Table 2: Social-cognitive factors relating to the use of research
evidence in clinical practice (n = 293). Means and interquartile range of
scores (IQR), and frequencies and percentages of groups. Items adapted from
Légaré (2014).
Item |
Reported
min-max |
Median |
IQR |
||
Personal assessment of ability to use research
evidence (1-7 = Very low ability-…Very high ability) |
1-7 |
5 |
3-6 |
||
Low ability (1-3) Intermediate ability (4-5) High ability (6-7) |
n = 73 n = 132 n = 88 |
25% 45% 30% |
|
|
|
Perceived
value of research evidence for clinical practice (1-7 = Very
low value-…Very high value) |
2-7 |
6 |
5-7 |
||
Low value (1-4) High value (5-7) |
n = 24 n = 269 |
8% 92% |
|
|
|
Intention to use research evidence in the future (1-7 = Never…Always) |
1-7 |
6 |
5-7 |
||
Low intention (1-3) Intermediate intention (4-5) High intention (6-7) |
n = 22 n = 99 n =150 |
8% 23% 69% |
|
|
|
Estimated use of research evidence by respected
colleague (1-7 = Never…Always) |
1-7 |
5 |
4-6 |
||
Seldom (1-3) Moderately often (4-5) Often or always (6-7) |
n = 44 n = 99 n = 150 |
15% 34% 51% |
|
|
|
Estimated percentage of peers using research evidence (20% intervals) |
1-5 |
4 |
3-4 |
||
Low percentage of peers (0-40%) Intermediate percentage of peers (60-80%) High percentage of peers (80-100%) |
n = 58 n = 165 n = 70 |
20% 56% 24% |
|
|
|