ORIGINAL ARTICLE | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2 | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2474-3674/1510039

Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Recurrence and Surgical Management of Pneumothorax

Chihiro Nakano, Toru Yamagishi, Norio Kodaka, Kayo Watanabe, Kumiko Kishimoto, Takeshi Oshio, Kumiko Niitsuma, Nagashige Shimada and Hiroto Matsuse*

Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Japan

*Corresponding author: Hiroto Matsuse, MD, PhD, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-22-36 Ohashi Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan, Tel: +81-3-3468-1251, Fax: +81-3-3468-5082.

Accepted: July 28, 2018 | Published: July 30, 2018

Citation: Nakano C, Yamagishi T, Kodaka N, Watanabe K, Kishimoto K, et al. (2018) Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Recurrence and Surgical Management of Pneumothorax. Int J Crit Care Emerg Med 4:039. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510039

Copyright: © 2018 Nakano C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract


Background

The clinical characteristics and management strategies for pneumothorax are highly variable.

Objectives

The purpose of the present study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and to determine the risk factors for recurrence and the surgical management of pneumothorax.

Methods

The clinical characteristics, as well as the risk factors for recurrence and surgical treatment, were retrospectively analyzed in 125 patients with pneumothorax that was managed in our hospital.

Results

The incidence of pneumothorax was higher in men and current or former smokers. Patients with secondary pneumothorax were significantly older and required more frequent chest drainage than those with primary pneumothorax. Collapse rate was an independent predictor of the need for chest drainage. Chest drainage, recurrence, and the presence of bulla ≥ 2 cm were the independent predictors of the need for surgical treatment.

Conclusions

Patients with secondary pneumothorax and higher collapse rate frequently required chest drainage. Surgical treatment should be considered in patients who require chest drainage, those with recurrent episodes, or those with bulla ≥ 2 cm.

Keywords


Pneumothorax, Bullous disease, Chest tube drainage

Introduction


Most cases of pneumothorax comprise primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), which usually occurs in young, tall men and results from rupture of subpleural blebs or bullae [1]. Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), on the other hand, is associated with an underlying lung disease, such as emphysema or asthma; acute or chronic infections; lung cancer; and congenital disease, including cystic fibrosis, catamenial pneumothorax, and lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Patients with small pneumothorax are managed by bed rest, oxygen supplementation, or manual aspiration [2-4]; whereas patients with larger or recurrent episodes of pneumothorax may require more aggressive therapies, such as chest tube drainage or surgery [5-9]. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and to determine the risk factors for recurrence and the surgical management of pneumothorax.

Materials and Methods


Patients

The medical records of 140 patients who were treated for pneumothorax at our hospital from April 2013 to September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Figure 1 shows the study design and exclusion criteria. The study protocol was approved (No.15-96) by the Ohashi Hospital Committee of Toho University Ohashi Medical Center.

Figure 1: Study design and exclusion criteria.
PSP: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax; SSP: Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax; CT: Computed tomography. View Figure 1

Parameters

PSP was defined based on medical history, chest radiography, or computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively collected the following variables: detailed history, number of pneumothorax episodes and treatment modalities, age, sex, smoking habits, laterality, collapse rate, need for hospitalization, and treatment period. Since manual needle aspiration was performed on only five symptomatic patients with small pneumothorax, we compared patients based on the presence or absence of chest drainage. The patients who underwent chest tube drainage were further compared based on the application of continuous negative pressure suction. The surgical management for all patients was wedge resection.

The pneumothorax collapse rate was calculated as a percentage, based on the method defined by Kircher (Figure 2), at the time of diagnosis of pneumothorax. Using the posteroanterior chest radiograph, the atelectatic lung area was subtracted from the area of the entire hemithorax; the result was then divided by the area of the entire hemithorax.

Figure 2: Chest radiograph showing the calculation of the percentage of pneumothorax based on the method defined by Kircher.
Collapse rate = (1-ab/AB) × 100. View Figure 2

At the time of lung expansion, chest CT was performed on 125 patients who were divided and compared according to the presence or absence of bleb or bullae. Patients with bleb or bullae were further subdivided and compared based on the number (single vs. multiple) and size (≥ 2 cm vs. < 2 cm) of the bleb or bullae.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were assessed by the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Variables with a P value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic regression to determine the predictors of the need for chest drainage and surgical treatment. All analyses were performed by SPSS Statistics (IBM; Tokyo, Japan). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results


Analysis of clinical characteristics

Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the 125 patients. The incidence of pneumothorax was higher in men and current or former smokers. Approximately 74% required hospital admission. Comparison of the clinical findings based on treatment is shown in Table 2. Patients without chest drainage and those with chest drainage had significant differences in smoking habits, collapse rate, laterality, and surgical treatment but were comparable in terms of recurrence rate and treatment period. Among the patients with chest drainage, addition of continuous negative pressure suction significantly affected the duration of treatment and the need for surgical treatment.

Table 1: Characteristics of the study population. View Table 1

Table 2: Comparison of the clinical findings by treatment (n = 125). View Table 2

Table 3 shows the comparison of clinical findings based on the cause of pneumothorax. Patients with SSP were significantly older and required chest drainage more frequently than those with PSP. Majority of the cases were PSP; the underlying causes of SSP were emphysema (n = 7), cystic fibrosis (n = 4), pneumonitis (n = 10), and lung cancer (n = 1).

Table 3: Comparison of the clinical findings according to the cause of pneumothorax (n = 125). View Table 3

Predictors of the need for chest drainage and surgical treatment

A comparison of the clinical findings based on the presence and number of blebs and/or bullae is shown in Table 4. Both groups had significant differences in terms of recurrence, collapse rate, and requirement for chest drainage and surgical treatment. Recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with multiple bullae than in those with single bulla. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictor for the need for chest drainage was collapse rate [odds ratio (OR) 1.1516, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.0855-1.2184; p < 0.001] (Table 5); the independent predictors for the need for surgical treatment were chest drainage (OR 3.4685, 95% CI 1.3299-9.0463; p = 0.0110), recurrence (OR 3.6552, 95% CI 1.0756-12.4211; p = 0.0378); and presence of bulla ≥ 2 cm (OR 0.2601, 95% CI 0.0856-0.7910; p = 0.0176) (Table 6).

Table 4: Comparison of the clinical findings based on the presence of cystic lesion (n = 125). View Table 4

Table 5: Multivariate analysis of the predictors of chest drainage (n = 125). View Table 5

Table 6: Multivariate analysis of the predictors of surgical treatment (n = 125). View Table 6

Discussion


In this study, PSP was the most common cause of pneumothorax and occurred more frequently in young men with smoking habits, as previously reported. Many factors are involved in the pathogenesis of PSP. The rate of recurrence after the first episode of PSP was reported to be higher in smokers than in non-smokers [5,10-12]. The pathogenesis of PSP is believed to differ between smokers and non-smokers. Cheng Y reported that pathologic findings of respiratory bronchiolitis were seen in all smoking patients and in only 49% of non-smokers [13]. Bronchial abnormalities and distal airway inflammation or obstruction in smokers could lead to rupture of the visceral pleura and passage of air into the pleural space [5,10]. In this study, the recurrence rate of pneumothorax was higher in smokers than in non-smokers.

Comparison of the clinical findings based on the management of PSP patients demonstrated a significantly more frequent need for surgical treatment in patients who underwent chest tube drainage than in those without chest drainage. For PSP patients without chest drainage, surgical treatment was performed to prevent recurrence. Since almost all SSP patients were treated with chest tube drainage, we suggest that SSP cases undergo chest drainage with continuous aspiration and surgical treatment at an earlier stage after the diagnosis.

Although the pathophysiology of PSP recurrence in never-smokers remains unclear, the presence of bleb or bullae in about 81% of such cases was reported to be associated with PSP recurrence [14,15]. Kinoshita, et al. reported that recurrence rate was 40.7% in patients with bleb or bullae and only 11.1% in patients without bleb or bullae [16]. In this study, recurrence rate was also significantly higher in patients with multiple blebs or bullae than in those with single bleb or bulla.

In this study, the need for surgical treatment was significantly frequent for patients with PSP with bleb or bullae, SSP, treatment with chest tube drainage, and application of continuous negative pressure suction. However, the number of blebs or bullae was not a predictor of PSP prognosis. In patients with PSP, collapse rate was significantly associated with the need for chest tube drainage, whereas recurrence, presence of bleb or bullae ≥ 2 cm, and requirement for chest drainage might be the clinically useful predictors of the need for surgical treatment.

The present study had several limitations, including its retrospective design and inclusion of recurrent cases. Therefore, we could not evaluate recurrence accurately. Another limitation was the small population of SSP. In order to validate our findings and identify the predictors of recurrence and need for surgical treatment of pneumothorax, we are planning to perform a prospective study on patients with initial pneumothorax episode and to increase the number of subjects.

In conclusion, patients with SSP and higher collapse rate frequently required chest drainage. Surgical treatment should be considered for patients requiring chest drainage, those with recurrent episodes, and those with bullae > 2 cm.

References


  1. Lippert HL, Lund O, Blegvad S, Larsen HV (1991) Independent risk factors for cumulative recurrence rate after first spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 4: 324-331.

  2. Light RW (1993) Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Am Rev Respir Dis 148: 245-248.

  3. van de Brekel JA, Duurkens VA, Vanderschueren RG (1993) Pneumothorax results of thoracoscopy and pleurodesis with talc poudrage and thoracotomy. Chest 103: 345-347.

  4. Boutin C, Astoul P, Rey F, Mathur PN (1995) Thoracoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Clin Chest Med 16: 497-503.

  5. Schramel FM, Postmus PE, Vanderschueren RG (1997) Current aspects of spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 10: 1372-1379.

  6. Baumann MH, Strange C (1997) Treatment of spontaneous Pneumothorax. Chest 122: 789-804.

  7. Sahn SA, Heffner JE (2000) Spontaneous Pneumothorax. N Engl J Med 342: 868-874.

  8. Noppen M, Baumann MH (2003) Pathogenesis and treatment of primary spontaneous Pneumothorax: An overview. Respiration 70: 431-438.

  9. Noppen M, De Keukeleire T (2008) Pneumothorax. Respiration 76: 121-127.

  10. Sadikot RT, T Greene, K Meadows, AG Arnold (1997) Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax 52: 805-809.

  11. Bense L, Eklund G, Wiman LG (1987) Smoking and the increased risk of contracting spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest 92: 1009-1012.

  12. Hunninghake GW, Crystal RG (1983) Cigarette smoking and lung destraction: Accumulation of neutrophilis in the lungs of cigarette smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 128: 833-838.

  13. Cheng YL, Huang TW, Lin CK, Lee SC, Tzao C, et al. (2009) The impact of smoking in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac cardiovasc Surg 138: 192-195.

  14. Gobel WG (1957) Spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 34: 1767-1769.

  15. Bense L, Lewander R, Eklund G, Hedenstierna G, Wiman LG (1993) Nonsmoking, non-alpha1-antitrypsis deficiency-induced emphysema in nonsmokers with healed spontaneous pneumothorax, identified by computed tomography of the lungs. Chest 103: 433-438.

  16. Kinoshita T, Maebeya S, Sakurai T (2003) Treatment and evaluation primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Jpn Surg Assoc 64: 1-4.