Citation

Babatola OH, Popoola RO, Olatubi MI, Adewoyin FR (2022) Patients' Satisfaction with Health Care Services in Selected Secondary Health Care Facilities in Ondo State, Nigeria. J Fam Med Dis Prev 8:145. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510145

Original Article | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5793/1510145

Patients' Satisfaction with Health Care Services in Selected Secondary Health Care Facilities in Ondo State, Nigeria

Oyebola Helen Babatola, MSc1, Rabiu O. Popoola, PhD1, Matthew Idowu Olatubi, MSc2* and Folasade Rukayat Adewoyin, MSc3

1Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria

2Department of Nursing Science, Bowen University, Nigeria

3Faculty of Nursing Science, University of Medical Sciences, Nigeria

Abstract

Aim/Objective

This study assessed patient's satisfaction with health care services, and identifies factors associated with the satisfaction of patients in selected health care facilities in Ondo State.

Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional research design was utilized in three selected hospitals in Ondo State. Multi-stage random sampling was used to recruits 121 patients from three hospitals. Structured Questionnaire whose validity and reliability was established was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used.

Results

More than half of the participants, (63.6%) were very satisfied health care services provided by the medical and nursing team with mean score of 32.63 ± 3.64. Only 53.7% of patients that participated in this study were very satisfied with their experience of nursing care. The strongest factor associated with satisfaction with health care was found to be clean hospital environment (3.45 ± 0.5), followed by electricity supply (3.18 ± 0.78), accessibility (3.16 ± 0.58), and availability of adequate seating facility (3.15 ± 0.76). There is a significant relationship between participants satisfaction with health care services and there level of education (f = 6.27; p = 0.01); and occupation (f = 9.80; p = 0.01)'. Urban dwellers (134.38 ± 10.40) were more satisfied than rural dweller (128.72 ± 11.8; t = 2.28; p = 0.02) (OR 3.171, 95% CI 1.33-7.55).

Conclusion

Gender, level of education and occupation are predictors of satisfaction with health care services. Health care providers need to work on their health care delivery to improve care recipient satisfaction with care.

Keywords

Hospital facilities, Medical care, Nursing care, Patients, Patients' satisfaction

Introduction

Patients' satisfaction with health care services is becoming an essential factor in health promotion, when patients are satisfied with healthcare services, it will enhance quick recovery, patronage to the hospital will increase resulting in more funds for service provision and medical tourism will reduce. Also, satisfaction with care is an essential tool in the monitoring of the quality of health care [1,2]. Also, the quality of care given to a patient can be influenced by patient's attitude to the health caregiver, and the caregiver's previous experiences with the patient [3]. Satisfaction with care is predictive of likelihood of patient to continue to use healthcare facility and adhere to medical advice and determinant of overall care coverage and effectiveness [4]. Also, interprofessional collaboration had been documented to positively influence patient satisfaction with healthcare [5].

The quality of health care services has great impact on patients' satisfaction [6]. Onyeonoro, et al. [7] describe satisfaction with care to imply the degree of agreement between patient's perception of the care received and their expectation from the care relationship [7]. Health care utilization had been found to be influenced by patient's satisfaction with care [8,9]. In the words of Manzoor, et al. [10], patient's satisfaction is the state of pleasure or happiness that the patients experience while using the health facility. Patients compare their perception of the care received with their expectation to give a judgment of their level of satisfaction. This made patient satisfaction care to be subjective from the patient's point of view. Goyal, et al. submitted that when patients are not satisfied with the care received, they are likely to seek health care elsewhere [9]. They further suggested that satisfaction with care may be a strong determinant of succeeding health-related behaviour and compliance with treatment and health outcome.

Feysia, et al. opined that due to inadequate nurse population ratio, scarcity of resources, incompetence and ineffective healthcare system, satisfaction with nursing care in Sub-Sahara Africa is low [11]. In Ethiopia, Eyasu, et al. documented that satisfaction with nursing care was low while Sharew, et al. submitted that only half of the patients in their study were satisfied with nursing care [12,13]. Previous studies in Nigeria had documented different level of satisfaction with nursing care among different categories of patient: among patients with prostate cancer [14]; among patients living with schizophrenia [15]; among HIV patient in the outpatient department [16]; among perinatal women [17]; and among antenatal women [18].

Only a few studies had assessed clients' satisfaction with health care generally in Nigeria. Osiya, et al. compared patients' satisfaction with health care in the tertiary and primary level of health care in Port Harcourt [4]. On the other hand Akinyinka, et al. [19] conducted a community-based study to assess people's satisfaction with health care services in Nigeria [20]. Little is known about satisfaction with health care services provided in the secondary level of health care system in Nigeria. Also, the focus had been on assessing satisfaction with nursing care in particular categories of patient or clinics in the hospital [17,18]. Secondary level of healthcare in refers to hospitals that provide middle level of healthcare usually with general medical practitioners. They serve as referral centre for primary health care centres. This study, therefore, provides a modest attempt to assess satisfaction with health care services in the secondary level of health care system in Ondo State.

Objective of the Study

This study assessed the level of patients' satisfaction with health care delivered by the medical and nursing team, assessed patients experiences with nursing care and identify factors associated with the satisfaction of patients in selected secondary health care facilities in Ondo State, Nigeria. Secondary level facilities are hospitals with majorly general practitioners. There are usually no specialist cares rendered in this level of hospital.

Methodology

The study adopts a descriptive cross sectional research design. The study was carried out to assess patients' satisfaction with health care services in selected secondary health care facilities in Ondo State. Multi-staged random sampling was used to select 121 patients from three hospitals in the three senatorial districts in Ondo State. Ondo state is made up of three senatorial districts (Northern senatorial district, central senatorial district and southern senatorial district). Each of the senatorial district has six secondary health care facilities. The first stage of selection involved selecting one secondary health care facility each from each senatorial district using the ballot system. Therefore, General Hospital Owo was selected for norther senatorial district, General Hospital Igbara-Oke for Central Senatorial District and General Hospital Ore for southern senatorial district. In each of the health facility selected, the facility was cluster into patients wards/units and three wards/units were randomly selected using simple ballot. In each of the wards/units systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit clients that eventually participated in the study.

Sample size was calculated using Karish formula for opinion surveys for population less than 10,000 [21], using prevalence rate of 0.88 from previous study [22]. Therefore, sample size of 163 was arrived at, after data collection and sorting of questionnaires only 121 questionnaires were returned satisfactorily filled giving response rate of 74.2%.

A self-structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The questionnaire was developed from literature and had been successfully used in previous studies [13,23-28]. The questionnaire consists of five sections. The first section consist of eight (8) items that elicit information about socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. The second section consists of 10 items on patient satisfaction level with medical and nursing care services. The total mark obtainable is "40" while the least is "10". The mean score (32.64) was used to categorised satisfaction with services delivered by nurses and doctors into "fully satisfied" and "fully unsatisfied". The third section asks questions on patient satisfaction about nursing care services. It is a ten 4-point Likert scale type questions. The total mark obtainable is "40" while the least is "10". The mean score (32.41) was used to categorised satisfaction with nursing care into "fully satisfied" and "fully unsatisfied".

The fourth section asked question about respondents' satisfaction with the facilities and services provided in the hospital. It consists of 11 items of 4-point Likert questions. The total mark obtainable if 44 while the least is 11. Higher score represent high level of satisfaction with facilities and services provided in the hospital. The mean score (32.24) was used to categorised satisfaction with facilities and services in the hospital into "fully satisfied" and "fully unsatisfied". The fifth section of the question which consists of 10 items seeks to assess the overall level of satisfaction of respondents with health care delivery services. The mean score (30.43) was used to categorised satisfaction with health care delivery services in the hospital into "fully satisfied" and "fully unsatisfied".

Validity of the questionnaire was ascertained using face and content validity criteria. The questionnaire was pilot tested in General Hospital Idanre by administering the questionnaire to 12 patients using split-half methods and their responses was correlated using Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, the instrument yielded a Cronbach Alpha score of 0.84. The questionnaire is adjudged reliable. Permission was sought from the authority of the tertiary hospitals while informed consent was sought and gained from all respondents.

The three selected hospital were entered through the Medical Director of each of the hospital. The details of the research was explain to then in detail. This is after approval had been sought and gained from management of Ondo State Ministry of Health. Meetings were schedule with the Head of Nursing Services of the each hospital to familiarize them with the study and sought their approval and cooperation. The researchers also meet with the head of nursing in each of the wards selected for the study. Ethical approval was sought from Research committee of Ondo State Ministry of Health which is the supervisory agency for all government hospitals in the state. The study was approved by the Medical Director of all the hospital where the study was done. Written and verbal consent was sought and gained from all participants in the study. The study procedures were explained to them in details.

Data was collected using questionnaires that were given to patients on selected wards and units in each of the selected hospital after the study had been properly explained to them and their informed consent sought and gained. Questionnaire administration was done by one of the authors who is registered nurse with over ten years' experience in data collection and research. The process of data collection took 12 weeks. Filled questionnaires were retrieved and sort for analysis. Sorting of questionnaire was done by one of the authors. Only questionnaires that are satisfactory filled were analyzed. Data was entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences data sheet and checked by independent data analyst.

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 21) was used to analyze data. Research questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, percentages and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Independent t-test. Analysis of Variance was used to determining defences in the level of satisfaction with health care services among participants with tertiary, secondary and primary level of education. Also, independent t-test to determine differences in the level of satisfaction with healthcare between participants living in the rural and urban areas.

Results

Table 1 shows that the demographic distribution of respondents revealed that 75 (62%) of the respondents are male. The age distribution shows that 32 (26.4%) of the respondents are within the ages of 18-32 years, while a little above half 65 (53.7%) were 58 years and above. Also results from the table showed that more than half of the clients that participated in this study were married 62 (51.2%) while only 21 (17.4%) had tertiary level of education. Results further showed that that 34 (28.1%) are public workers, 29 (24%) are Artisan, 11 (9.1%) are farmers, and 30 (24.8%) are professionals. The residence distribution shows that 86 (71.1%) stayed in the rural areas. On the respondents patronage to the hospital, 32 (26.4) of the respondents have patronized the hospital for a period less than 2 years, 22 (18.2%) patronage falls within 2-5 years, 39 (32.2%) patronage falls within 5-10 years, while 28 (23.1%) have patronized the hospital for a period more than 10 years.

Table 1: Demographic Distribution of the respondents. View Table 1

Satisfaction with medical and nursing care among participants in this study as shown in Table 2 revealed that 62 (51.2%) of the clients that participated in this study are fully satisfied with health care services they receive, while 59 (48.8%) are fully unsatisfied.

Table 2: Patients' satisfaction with health care services delivered by health workers. View Table 2

The mean satisfaction score was found to be 32.63 ± 3.64. Table 3 revealed the respondents' view of nursing care services. Results from the table showed that, on average, the respondents'opined that the nurses spent enough time with them (mean = 3.1901), that the nurses are capable of their job (mean = 3.19) and that there is always a nurse around when needed (mean = 3.5).

Table 3: Patient's experiences with nursing care provided in selected health care facilities. View Table 3

Clients that participated in the study also opined that nurses come quickly to attend to them when they call on them (mean = 3.46). Participants said they mostly feel at home with the nursing services rendered (mean = 3.08), and that nurses explain things to them (mean = 3.24).

Respondents' view on the factors that determine their selection of healthcare facilities was presented in Table 4. Results as presented in the table showed that respondents think that the admission procedure is not easy (mean = 2.7). However, majority agreed that the hospital environment is clean (mean = 3.45). Participants were also satisfied with availability of seats at the hospital (mean = 3.15). Also, clients that participated in the study were satisfied with the location of the hospital as they believed the hospitals are accessible (mean = 3.16). However, majority opined that services in the hospital are not affordable (mean = 2.43). The respondents are also of the view that their relatives does not find it easy to buy drugs (mean = 2.76). Participants were satisfied with the supply of electricity supply to the wards (mean = 3.18), however some were not satisfied with water supply to the wards (mean = 2.26).

Table 4: Factors that determine patients' selection of health care facilities. View Table 4

Overall in terms of satisfaction with health care facilities, results showed that 59 (48.8%) were fully satisfied with the health care facilities. Those that were fully unsatisfied were found to be 62 (51.2%). The mean score of the participants was found to be 32.24 ± 5.96 (Table 5).

Table 5: Level of Satisfaction with Health Care Facilities. View Table 5

Participants with tertiary level of education in this study were more satisfied with health care services they received (134.14 ± 3.85) compared to others with secondary (130.91 ± 8.31) and primary (122.52 ± 20.78) level of education (f = 6.27; p = 0.01). Also, there is a significant relationship between occupation and patient's satisfaction with health care services (f = 9.80; p = 0.01). Urban dwellers (134.38 ± 10.40) were more satisfied than rural dweller (128.72 ± 11.8; t = 2.28; p = 0.02) (Table 6).

Table 6: Overall Level of Satisfaction among participants. View Table 6

The odd of urban dwellers been fully satisfied with healthcare services in the selected secondary teaching hospitals was 3.171 higher than that of the rural dwellers (Table 7).

Table 7: Logistic Regression Model Showing Relationship between Place of residence and overall satisfaction with care. View Table 7

Discussion

Determinants of satisfaction with health care services may be related to the behaviour and attitude of the health care workers that attend to patient's health care needs. Supporting this assertion, Feysia, et al. posited that the level of competence of health workers influence patients satisfaction with health care [11]. This is further corroborated with the submission of, Akinyinka, et al. in a study in Lagos Nigeria that level of confidence in health workers influence the level of satisfaction with care [20]. In this study, we found out that more than half of the participants were satisfied with health care professional service delivery (doctor and nurses). The study also documented that one third only described their services has been fair.

The most satisfied aspect of doctors and nurses work in the hospital according to the participants in this study is the fact that they work together as a team (mean score 3.73 ± 0.45); followed that the fact that nurses ensure that patients take medication as prescribed (3.43 ± 0.59) and that doctors are considerate in their approach to treatment cost (3.43 ± 0.54). However, least satisfied with was found to be patients perceived capacity of the doctors (2.80 ± 0.71) and not getting attention of doctors early enough when they get to the hospital (3.26 ± 0.84). The reason for this might not unconnected with the fact that there are usually few doctors to attend to many patients in secondary level of hospitals in Nigeria. This is closely related to earlier submission of Akinyinka, et al. that waiting time is one of those important factors that make patients to be dissatisfied with health care workers [20]. This further exposed the inadequacy of the number of health workers in our health care facility and present how to reduce the patients waiting time, this help in improving the quality of health care services in our hospital. Also Feysia, et al. earlier found out that inadequate health worker population ration and level of competence affect patient satisfaction with health care services [11]. This is further emphasized in this study. Waiting time is one of the strong indicators of patient/clients satisfaction with care.

Nurses account for the large percentage of health care workers in many hospitals. In some hospitals, this proportion can account for as high as 70% of the total health professionals in the hospital. This is because of their important roles in patients care. Nurses are the only set of health professional that care for the patients throughout their period of hospitalization. Other usually comes when their services are needed and go. This made interaction with nurses and level of patients' satisfaction with care they received from them an important determinant, if not the most important is assessing their level of satisfaction with during hospitalization or during period of accessing care in health care facilities.

Level of satisfaction of patients in this study with nursing care was found to be on average (mean 32.41 ± 3.24). Only 53.7% of the study population were very satisfied with nursing services that they receive in the hospital. This is lower to the submission of [29] that (63.9%) of patients that participated in their study described nursing care services that they received in the hospital as excellent. This is lower than level of satisfaction recorded among patients in previous studies in different countries, 82.7% in Malaysia, [30], 73%in India, [31]. However close to 54.8% reported in Turkey [32], 57.8% in the Philippines [33], and slightly higher than 51.7% in Serbia, [34]. Our results showed that only half of the patients are satisfied with the nursing care they received. The difference in the results of this study and those of previous study might be due to the fact that while previous studies were done in urban setting our study was in rural area. In another related study among patients in tertiary level of hospital in an urban city in Nigeria, Omorogbe, [35] documented high level of satisfaction among the sampled patients.

Results of this study are closely related to the level of satisfaction with nursing care of between 25 to 60% among patients living with schizophrenia [15]. However, in another previous studies in Nigeria, Paul and Ugwu, documented 73.68% among HIV patient in outpatient department [16]; Odetola and Fakorede, documented between 94% to 98% among perinatal women [17]. Onyeajam, et al. reported 90% level of satisfaction with ante natal care among ante natal women [18]. This difference in the result of this study and previous study in Nigeria might be probably due to the fact that Paul and Ugwu, [16] and Onyeajam, et al. [18] studies were carried out among patients in the out patients clinic while this study involve patients in the different units and wards of the hospital. Also, expected outcome of the hospitalization or client's engagement with the nurses might also determine their perception of their level of satisfaction with health care service [8,9,36]. This might account for the difference in the results of our study and those conducted in maternity units of the hospitals.

In the case of the nurses, availability all the time was found to be the most satisfied with among the participant (mean score 3.50 ± 0.50), this is closely followed by their perceived level of competence on their job (3.34% ± 0.47) and fact that they explained thing to the patients (3.23 ± 0.56). This further emphasized the importance of healthcare workers availability in enhancing patients' satisfaction with care. Why participants in this study rated nurses high in terms of availability to attend to their needs they rated doctors low. The reason for this might be due to 24 hours shift run by nurses which made them available at all times while doctors are usually only available during the morning shift and on call for emergency purposes.

Participants in this study also score the nurses high on the fact that they are friendly and accommodating (3.23 ± 0.57) and checking on them to see to their welfare (3.20 ± 0.40). However, participants scored the nurses low because they hardly listen to their worries and concerns (3.00 ± 0.55). This shows that although the nurses are physically available, the participants opined that they are not emotionally available to attend to their emotional needs. This is closely related to what had been previously documented in the literature. Schofield, et al. proposed that providing emotional support and empathy are some of the importance services that influenced patients satisfaction with nursing care [37].

In this study, the most important factors that determine patients' satisfaction with health care services received was found to be the cleanliness of the environment, followed by availability of adequate seat in the hospital and electricity supply. This is closely related to the findings of Akinyinka, et al. in a study conducted among clients receiving care in selected hospitals in Lagos Nigeria [20]. Participants in their study rated the hospital they received care from as been clean and they emphasized their satisfaction with cleanliness of the hospitals. This is further corroborated by Paul and Ugwu, who conducted their study among patients in South-south zone of Nigeria [16].

Patients also rate the location of the hospital, availability of laboratory for investigations, and adequacy of bathing and toilet facilities in the hospital as an important determinant of their satisfaction with the care they received from the hospital. This is closely related to what Feysia, et al. described as resources and effectiveness of health care services [11]. They submitted that this influenced greatly patients' satisfaction with health care services. Dhyana and Venkatesh, opined that quality reflects patient satisfaction, while patient satisfaction depends on several factors like admission procedure, physical facilities, diagnostics services, the behaviour of staff, cleanliness, food, and procedural techniques [38]. These are further corroborated by findings of this study. Batbaatar, et al. found that providers' competence, interpersonal skills and facility characteristics (physical environment, type, and level of the facility) were positively associated with patients' satisfaction [39]. Adhikary, et al. found factors like convenient opening hours, asking provider questions about health problems, provision of better cleanliness and privacy settings were found to be significantly associated with patients' satisfaction [40].

Findings of this study showed that female patients that participated in the study are significantly more satisfied with health care services compared to the male counterpart (t = -3.32; p = 0.01). This corroborated submission of Eyasu et al., in an attempt to assess adult patients' satisfaction with inpatient nursing care and associated factors in an Ethiopian referral hospital, Northeast, Ethiopia [12]. They found out that female in their study were significantly more satisfied with care compared to their male counterpart. This is further corroborated by Alhusban and Abualrub, [41] and Zarzycka, et al. [42] in their separate submission. However, Ibraheem, et al. [43,44] posited that there is no gender influence on patient's satisfaction.

This study found out that there is a significant relationship between level of education and patient's satisfaction with health care services (f = 6.27; p = 0.01). This is because level of education patients/clients will influence their perception and expectation from healthcare services. This was corroborated by the submission of Zarzycka, et al. [42] that level of education significantly influences patient's level of satisfaction with health care services. However while in Zarzycka, et al. [42] study submitted that people having less education was found to have higher level of satisfaction with health care, in our study, opposite is the case. Participants with higher level of education were found to be more satisfied with health care services. Karaca & Durna, also reported that level of education is associated with patient's satisfaction with care, also in their study people with college or university education were found to be more satisfied with care [29].

The results also showed that there is a significant relationship between occupation and patient's satisfaction with health care services. Also, urban dwellers in the study were found to be three times more satisfied with health care services than their counterpart from the rural area. This is probably function of their level of exposure and education.

Conclusion

Most of the participants in this study were fully satisfied with healthcare services they received in the selected secondary hospitals. Most satisfied with aspect of their care were found to be availability nurses and accessibility of the hospitals. However, participants were not satisfied with the availability of the doctors, cost of care and admission procedure. It is therefore important that doctors should be more available to respond to the need to the patients. Also, nurses should not only be physically available in the hospitals, they should also be emotionally available to care for the emotional needs of the patients. Lastly, hospital administrators to review the admission procedures in the hospital to make it more patient friendly.

Authors Contributions

Oyebola Babatola and Rabiu Popoola conceptualize the study. Oyebola Babatola participated in data collection, study design writing-review and editing. RabiuPopoola supervised the study, review literature review, study design and editing. Matthew Olatubi participated in reviewing literature, designing the methodology, analysis of data and writing of the initial draft. Folasade Adewoyin participated in the review of literature, data cleaning and writing of the initial draft. All authors proof read and approved the manuscript.

Disclosure Statement

The authors did not receive any funding for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgement

The author appreciate the support they received from the post-graduate committee of School of Nursing, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria; Management and staff of the hospitals where this study was carried out and patients that consented and participated in the study.

References

  1. Maconko M, Kopanski Z, Strychar J, Malek L (2016) Satysfakcja pacjenta i metody jej pomiaru (Patient satisfaction and the methods of its assessment). J Clin Healthc 3: 14-19.
  2. Creanga AA, Gullo S, Kuhlmann AKS, Msiska TW, Galavotti C (2017) Is quality of care a key predictor of perinatal health care utilization and patient satisfaction in Malawi? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17: 150.
  3. Haskins JLM, Phakathi S, Grant M, Horwood CM (2014) Attitudes of nurses towards patient care at a rural district hospital in the Kwazulunatal Province of South Africa. Afr J Nurs Midwifery 16: 32-44.
  4. Osiya DA, Ogaji DS, Onotai L (2017) Patients' satisfaction with healthcare: comparing general practice services in a tertiary and primary healthcare settings. Niger Heal J 17.
  5. Will KK, Johnson ML, Lamb G (2019) Part of the Health and Medical Administration Commons, Health Services Administration Commons. Heal Serv Res Commons 6: 158-171.
  6. Musbah FA (2015) Nurse with cancer patient satisfaction. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
  7. Onyeonoro UU, Chukwu JN, Nwafor CC, Meka AO, Omotowo BI, et al. (2015) Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction with Tuberculosis Services in Southern Nigeria. Heal Serv Insights 8: 25-33.
  8. Khamis K, Njau B (2014) Patients ' level of satisfaction on quality of health care at Mwananyamala hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 14: 400.
  9. Goyal P, Kumar D, Dixit S, Srivastav S, Singh A (2016) Essential criteria for quality OPD services as perceived by patients in a tertiary care hospital in Faridabad City. Int J Res Med Sci 4: 441-445.
  10. Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, Asif M, Ali Shah SI (2019) Patient Satisfaction With Health Care Services; An Application of Physician's Behavior as a Moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 3318.
  11. Feysia B, Herbst CH, Lemma W, Soucat A (2015) The Health Workforce in Ethiopia: Addressing the Remaining Challenges. 2226 June. The World Bank 1-116.
  12. Eyasu KH, Adane AA, Amdie FZ, Getahun TB, Biwota MA (2016) Adult Patients' Satisfaction with Inpatient Nursing Care and Associated Factors in an Ethiopian Referral Hospital, Northeast, Ethiopia.
  13. Sharew NT, Bizuneh HT, Assefa HK, Habtewold TD (2018) Investigating admitted patients' satisfaction with nursing care at Debre Berhan Referral Hospital in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 8: e021107.
  14. Ibekwe M, Ndie EC, Ilo IC, Ezenduka PO, Musa KS (2019) Patients' perception of care provided to patients with prostate cancer in selected tertiary health institutions in south-east nigeria. 7: 129-134.
  15. Afe TO, Mojeed MB, Ogunsemi O (2019) Perception of service satisfaction and quality of life of patients living with schizophrenia in Lagos 216-222.
  16. Paul NI, Ugwu RO (2019) Caregivers/patients perception and satisfaction with outpatient HIV services at the university of port harcourt teaching hospital (UPTH), Port Harcourt, Nigeria 25: 1-9.
  17. Odetola TD, Fakorede EO (2018) Assessment of perinatal care satisfaction amongst mothers attending postnatal care in ibadan, nigeria. Ann Glob Health 84: 36-46.
  18. Onyeajam DJ, Xirasagar S, Khan MM, Hardin JW, Odutolu O (2018) Antenatal care satisfaction in a developing country: A cross-sectional study from Nigeria. BMC Public Health 18: 368.
  19. Akinyinka M, Oluwole E, Odusanya O (2019) Community medicine and primary health care community perception of quality of health care received and client satisfaction in lagos, nigeria. J Community Med Prim Heal Care 31: 47-65.
  20. Oluwole E, Mohammed A, Akinyinka M, Salako O (2017) Cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake among rural women in Lagos, Nigeria. J Community Med Prim Heal Care 29: 81-88.
  21. Abdullah S, Kousar R, Azhar M, Waqas A, Gilani S (2017) Nurses' and patients' perception regarding nurse caring behaviors and patients satisfaction in sir ganga ram hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Int Ann Med 1.
  22. Modebe AI, Azuike EC, Ucheagwa CM, Azuike ED, Obi DC, et al. (2014) Patient satisfaction on admission in Nnamdi Azikiwe university teaching hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. Patient Satisf Admiss Nnamdi Azikiwe 2: 596-600.
  23. Abernathy M (2015) Perceived Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Services and Interventions. J Heal Hum Serv Adm 31: 466-482.
  24. Ghafoor R, Hussain M, Afzal M, Sayed A, Gilani S (2018) Adult Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care, In Government Hospital Lahore Pakistan 4: 364-370.
  25. Shinde M, Kapurkar K (2014) Patient's satisfaction with nursing care provided in selected areas of tertiary care hospital. Int J Sci Res 3: 150-161.
  26. Ahmed T, Assefa N, Demisie A, Kenay A (2014) Levels of Adult Patients' Satisfaction with Nursing Care in Selected Public Hospitals in Ethiopia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 8: 371-379.
  27. Mussa MY, Mohammed AH, Ali IR (2016) Assessment of Adult Patients Satisfaction Regarding Nursing Care in Different Hospitals in Kirkuk City. Kirkuk Univ Journal-Scientific Stud 11: 222-236.
  28. Mulugeta H, Wagnew F, Dessie G, Biresaw H, Habtewold TD (2019) Patient satisfaction with nursing care in Ethiopia : a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs 18: 27.
  29. Karaca A, Durna Z (2019) Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open 6: 535-545.
  30. Tang WM, Soong C, Lim WC (2013) Patient satisfaction with nursing care: A descriptive study using interaction model of client health behavior. Int J Nurs Sci 3: 51-56.
  31. Sharma A, Kasar PK, Sharma R (2014) Patient satisfaction about hospital services: A study from the outpatient department of tertiary care hospital, jabalpur, madhya. Natl J Community Med 5: 199-203.
  32. Erci B, Çiftçioglu S (2010) Psychometric evaluation of the primary health-care satisfaction scale in Turkish women. Int J Qual Heal Care 22: 500-506.
  33. Villarruz-Sulit MV, Dans A, Javelosa MAU (2009) Measuring satisfaction with nursing care of patients admitted in the medical wards of the philippine general hospital.
  34. Milutinovic D, Simin D, Brkic N, Brkic S (2012) The patient satisfaction with nursing care quality: The psychometric study of the Serbian version of PSNCQ questionnaire. Scand J Caring Sci 26: 598-606.
  35. Omorogbe CE, Amiegheme FE (2016) Nurses' communication and patient satisfaction in a tertiary hospital in Benin City, Nigeria. 15: 47-56.
  36. Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J (2011) Determinants of patient satisfaction: A study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. Int J Qual Heal Care 23: 503-509.
  37. Schofield I, Tolson D, Arthur D, Davies S, Nolan M (2005) An exploration of the caring attributes and perceptions of work place change among gerontological nursing staff in England, Scotland and China (Hong Kong). Int J Nurs Stud 42: 197-209.
  38. Dhyana SR, Venkatesh R (2015) An empirical study of the factors influencing quality of healthcare and its effects on patient satisfaction. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 4: 54-59.
  39. Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Savino MM, Amenta P (2017) Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Perspect Public Health 137: 89-101.
  40. Adhikary G, Shawon SR, Ali W, Ahmed S, Shackelford KA, et al. (2018) Factors influencing patients' satisfaction at different levels of health facilities in Bangladesh: Results from patient exit interviews. PLoS One 13.
  41. Alhusban MA, Abualrub RF (2009) Patient satisfaction with nursing care in jordan. J Nurs Manag 17: 749-758.
  42. Zarzycka D, Barton E, Mazur A, Turowski K (2019) Socio-demographic and medical factors associated with patients ' satisfaction with nursing care and their perception of pain. Ann Agric Environ Med 26: 298-303.
  43. Ibraheem WA, Ibraheem AB, Bekibele CO (2013) Socio-demographic predictors of patients' satisfaction. 12: 87-90.
  44. Ibraheem OM, Oyewole OE, Olaseha IO (2015) Experiences and perceptions of menopause among women in Ibadan South East Local Government Area, Nigeria. African J Biomed Res 18: 81-94.

Citation

Babatola OH, Popoola RO, Olatubi MI, Adewoyin FR (2022) Patients' Satisfaction with Health Care Services in Selected Secondary Health Care Facilities in Ondo State, Nigeria. J Fam Med Dis Prev 8:145. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510145