Citation

Candik P, Kolesar A, Nosal M, Paulíny M, Sabol F, et al. (2019) Use of Programmed Multilevel Ventilation as a Superior Method for Lung Recruitment in Heart Surgery. Int J Crit Care Emerg Med 5:067. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510067

Copyright

© 2019 Candik P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE | OPEN ACCESSDOI: 10.23937/2474-3674/1510067

Use of Programmed Multilevel Ventilation as a Superior Method for Lung Recruitment in Heart Surgery

Peter Candik1, Adrian Kolesar2*, Martin Nosal1, Matúš Paulíny3, Frantisek Sabol2, Viera Donicova4, Viliam Donic5 and Pavol Torok1

1Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, East Slovakian Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Faculty of Medicine, Safarik University, Slovakia

2Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, East Slovakian Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Faculty of Medicine, Safarik University, Slovakia

3Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, Slovak Health University, Slovakia

4Department of Pathophysiology, Safarik University, Slovakia

5Department of Human Physiology, Safarik University, Slovakia

Abstract

Objectives

During cardiac surgery, extracorporeal circulation (ECC) causes lung injury. In these inhomogenously affected lungs, the pressure control ventilation (PCV) cannot adequately ventilate differently damaged lung compartments. We invented and used original multilevel lung ventilation method named 3-LV based on alternating 3 or more pressure levels, ventilation frequencies and delivered tidal volumes. The goal of this article is to compare lung mechanics in cardiac surgery patient after ECC using standard PCV when compared to 3LV ventilation.

Methods

This study was performed on 88 cardiac surgery patients after disconnection from ECC; the patients were randomly (allocation by weekdays) divided into two groups and ventilated by PCV and 3LV. Group 1 (n = 44) started with 1 hour PCV followed by a second hour with the 3-LV mode. Group 2 (n = 44) was ventilated in the reverse order. Measured parameters were statistically evaluated by the Student's paired t-test.

Results

The static compliance (Cst) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in 3-LV ventilation mode improved by 25-32% (p < 0.01) and 31% (p < 0.01), in group actually ventilated by 3LV ventilation. The respiratory rate after weaning in Group 1 significantly decreased compared with that in Group 2 (p < 0.05). An improved CO2 washout was observed in each group after switching to 3LV.

Conclusions

3-LV showed a better lung recruitment ability compared with PCV in patients after cardiac surgery, without using high PEEP level.