Table 14: Comparison of the success rates and the sample size of the studies in the literature with the following Thesis.
| Publication | Type of study | Sample size | Success (%) |
| Torres, et al. [34] | Observational prospective | 107 (114 IO) | 100 (114) |
| Tan, et al. [35] | Observational prospective | 42 | 93 (39) |
| Leidel, et al. [5] | Controlled randomized | 40 (B.I.G. + EZ-IO) | 85 (34) |
| Myers, et al. [36] | Retrospective | 60 (62 IO) | 87 (54) |
| Schalk, et al. [14] | Observational prospective | 77 | 97 (75) |
| Gazin, et al. [13] | Observational prospective | 39 | 85 (33) |
| Reades, et al. [37] | Observational prospective | 88 | 69 (61) |
| Sunde, et al. [31] | Retrospective | 49 | 96 (47) |
| Paxton, et al. [4] | Observational prospective | 30 | 97 (29) |
| Frascone, et al. [38] | Observational prospective | 19 | 95 (18) |
| Ong, et al. [39] | Observational prospective | 35 | 100 (35) |
| Horton, et al. [40] | Observational prospective | 95 | 94 (89) |
| Frascone, et al. [41] | Observational prospective | 89 | 88 (78) |
| Davidoff, et al. [19] | Observational prospective | 250 | 97 (242) |
| Gillum, et al. [42] | Observational prospective | 125 | 94 (118) |
| Santos, et al. [15] | Observational prospective | 58 (60 IO) | 90 (54) |
| Studio Padova | Observational prospective | 89 (91 IO) | 96.7 (88) |