Citation

Beresford SAA, Bowen DJ, Littman AJ, Albano DL, Chan KCG, et al. (2019) Relationship of Socioeconomic Status Indicators to Obesity in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Middle-Aged Women: A Population Study. Int J Womens Health Wellness 5:090. doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510090

Citation

Beresford SAA, Bowen DJ, Littman AJ, Albano DL, Chan KCG, et al. (2019) Relationship of Socioeconomic Status Indicators to Obesity in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Middle-Aged Women: A Population Study. Int J Womens Health Wellness 5:090. doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510090

RESEARCH ARTICLE | OPEN ACCESSDOI: 10.23937/2474-1353/1510090

Relationship of Socioeconomic Status Indicators to Obesity in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Middle-Aged Women: A Population Study

Shirley AA Beresford 1,2*, Deborah J Bowen3, Alyson J Littman1,4,5, Denise L Albano1,2, KC Gary Chan6, Shelby L Langer7, Wendy E Barrington8,1 and Donald L Patrick9,2

1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

2Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutch, Seattle, USA

3Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

4Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (ERIC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, USA

5Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, USA

6Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

7Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

8Department of Psychosocial & Community Health, Washington, Seattle, USA

9Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Abstract

Background

Obesity rates differ between Hispanic and White (non-Hispanic) women in the United States, with higher rates among Hispanic women. Socioeconomic processes contribute to this disparity both at the individual and the environmental level. Understanding these complex relationships requires multilevel analyses within cohorts of women that have a shared environment. In population-based samples of Hispanic and White (non-Hispanic) women from the same neighborhoods, we evaluated within each ethnic group a) The association of individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) with body mass index (BMI); and b) The additional contribution of neighborhood-level measures of SES.

Methods

Using population-based multi-stage sampling methods, we oversampled low SES and Hispanic block groups. During household screening, we identified women aged 30 to 50 years. Among White women, we specifically oversampled women with low educational levels. 515 Hispanic and 503 White women completed baseline. Height and weight were measured. Baseline surveys, in Spanish and English, included four measures of SES. Three measures of area-level SES were examined. Analysis of loge BMI on each SES measure used linear mixed models, incorporating design effects.

Results

Among White women, low education, social status, and neighborhood SES were associated with higher BMI (p < 0.001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.05, respectively), independent of other SES measures. Although the highest grouped category of education, income and subjective social status within the Hispanic cohort had the lowest mean estimated BMI, the point estimates across categories were not monotonic, and had wide confidence intervals. As a result, in contrast to the findings among White women, no statistically significant associations were found between BMI and measures of SES among Hispanic women.

Discussion

Neighborhood and individual measures of SES operate differently in Hispanic compared with White women. We had assumed the measures we included to be most salient and operate similarly for both groups of women. Rather the salient factors for Hispanic women have yet to be identified. Improved understanding may ultimately inform the design of culturally-relevant multilevel obesity prevention strategies.