Table 3: Rounding inconsistency analysis for mathematical RfDos and RfCis with 5 as a last decimal figure.
|
Mathematical RfDo decimal value considered |
|
||||
|
number of chemicals without rounding |
number of chemicals rounded up |
(Absolute) arithmetic rounding mean (%) |
number of chemicals rounded down |
(Absolute) arithmetic rounding mean (%) |
|
|
X.5 (e.g., 0.5)
|
25
|
19
|
19.63 |
1 |
14.29 |
|
X.X5 (e.g., 2.15)
|
0
|
8 |
3.57 |
5 |
10.70 |
|
|
|||||
|
Mathematical RfCi decimal value considered |
|
||||
|
number of chemicals without rounding |
number of chemicals rounded up |
(Absolute) arithmetic rounding mean (%) |
number of chemicals rounded down |
(Absolute) arithmetic rounding mean (%) |
|
|
X.5 (e.g., 0.5)
|
0 |
4 |
10.51 |
0 |
--- |
|
X.X5 (e.g., 2.15)
|
0 |
0 |
--- |
0 |
--- |