Table 4: Improved
IDI after addition of dysglycemia in the three
models.
|
|
Improved
IDI |
CI 95% |
P value |
|
ALL |
|
|
|
|
Model 1 |
0.00739 |
0.00251-0.01227 |
0.003 |
|
Model 2 |
0.00781 |
0.00254-0.01308 |
0.004 |
|
Model 3 |
0.00678 |
0.00172-0.01184 |
0.009 |
|
No DM |
|
|
|
|
Model 1 |
0.02152 |
0.01216-0.03088 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Model 2 |
0.01404 |
0.00628-0.02180 |
< 0.0001 |
|
Model 3 |
0.01080 |
0.00356-0.01804 |
0.004 |
|
Previous
DM |
|
|
|
|
Model 1 |
0.00047 |
(-0.00208)-0.00302 |
0.718 |
|
Model 2 |
0.00083 |
(-0.00253)-0.00418 |
0.628 |
|
Model 3 |
0.00149 |
(-0.00296)-0.00594 |
0.509 |
Model 1: addition of dysglycemia to REMS.
Model 2: addition of dysglycemia to REMS, DM, sex,
sodium, potassium, glomerular filtrate, hemoglobin, thrombocytopenia, and leucocytosis.
Model 3: addition of dysglycemia to REMS, DM, sex,
sodium, potassium, glomerular filtrate, hemoglobin, thrombocytopenia, leucocytosis, and Charlson score.