Table 5: Logistic regression analysis of urinary complications and predictors using propensity score.
Parameter | Estimate | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value |
Treatment Conservative management |
-0.1941 | 0.824 (0.769, 0.882) | < 0.0001 |
Race Black Others |
-0.2512 -0.0082 |
0.778 (0.690, 0.878) 0.992 (0.857, 1.148) |
< 0.0001 0.9126 |
Marital status Single |
0.3679 | 1.445 (1.270, 1.644) | < 0.0001 |
Age 66-69 70-74 75-79 |
-0.5685 -0.3062 -0.1647 |
0.566 (0.492, 0.652) 0.736 (0.638, 0.850) 0.848 (0.729, 0.987) |
< 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0333 |
Grade Well-differentiated |
-0.3074 | 0.735 (0.596, 0.908) | 0.0042 |
Comorbidity Null One |
-0.5763 -0.2433 |
0.562 (0.505, 0.625) 0.784 (0.696, 0.883) |
< 0.0001 < 0.0001 |
Note: Model was found to be statistically significant. Result of likelihood ratio test: χ2 value - 404.668 and P value < 0.0001. CI indicates Confidence Interval. Base case includes patients who were in immediate treatment group, with race white, married, aged 80 or above, with moderately differentiated tumors and with greater than 1 comorbidities.