Citation

Kerrouch H, Titou H, Frikh R, Boui M, Hjira N (2023) Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis at a Moroccan Referral Hospital. J Dermatol Res Ther 9:119. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5750/1510119

Research Article | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5750/1510119

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis at a Moroccan Referral Hospital

Hasna Kerrouch*, Hicham Titou, Rachid Frikh, Mohammed Boui and Naoufal Hjira

Dermatology Venerology Department, Military Hospital Instruction Mohammed V, University Mohammed V, Morocco

Abstract

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe mucocutaneous reaction mainly due to drugs. Few studies have focused on this medical emergency. This study aims is to describe the epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment outcomes of the patients with SJS/TEN.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to the Military Hospital of Instruction Mohamed V, Rabat Morocco, between September 2013 and June 2022. We included 34 patients. Data collected from medical records included: Age at admission, gender, diagnosis, causative drugs, comorbidities, treatment, and outcomes.

Results: A total of 34 patients including 18(52.9%) of SJS, 2(5.8%) SJS/TEN overlap, and 14(41.1%) of TEN were enrolled. A total of 55.8% were female, and the average age was 53.6 +/- 14.8 years. 88.2% of patients had concurrent medical conditions. Antibiotics were the most common causative drug followed by carbamazepine and allopurinol. All patients were admitted to the hospital, 5.8% of them had complications during hospitalization, 8.8% had long-term complication, and 14.5% were dead.

Conclusion: The most common causative drug was antibiotics followed by carbamazepine and allopurinol.

Keywords

Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Toxic epidermal necrolysis, Culprit drugs, Comorbiditis, Mortality

Introduction

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare, severe mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction affecting 2.6 to 13 cases per million persons per year [1]. SJS and TEN seem to have the same clinical and pathological spectrum, differing only by the percentage of body surface epidermal detachment. Whereas less than 10% of body surface area (BSA) involvement classified under SJS, SJS/TEN overlap falls under 10-30% BSA involvement, while more than 30% BSA involvement defines TEN [2].

Medications such as antibiotics, allopurinol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and aromatic anticonvulsants are the most frequently incriminated triggers with the highest risk of onset occurring within the initial weeks of treatment, ranging from 7 to 21 days [3]. Groups with higher risk of developing SJS/TEN include those with immunosuppression, especially those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and mycoplasma, older age, slow acetylator genotypes, and individuals with specific HLA alleles [4,5].

The symptoms of SJS/TEN begin 1-4 weeks after drug exposure with the onset of prodromal symptoms - fever, cough, sore throat, and rhinorrhea - followed by a cutaneous eruption characterized by erythematous macules, atypical target lesions, blister formation, ocular, oral, or genital mucosal involvement, and progression to erosions [6]. The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN is incompletely understood, therefore the optimal treatment regimens for patients have yet to be fully elucidated.

This retrospective study aims to study the epidemiology, clinical, and treatment outcomes in patients with SJS/TEN within Moroccan population.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively conducted a chart review of SJS/TEN patients that were treated in our Military hospital of instruction Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco between September 2013 and June 2022. Data collected from medical records included: Age at admission, gender, diagnosis, causative drugs, comorbidities, and treatment. Initial diagnoses of SJS/TEN were made by dermatologists. Skin biopsies were performed in all patients and clinical pictures of skin lesions were available in order to validate SJS/TEN cases. We included in this study all patients with confirmed diagnoses of SJS, SJS/TEN overlap, or TEN based on Bastugi's criteria [2]. We excluded patients without available medical records for clinical course and relevant laboratory data. Culprit drugs were identified based on ALDEN score [7].

Data collection and statistical analysis were done using JAMOVI 2.2.5 current. Descriptive statistics were performed, and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

A total of thirty-four patients including 18 (52.9%) of SJS, 2 (5.8%) SJS/TEN overlap, and 14 (41.1%) of TEN were enrolled (Table 1). The average age was 53.6 +/- 14.8 years. Of the thirty-four cases, 55.8% were female and 44.1% were male, with a female to male ratio of 1.2. The majority of the patients (88.2%) had concurrent medical conditions. The most common conditions were hypertension (47%), diabetes mellitus (32.3%), hyperlipemia (26.4%), tuberculosis (26.4%), and gout (20.5%) (Table 2).

Table 1: Patient characteristics. View Table 1

Table 1: Patient characteristics. View Table 2

The most frequent culprit drug was antibiotics (29.4%), followed by carbamazepine (23.5%) and allopurinol (11.7%) (Figure 1). The time of latency was between 8-21 days in 70.5% of patients and all patients were admitted to the hospital, with a mean duration of hospitalization of 14 ± 9 days.

Figure 1: The frequency of culprit drugs. View Figure 1

The SCORTEN score was calculated for all the patients and ranged from 0 to 5. Deaths occurred for SCORTEN > 2.

All patients had mucosal involvement, 47% had also ophthalmic involvement, and 38.2% had fever 5.8% of patients had complications during hospitalization, 8.8% had long-term complications and 14.5% were dead.

Results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in the initial dosage and the total dosage of corticosteroids between the SJS group and the TEN groups (p < 0.001), and there were significant differences also in the duration of hospitalization between the SJS group and the TEN group (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in time of medication consumption to onset of symptoms between the SJS group and the TEN groups (p = 0.38) (Table 3).

Table 3 : Patient's clinical findings and kind of treatment. View Table 3

Discussion

TEN and SJS are a rare and severe cutaneous reaction, most often secondary to drug reactions [8,9]. It is one of the serious dermatological diseases that constitute a true medical emergency. Our study aims to describe the epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment outcomes of patients with SJS/TEN.

In our study, affected patients had a mean age of 53.6 years +/- 14.8, with a female predominance which matches with other studies [10,11]. However, some studies have reported a male preponderance [12,13].

Even if SJS and TEN are considered to take part of a similar clinical continuum, we found that cases of SJS (52.9%) were more reported than those of TEN (41.1%) which consistent with previous studies [3]. SJS/TEN could be caused by infections such as mycoplasma pneumonia and herpes simplex virus but are predominantly drug induced. We found in our study that antibiotics were the most implicated, followed by carbamazepine, in agreement with a previous moroccan study and a multicenter study in the United States [14,15]. However, In the Asian population, the most frequent culprit medication was antiepileptic drugs followed by antibiotics [16].

Several risk factors have been identified, including genetic susceptibility associated with specific HLA alleles, the coexistence of cancer, older age, and race/ethnicity [17,18]. The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN is still unknown. Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain the abnormal immune response due to the recognition and secretion of granulysin by cytotoxic CD8 T-cells, natural killer cells and the Fas-FasL interaction after exposure to certain drug metabolites which lead to keratinocyte apoptosis [19].

SJS/TEN begins within 4 weeks after a first exposure to the causative drug and a few days if reexposure to the same causative drug [20]. The severity of SJS/TEN depends on the extended of the skin detachment. It can be determined by using clinical and histological funding. Clinically, SCORTEN is a score developed to stratify the severity and predict mortality that has been validated for use on days 1 and 3 post admission [21,22]. Histologically, the extent of dermal mononuclear inflammation can be used to predict the clinical Outcome [23].

In our study, the average mortality rate was 14.5%, which was similar to mortality rate reported in the United State and in a previous Moroccan study [14,24]. The treatment consists of a multidisciplinary approach. It is based on the recognisation and retreat of the Culprit Drug, supportive care, and medical treatment. In our institution, all patients received early supportive care including airway protection, fluid replacement, nutrition and psychological support, pain management, thermoregulation, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. No consensus for the management of SJS/TEN is available, due probably to the low number of cases [3,8].

Several therapies were suggested for the medical management of SJS/TEN, including intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, systemic Corticosteroids, and TNF Inhibitors [25,26]. Based on the European Study of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, all our cases received systemic corticosteroids (intravenous methylprednisolone) with a good clinical course [27,28]. However, some studies suggested that corticosteroids were associated with infection, increase in mortality rate, and duration of hospitalization [29,30]. The use of intravenous immunoglobulins and cyclosporine is still controversial [10,31,32].

The strength of our study included the detailed reporting of clinical data of the patients, but it was limited by its low prevalence rate and retrospective design.

Conclusion

SJS/TEN are rare and constitute a medical emergency caused mainly by drugs. An early recognition of the culprit drugs and an expedited initiation of supportive care lead to lifesaving. However, more research are needed to establish an international consensus for the management of patients with SJS/TEN.

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding sources received.

References

  1. Hsu DY, Brieva J, Silverberg NB, Silverberg JI (2016) Morbidity and mortality of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in United States adults. J Invest Dermatol 136: 1387-1397.
  2. Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern RS, Shear NH, Naldi L, et al. (1993) Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol 129: 92-96.
  3. French LE (2006) Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens Johnson syndrome: our current understanding. Allergol Int 55: 9-16.
  4. Chung WH, Hung SI, Hong HS, Hsih MS, Yang LC, et al. (2004) Medical genetics: A marker for Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nature 428: 486.
  5. Mittmann N, Knowles SR, Koo M, Shear NH, Rachlis A, et al. (2012) Incidence of toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in an HIV cohort: An observational, retrospective case series study. Am J Clin Dermatol 13: 49-54.
  6. Dodiuk-Gad RP, Chung W-H, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Shear NH (2015) Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol 16: 475-493.
  7. Sassolas B, Haddad C, Mockenhaupt M, Dunant A, Liss Y, et al. (2010) ALDEN, an algorithm for assessment of drug causality in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Comparison with case-control analysis.Clin Pharmacol Ther 88: 60-68.
  8. Mockenhaupt M (2011) The current understanding of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 7: 803-815.
  9. Fu M, Gao Y, Pan Y, Wei L, Liao W, et al. (2012) Recovered patients with StevensJohson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis maintain longlived IFN-c and sFasL memory response. PLoS One 7: e45516.
  10. Miliszewski MA, Kirchhof MG, Sikora S, Papp A, Dutz JP (2016) Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: an analysis of triggers and implications for improving prevention. Am J Med 129: 1221-1225.
  11. Zajicek R, Pintar D, Broz L, Suca H, Königova R (2012) Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome at the Prague Burn Centre 1998-2008. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26: 639-643.
  12. Firoz BF, Henning JS, Zarzabal LA, Pollock BH (2012) Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Five years of treatment experience from a burn unit. J Am Acad Dermatol 67: 630-635.
  13. Nizamoglu M, Ward JA, Frew Q, Gerrish H, Martin N, et al. (2018) Improving mortality outcomes of Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: A regional burns centre experience. Burns 44: 603-611.
  14. Moutaouakkil Y, el Jaoudi R, Serragui S, Cherrah Y, Lamsaouri J, et al. (2020) Retrospective analysis of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions over a period of 6 years. Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists 30: 544-549.
  15. Strom BL, Carson JL, Halpern AC, Schinnar R, Snyder ES, et al. (1991) A population-based study of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Incidence and antecedent drug exposures. Arch Dermatol 127: 831-838.
  16. Wang Y-H, Chen C-B, Tassaneeyakul W, Saito Y, Aihara M, et al. (2019) The medication risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Asians: the major drug causality and comparison with the US FDA label. Clin Pharmacol Ther 105: 112-120.
  17. Aguiar D, Pazo R, Duran I, Terrasa J, Arrivi A, et al. (2004) Toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients receiving anticonvulsants and cranial irradiation: A risk to consider. J Neurooncol 66: 345-350.
  18. Su SC, Chung WH (2014) Cytotoxic proteins and therapeutic targets in severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Toxins 6: 194-210.
  19. Viard I, Wehrli P, Bullani R, Schneider P, Holler N, et al. (1998) Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin. Science 282: 490-493.
  20. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Halevy S, Bavinck J, et al. (2008) Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Investig Dermatol 128: 35-44.
  21. Guegan S, Bastuji-Garin S, Poszepczynska-Guign E, Roujeau J, Revuz J, et al. (2006) Performance of the SCORTEN during the first five days of hospitalization to predict the prognosis of epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol 126: 272-276.
  22. Trent JT, Kirsner RS, Romanelli P, Kerdel FA (2004) Use of SCORTEN to accurately predict mortality in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis in the United States. Arch Dermatol 140: 890-892.
  23. Quinn AM, Brown K, Bonish BK, Curry J, Gordon KB, et al. (2005) Uncovering histologic criteria with prognostic significance in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 141: 683-687.
  24. Micheletti RG, Chiesa-Fuxench Z, Noe MH, Stephen S, Aleshin M, et al. (2018) StevensJohnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: A multicenter retrospective study of 377 adult patients from the United States. J Invest Dermatol 138: 2315-2321.
  25. Corrick F, Anand G (2013) Question 2: Would systemic steroids be useful in the management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome? Arch Dis Child 98: 828-830.
  26. Zhang J, Lu CW, Chen CB, Wang CW, JI C, et al. (2022) Evaluation of combination therapy with etanercept and systemic corticosteroids for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A multicenter observational study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 10: 1295-1304.
  27. Schneck J, Fagot JP, Sekula P, Sassolas B, Roujeau JC, et al. (2008) Effects of treatments on the mortality of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A retrospective study on patients included in the prospective EuroSCAR study. J Am Acad Dermatol 58: 33-40.
  28. Dodiuk-Gad RP, Chung WH, Yang CH, Lu CW, Chung-Yee Hui R, et al. (2014) The 8th International Congress on Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions, Taiwan, 2013: Focus on severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Drug Saf 37: 459-464.
  29. Ginsburg CM (1982) Stevens-Johnson syndrome in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1: 155-158.
  30. Halebian PH, Corder VJ, Madden MR, Finklestein JL, Shires GT (1986) Improved burn center survival of patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis managed without corticosteroids. Ann Surg 204: 503-512.
  31. Momin SB (2009) Review of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of stevens-johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2: 51-58.
  32. Mittmann N, Chan BC, Knowles S, Shear NH (2007) IVIG for the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis. Skin Therapy Lett 12: 7-9.

Citation

Kerrouch H, Titou H, Frikh R, Boui M, Hjira N (2023) Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis at a Moroccan Referral Hospital. J Dermatol Res Ther 9:119. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5750/1510119