Comparison between two approaches used to validate cBP assesses.

Table 2:Comparison between two approaches used to validate cBP assesses.

Invasive versus oscillometric cBP waves using the entire aortic pressure cycle
	Whole population	Males		Females
Invasive vs. Noninvasive slope	0.77	0.77		0.79
Correlation coefficient	0.88	0.89		0.92
Invasive versus oscillometric cBP waves using the mean value of the aortic pressure cycle^*
	Whole population		Males		Females
Invasive vs. Noninvasive slope	0.98^#		0.74		0.98^£
Correlation coefficient	0.89		0.81		0.93

*Reported values [14] (Sanchez, et al. 2020). cBP: Central blood pressure; #,£: p < 0. 05. ANCOVA between slope calculated by the entire pressure cycle and slope assessed by mean value aortic pressure cycle.