Table 2:Comparison between two approaches used to validate cBP assesses.
Invasive versus oscillometric cBP waves using the entire aortic pressure cycle |
|||||
|
Whole population |
Males |
Females |
||
Invasive vs. Noninvasive slope |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.79 |
||
Correlation coefficient |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
||
Invasive versus oscillometric cBP waves using the mean value of the aortic pressure cycle* |
|||||
Whole population |
Males |
Females |
|||
Invasive vs. Noninvasive slope |
0.98# |
0.74 |
0.98£ |
||
Correlation coefficient |
0.89 |
0.81 |
0.93 |
*Reported values [14] (Sanchez, et al. 2020). cBP: Central blood pressure; #,£: p < 0. 05. ANCOVA between slope calculated by the entire pressure cycle and slope assessed by mean value aortic pressure cycle.