Table 3: Comparison of Bland (Bland, 2000) grading with the authors proposed grading.
Grading |
Bland |
Modified grading by Hirani |
Grade 1 |
Inching, palm/wrist median/ulnar comparison, ring finger double peak |
Early: SCV = 45-50 m/s interpeak potentials in digit IV > 0.5 ms, Distal Motor Latency (DML) < 4.2 ms. Amplitude of sensory and motor potentials ≥ 5 |
Grade 2 |
Mild Sensory: Sensory conduction velocity (SCV < 40 m/s DML < 4.5 ms |
Mild sensory: SCV = 40-44.9 m/s with normal sensory amplitude (NSA), DML, amplitude and CV |
Grade 3 |
Moderately Severe: DML > 4.5 ms and < 6.5 ms with Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) preserved |
Mild sensory motor: SCV = 40-44.9 m/s with NSA, DML > 4.2 ms with normal motor amplitude (NMA) and normal CV (NCV) |
Grade 4 |
Severe: DML > 4.5 ms and < 6.5 ms with absent SNAP |
Moderate sensory: SCV < 40 m/s with NSA, normal DML, NMA and NCV |
Grade 5 |
Very Severe: DML > 6.5 ms. |
Moderate sensory motor: SCV < 40 m/s with NSA, DML > 4.2 ms and MNA and NCV |
Grade 6 |
Extremely Severe : Motor nerve action potentials (MNAP) < 0.2 mV, |
Severe Sensory motor: Absent or < 3 µV SNAP with SCV < 30 m/s and DML > 4.2 ms with either slow or normal MCV and or NMA |
Grade 7 |
|
Extremely severe: SNAP and CMAP absent, but recordable from both median and ulnar 2nd lumbricals with prolonged median 2nd lumbrical response compared to ulnar lumbricals |
Grade 8 |
|
Complete: SNAP and CMAP absent and absent median 2nd lumbrical and present ulnar 2nd lumbrical. |