Table 3: Two large scale comparative analysis on the outcomes in elderly with CSM.
| Outcomes Madhavan, et al. [58] (N = 2868) Veeravagu, et al. [51] (N = 35,962) | ||
| Operative time | Similar operative times between elderly and nonelderly groups | |
| Blood loss | Elderly had less blood loss compared to nonelderly | |
| JOA scores | Elderly had lower pre-op and post-op scores compared to nonelderly | |
| Recovery rates | Elderly had lower recovery rates | |
| LOS in hospital | Elderly had longer LOS | |
| Cervical Cobb angle | Elderly had smaller pre-post-op Cobb angles compared to nonelderly | |
| Spinal canal diameter | Elderly had greater post-op diameter | |
| Complication rates | No significant difference between Significantly higher elderly and nonelderly complication rates in the elderly compared to nonelderly following ACDF and posterior fusion | |
| 30-day readmission rates | Lower readmission rates in the elderly compared to nonelderly | |
CSM: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; JOA: Japanese orthopaedic association; Pre-op: Pre-operative; Post-op: Post-operative; LOS: length of stay ; ACDF = Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.