Table 6: Logistic regression analysis of rectal complications and predictors using propensity score.
Parameter | Estimate | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value |
Treatment Conservative management |
-0.2620 | 0.770 (0.710, 0.834) | < 0.0001 |
Race Black Others |
-0.1925 -0.5486 |
0.825 (0.712, 0.956) 0.578 (0.474, 0.705) |
0.0104 < 0.0001 |
Marital status Single |
-0.3301 | 0.719 (0.612, 0.845) | < 0.0001 |
Age 66-69 70-74 75-79 |
0.1219 0.0902 0.1218 |
1.130 (0.959, 1.331) 1.094 (0.927, 1.292) 1.130 (0.949, 1.345) |
0.1453 0.2861 0.1704 |
Grade Well-differentiated |
-0.1525 | 0.859 (0.664, 1.111) | 0.2459 |
Comorbidity Null One |
-0.4056 -0.1563 |
0.667 (0.594, 0.748) 0.855 (0.752, 0.973) |
< 0.0001 0.0172 |
Note: Model was found to be statistically significant. Result of likelihood ratio test: χ2 value - 156.787 and P value < 0.0001. CI indicates confidence Interval. Base case includes patients who were in immediate treatment group, with race white, married, aged 80 or above, with moderately differentiated tumors and with greater than 1 comorbidities.