Citation

Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Sawatsubashi M, Taura M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. (2019) Experiences of Teasing and Bullying in Children Who Stutter. Int Arch Commun Disord 2:013. doi.org/10.23937/2643-4148/1710013

Research Article | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2643-4148/1710013

Experiences of Teasing and Bullying in Children Who Stutter

Yoshikazu Kikuchi1*, Toshiro Umezaki2,3, Motohiro Sawatsubashi4, Masahiko Taura1, Yumi Yamaguchi1, Daisuke Murakami1 and Takashi Nakagawa1

1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan

2Voice and Swallowing Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Japan

3International University of Health and Welfare, Japan

4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Japan

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores the experiences of children who stutter (CWS) in terms of others imitating or questioning them, or laughing at their speech patterns.

Methods

Participants were 120 CWS, aged 3-12 years, who were patients at our hospital. Each child was asked the following three questions: Has anyone asked you why you speak in that way? (questioned); has anyone imitated the way you speak? (imitated); and has anyone laughed at your speech? (laughed). We also asked if the CWS felt unhappy or happy about these responses.

Results

The total proportion of children who were questioned, imitated, and laughed at was 66.6%. Most of the CWS in the study over 4-years-old felt unhappy with any of these responses to stuttering.

Conclusion

We found that even at age 4, CWS remembered non-friendly exchanges with their peers. It is important to take action against teasing and bullying through asking CWS about their experiences of being questioned, imitated, or laughed at.

Keywords

Children who stutter; Prevention; Speech disorder; Teasing; Responses to bullying

Abbreviations

CWS: Children Who Stutter

Introduction

Stuttering is a speech disorder characterized by involuntary repetitions or prolongations of words or syllables, or interruptions in flow of speech, known as blocks [1,2]. Some children may comment on another child's stuttering out of curiosity or interest. Such comments may be hurtful to a child who stutters (CWS), even when bullying was not the intent [3]. The consequences of being bullied and teased during childhood may increase social anxiety, reduce self-esteem, and lead to poorer peer relationships, among other things [4,5]. Indeed, at least 40% of adults who stutter also have a social anxiety disorder [6]. Early detection and prevention of teasing and bullying associated with stuttering is therefore needed.

Although the terms bullying and teasing are often used interchangeably, it is helpful to distinguish them [7]. In Japan, bullying refers to non-friendly exchanges between peers; this definition is based on legislation aimed at preventing bullying at elementary, junior high, and senior high schools [8]. Teasing, on the other hand, refers to an enjoyable exchange between friends, without any malicious intent. Stuttering typically arises in children aged 2-4 years, and according to parents' questionnaire, children as young as 2-years-old have been found to be aware of their own stuttering [9]. Bullying behavior can be ranked from mild to severe; imitation is classified as mild bullying [10]. In addition to being imitated, CWS are also often questioned and laughed at. The aim of this study was to interview CWS aged 3-12 years on their experiences of being questioned, imitated, or laughed at, and to determine whether these incidents left them feeling unhappy.

Methods

Participants were 120 CWS (98 male and 22 female) between ages 3 and 12, who visited Kyushu University Hospital from 2012 to 2017 for consultations on their stuttering. The age distribution was as follows: 14 three-year-olds (12 male, 2 female); 8 four-year-olds (all male); 20 five-year-olds (14 male, 6 female); 24 six-year-olds (21 male, 3 female); 14 seven-year-olds (11 male, 3 female); 18 eight-year-olds (13 male, 5 female); 4 nine-year-olds (3 male, 1 female); 8 ten-year-olds (7 male, 1 female); 6 eleven-year-olds (all male); and 4 twelve-year-olds (3 male, 1 female). On first consultation, we asked each child the following three questions:

• Has anyone asked you why you speak in that way?

• Has anyone imitated the way you speak?

• Has anyone laughed at your speech?

We also asked if they felt unhappy or happy about these incidents. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kyushu University (29-117) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

The proportion of CWS who were questioned, imitated, or laughed at is depicted in Table 1 and Figure 1. The average proportion of children who were questioned was 44.2% (0% at age three; 13% at age four; 35% at age five; 38% at age six; 64% at age seven; 67% at age eight; 75% at age nine; 50% at age ten; 83% at age eleven; and 75% at age twelve), those who were imitated was 30.8% (14% at age three; 13% at age four; 25% at age five; 29% at age six; 64% at age seven; 28% at age eight; 75% at age nine; 38% at age ten; 0% at age eleven; and 50% at age twelve), and ones who were laughed at was 26.7% (7% at age three; 13% at age four; 40% at age five; 21% at age six; 21% at age seven; 33% at age eight; 25% at age nine; 38% at age ten; 33% at age eleven; and 50% at age twelve). The total proportion of children who were questioned, imitated, and laughed at was 66.6% (21% at age three; 25% at age four; 70% at age five; 54% at age six; 71% at age seven; 78% at age eight; 100% at age nine; 63% at age ten; 83% at age eleven; and 100% at age twelve). There were no gender differences.

Figure 1: The proportion of CWS who had been questioned about their speech patterns, imitated, or laughed at by others. View Figure 1

Figure 2: The proportion of CWS who were "unhappy" with being questioned, imitated, or laughed at, according to age. View Figure 2

Table 1: Detailed proportion of CWS who had experienced being questioned about their speech pattern, imitated, or laughed at by others. View Table 1

The percentage of CWS who were unhappy with being questioned, imitated, or laughed at is depicted in Figure 2. The distribution of CWS who were unhappy, was 0% at age three; 50% at age four; 100% at age five; 92.3% at age six; 100% at age seven; 100% at age eight; 100% at age nine; 100% at age ten; 100% at age eleven; and 100% at age twelve.

Discussion

This is the study to ask CWS as young as age three and over about their attitudes to being questioned, imitated, or laughed at regarding their stuttering. The proportion of CWS who were questioned exceeded those who were imitated or laughed at. Ezrati-Vinacour et al [11] reported that preschool children with normal fluency are fully aware of stuttering-like disfluencies at age five. Half of four-year-old CWS did not feel unhappy about being questioned, imitated, or laughed at. We recommend that physicians and speech language pathologists ask CWS over age four whether they were questioned, imitated, or laughed at, to detect bullying associated with stuttering.

We did not find three-year-olds who felt unhappy with being questioned, imitated, or laughed at. Boey et al [9] found that children are aware of their own stuttering from as early as two years old, based on parental-reported unambiguous verbal and non-verbal reactions in response to stuttering. However, the study by Boey et al [9] explored difficulties of CWS from the perspective of parents, while our study examined children's memories of experiences with their peers. The difference in findings may be related to children's ability to process experiences and emotions, which increases with age.

There are some studies on bullying detection. Langevin et al [10], with the help of 19 items of The Teasing/Bullying Questionnaire for Children Who Stutter (TBQ-CS), reported that nearly 60% of children aged 7-15, who stuttered frequently, experienced bullying behaviors. Blood and Blood [4] examined adults who stuttered, using 46 items of the Retrospective Bullying Questionnaire (RBQ); their findings showed that 30.6% of participants were bullied in primary school, 27.8% in secondary school, and 11.1% in university. Furthermore, Hugh-Jones and Smith [12] reported that 75% of adults who stuttered believed that the bullying they experienced in school had affected their academic performance. There were many strategies of addressing bullying [3,13] and Yaruss et al [14] summarized six key steps to prevent and minimize bullying: (1) Educating children about stuttering; (2) Educating children about bullying; (3) Helping children change the way they think and feel about their stuttering through desensitization, cognitive restructuring, and acceptance activities; (4) Helping children learn to use appropriately assertive responses that decrease the likelihood of bullying; (5) Educating peers and bystanders about stuttering and bullying so that they are more likely to respond in helpful ways; and (6) Educating parents, teachers, and administrators about how they can create an environment where it is not okay to bully, but it is okay to stutter.

The limitation of this study was the lack of data on stuttering severity of the participants, and it is likely that more severe stuttering may lead to an increase in bullying severity. However, even CWS who had a minimal stutter in our examination were bullied by their classmates; stuttering severity may not be the only factor determining the severity of bullying.

Key Messages

• A large proportion of children who stutter are questioned, imitated, and laughed at.

• Children who stutter are bullied from as young as four-years-old.

• Bullying impacts people who stutter into adulthood.

• Psychological effects of bullying should be addressed by holistic treatment.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) 17K16922 and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 17dk0310066h0202 and 19dk0310102j0001. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Adachi K, Sawatsubashi M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. (2018) Evaluation of vocal fold motion during blocks in adults who stutter. Int Arch Commun Disord 1: 1-6.
  2. Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Uehara T, Yamaguchi H, Yamashita K, et al. (2018) A case of multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian type with stuttering-and palilalia-like dysfluencies and putaminal atrophy. J Fluency Disord 57: 51-58.
  3. Murphy WP, Yaruss JS, Quesal RW (2007) Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter: II. Reducing bullying through role-playing and self-disclosure. J Fluency Disord 32: 139-162.
  4. Blood GW, Blood IM (2016) Long-term consequences of childhood bullying in adults who stutter: Social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, self-esteem, and satisfaction with life. J Fluency Disord 50: 72-84.
  5. Hymel S, Swearer SM (2015) Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist 70: 293.
  6. Blumgart E, Tran Y, Craig A (2010) Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter. Depress Anxiety 27: 687-692.
  7. Coloroso B (2003) The bully, the bullied, and the bystander. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publisher, Inc.
  8. Horii M (2015) The Meaning of Legislation and Problem of "Act to Accelerate Countermeasures against Bullying": Formative Process of Law and Policy on Bullying. Kokushikan Journal of the Humanities 47: 1-18.
  9. Boey RA, Van de Heyning PH, Wuyts FL, Heylen L, Stoop R, et al. (2009) Awareness and reactions of young stuttering children aged 2-7 years old towards their speech disfluency. J Commun Disord 42: 334-346.
  10. Langevin M, Bortnick K, Hammer T, Wiebe E (1998) Teasing/bullying experienced by children who stutter: Toward development of a questionnaire. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders 25: 12-24.
  11. Ezrati-Vinacour R, PlatzkymR, Yairi E (2001) The young child's awareness of stuttering-like disfluency. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44: 368-380.
  12. Hugh-Jones S, Smith PK (1999) Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. Br J Educ Psychol 69: 141-158.
  13. Blood GW, Boyle MP, Blood IM, Nalesnik GR (2010) Bullying in children who stutter: Speech-language pathologists' perceptions and intervention strategies. J Fluency Disord 35: 92-109.
  14. Yaruss JS, Reeves N, Herring C (2018) How speech-language pathologists can minimize bullying of children who stutter. Semin Speech Lang 39: 342-355.

Citation

Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Sawatsubashi M, Taura M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. (2019) Experiences of Teasing and Bullying in Children Who Stutter. Int Arch Commun Disord 2:013. doi.org/10.23937/2643-4148/1710013