Table 3: Studies comparing CT-TAP to conventional imaging for detection of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients.
Author | Year | Journal | Imaging modality | Patient group | n | Results: CT TAP | Results: Other |
Mahner et al | 2008 | Annals of oncology | PET, CT, conventional imaging | Locally advanced breast cancer & suspected stage IV disease |
69 |
Sensitivity 83 Specificity 85 |
Conventional 43 98 |
Tanaka et al | 2012 | Oncology Letters | Contrast enhanced CT | Asymptomatic breast cancer patients |
483 | Upstaged disease: Stage 1 0 Stage II 1.9 Stage III 31.3 |
|
Bristow et al | 2007 | The Breast | CT TAP , bone scan | Suspected or confirmed Stage IV disease |
77 |
Sensitivity 97.7 Specificity 100 |
Bone-Scan 100 67.6 |
Total | 619 |