Table 3: Survey
logistic regression models for the association between outpatient visits and OTC
consumption.*
Effect |
|
Reference |
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
OTC consumption |
|
No OTC |
0.62 (0.55,0.70) |
0.61 (0.54,0.69) |
0.45 (0.39,0.53) |
Gender |
|
Female |
1.41 (1.24,1.60) |
1.05 (0.89,1.25) |
|
Age |
|
|
1.01 (1.00,1.02) |
1.00 (0.99,1.01) |
|
Education level |
Primary school |
No school |
1.19 (1.02,1.38) |
1.13 (0.98,1.29) |
|
Middle school |
|
1.16 (1.00,1.35) |
1.16 (0.98,1.36) |
||
College and above |
|
1.27 (0.79,2.05) |
1.35 (0.81,2.25) |
||
Marital status |
Others |
Married |
1.08 (0.92,1.27) |
1.03 (0.87,1.23) |
|
Place of residence |
Urban |
Rural |
1.05 (0.89,1.24) |
1.13 (0.93,1.38) |
|
Drinking |
More than once/month |
Never |
|
0.66 (0.54,0.81) |
|
|
less than once/month |
|
|
0.98 (0.74,1.30) |
|
Smoking |
Smoking |
Never |
|
0.86 (0.74,1.01) |
|
Quitted |
|
|
1.14 (0.94,1.39) |
||
Income |
1500-12500 |
< 1500 |
|
0.94 (0.81,1.09) |
|
12500-35000 |
|
|
1.03 (0.88,1.22) |
||
> 35000 |
|
|
1.16 (0.95,1.41) |
||
Insurance |
Urban employee medical insurance |
No insurance |
|
1.32 (0.93,1.86) |
|
Urban resident medical insurance |
|
|
0.97 (0.73,1.29) |
||
New cooperative medical insurance |
|
|
1.14 (0.85,1.53) |
||
Self-evaluated health |
Fair |
Good and above |
|
1.59 (1.37,1.86) |
|
Poor and worse |
|
|
2.66 (2.17,3.25) |
||
N of chronic diseases |
|
|
|
1.33 (1.25,1.42) |
|
CESD |
|
|
|
1.03 (1.02,1.04) |
*Model 1 was a univariate model; Model
2 adjusted for gender, age, education level, marital status, and place
of residence (urban/rural); Model 3 also included household incomes, life style
(smoking, drinking), self-reported health status, number of chronic diseases
and depression.