Table 2: N = 80. Designs for testing H0:p p0 vs. H1:p > p0 with = 0:05 and power at least 80% at p1 = p0 + 0:15. For each setting the Rows 1-3 contain the Types 1-3 two-stage designs. The left and rights parts are for the first type and second type of optimal designs.

p0 (1stage) 2-stage minimizing EN0 2-stage minimizing n2
Design EN0 n2 P ET0 Design EN0 n2 P ET0
0.1 (24, 4; 26,5) 25.9 26 0.05 (24, 4; 26,5) 25.9 26 0.05
(29; 5) (15, 2; 29,5) 21.5 29 0.53 (15, 2; 29, 5) 21.5 29 0.53
(15, 2, 3; 28, 5) 20.6 28 0.57 (24, 1, 4; 26, 5) 25.8 26 0.1
0.2 (21, 7; 32,9) 31.8 32 0.02 (21, 7; 32,9) 31.8 32 0.02
(36; 10) (17, 4; 33,9) 24.3 33 0.54 (17, 4; 33, 9) 24.3 33 0.54
(17, 4, 7; 33, 9) 24.2 33 0.55 (21, 1, 7; 32, 9) 31.7 32 0.03
0.3 (33, 13; 36,14) 35.9 36 0.04 (33, 13; 36,14) 35.9 36 0.04
(37; 14) (31, 16; 37,14) 27.8 37 0.44 (31, 16; 37, 14) 27.8 37 0.44
(21, 7, 10; 37, 14) 28 37 0.56 (31, 1, 13; 36, 14) 35.9 36 0.04
0.4 (20, 12; 37,18) 36.8 37 0.01 (20, 12; 37,18) 36.8 37 0.01
(39; 19) (22, 9; 39, 19) 31.5 39 0.44 (22, 9; 39, 19) 31.5 39 0.44
(23, 10, 13; 39, 19) 29.7 39 0.57 (20, 1, 12; 37, 18) 36.8 37 0.01
0.5 (21, 14; 39,23) 38.6 39 0.02 (21, 14; 39, 23) 38.6 39 0.02
(39; 23) (26, 15; 38,22) 28.8 38 0.76 (26, 15; 38,22) 28.8 38 0.76
(26, 15, 21; 38, 22) 28.8 38 0.76 (26, 15, 21; 38, 22) 28.8 38 0.76
0.6 (31, 22; 36,25) 35.8 36 0.03 (31, 22; 36,25) 35.8 36 0.03
(38; 26) (21, 14; 38,26) 26.5 38 0.68 (24, 16; 35,24) 27.2 35 0.71
(21, 14, 17; 38, 26) 26.4 38 0.68 (24, 16, 20; 35, 24) 27.2 35 0.71
0.7 (25, 21; 33,26) 32.9 33 0.01 (25, 21; 33, 26) 32.9 33 0.01
(33; 26) (18, 14; 33,26) 22.6 33 0.69 (26, 21; 32,25) 26.7 32 0.89
(18, 14, 16; 33, 26) 22.5 33 0.7 (26, 21, 23; 32, 25) 26.7 32 0.89