-ratio for the condition; Pain1 = Single item pain intensity score; Pain4 = 4-item pain interference score; PF = 4-item Physical Function score; ISS = 9-item Impact Stratification Score; PSumm = Physical Health Summary score; non-italicized F-ratios are significant at p < 0.05 with Benjamini-Hochburg adjustment; REF = Reference value for relative efficiency (lowest F-ratio); NA= Not applicable due to non-significance of associated F-ratio. The highest relative efficiency value for each condition is in bold.