Citation

Alyousef S, Khafajeh R, Alharbi A, Alayed A, Alnojaidi NF, et al. (2022) An Evaluation of Pediatric Airway Management Training for Suspected/Confirmed COVID-19 Patients Utilizing Medical Simulation at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Crit Care Emerg Med 8:148. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510148

Brief Report | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2474-3674/1510148

An Evaluation of Pediatric Airway Management Training for Suspected/Confirmed COVID-19 Patients Utilizing Medical Simulation at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Sawsan Alyousef, MD, CAPB, FCCP1,2,3,4, Raed Khafajeh5, Ali Alharbi6, Aseel Alayed7, Najd Fawaz Alnojaidi8 and Abdulaziz Alsoqati9

1Senior Pediatric Intensive Care & Pulmonary Consultant, Assistant Professor, King Saud University for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia

2Chairperson of PICU Fellowship Examination at SCFHS, Saudi Arabia

3Chairperson of Simulation Research, CRESENT, Saudi Arabia

4Critical Care Center, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia

5Master of Education, Nurse Educator, Pediatric Intensive Care Department, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia

6Pediatric Intensive Care Consultant, Critical Care Center, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia

7Simulation Specialist, Center for Research, Education and Simulation Enhanced Training, CRESENT, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia

8Graduate of Al-Maarefa Medical University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

9Pediatric Intensive Care Consultant, Director of Pediatric Intensive Care Department, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Introduction: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be transmitted to clinicians involved in their care, particularly during aerosol-generating procedures. In spite centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) had put clear standards for precaution when dealing with such patients but unfortunately several health care providers had lost their lives around the world.

Objectives: To evaluate virtual/in-person medical simulation training about airway management of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pediatric patients on pediatric health care provider in KFMC.

Methods: Cross-section study done on pediatric health care providers at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia through google form questioner. Inclusion criteria: Health care providers involved in pediatric airway management for confirmed/suspected Covid-19 patients at KFMC, whether they attended virtual/in-person simulation training courses or didn't attend. We decided in this study to transmit the guideline on airway management for confirmed/suspected Covid-19 pediatric patients into simulation training courses to be run into in-situ simulation for multidisciplinary team, then when in situ area was converted into covid-19 care area we video tape this course and add it as QR barcode to the guideline.

Results: 70% of the responders had attended virtual/in-person simulation training, majorities were able to follow the guideline steps during airway management of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pediatric patients. 85% of responders indicate that, simulation training either hands-on or video demonstration had helped them in Airway management for confirmed/suspected COVID-19.

Discussion: Most of the studies share the importance of generating guideline for pediatric airway management of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pediatric patients. Adding simulation training as QR code to the guideline make it readily and easily accessed by healthcare providers and are crucial for involved health care providers for safe and best care.

Keywords

Guideline, Simulation, COVID-19, Healthcare, QR barcode

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be transmitted to clinicians involved in their care, particularly during aerosol-generating procedures such as, Positive pressure ventilation (PPV), endotracheal intubation and extubation [1]. In spite centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) had put clear standards for precaution when dealing with such patients but unfortunately several health care providers had lost their lives around the world [2]. For these reasons several countries had mobilized towards proper training and establishing guidelines to protect both patients and healthcare providers in preparing for the airway management of the COVID-19 patient group. The principles for airway management should be the same for all patients with COVID-19 (asymptomatic, mild or critically unwell). Safe, simple, familiar, reliable and robust practices should be adopted for all episodes of airway management for patients with COVID-19 [1]. Centers around the world had used different modalities to train health care providers on management of Covid-19 airway. Simulation bloomed during the epidemic due to its flexibility and capacity to train large number of health-care professionals at different levels in a timely manner either individually or in multidisciplinary teams through experiential learning. But simulation-based activities were limited due to multiple factors. Such as, infection control and social distancing measures, converting simulation centers into Covid-19 care area, financial and manpower limitations are other factors, attendance was suboptimal due to participants' fear of contracting the infection during the sessions, the shortage of available personal protective equipment. The busy schedule of both the trainers and trainees plus budget constraints and the limited availability of simulation technologists and support staff further exacerbated the aforementioned hindrances [3]. So we decided in this study to transmit the guideline on airway management for confirmed/suspected Covid-19 pediatric patients, which was created in our institute KFMC into simulation training courses to be run into in-situ simulation for multidisciplinary team, then when in situ area was converted into Covid-19 care area we agreed to video tape this course and add it as QR barcode to the guideline to be readily and easily accessed by any healthcare provider in the King Fahad Medical City (KFMC) institute.

Objectives

To Evaluate virtual/in-person medical simulation training about airway management of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pediatric patients on pediatric health care provider in KFMC.

Methods

Cross-section study done on pediatric health care providers at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia through google form questioner. Inclusion criteria: Health care providers involved in pediatric airway management for confirmed/suspected covid 19 patients at KFMC, whether they attended virtual/in-person simulation training courses or didn't attend. So we decided in this study to transmit the guideline on airway management for confirmed/ suspected Covid-19 pediatric patients, which was created in our institute KFMC into simulation training courses to be run into in-situ simulation for multidisciplinary team, then when in situ area was converted into Covid-19 care area we video tape this course and add it as QR barcode to the guideline to be readily and easily accessed by any healthcare provider in the KFMC institute.

The questioners were sent electronically to all pediatric health care providers at KFMC whom fulfill inclusion criteria. It indicates if the simulation courses had helped the health care provider on proper personal protection equipment (PPE) during donning, doffing and on prevention of aerosol transmission Covid-19 infection during detailed steps of airway management as pre-oxygenation, intubation and extubation (Appendix A).

Statistical Analysis

All categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. The comparison of the practice of pediatric airway management training for suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patients utilizing medical simulation between physicians and nurses had been conducted using Fischer Exact test. A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, USA).

Results

This cross-sectional study evaluates healthcare providers' (HCPs) pediatric airway management training for suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patients utilizing medical simulation. As described in Table 1, nearly 70% of HCPs attended hands-on simulation training on airway management for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients. Of them, 61% had attended once. The prevalence of HCPs who attended video demonstrations on airway management for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 was 81.4%. Of them, 65.2% attended at least once. The proportion of HCPs who were involved in airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients was 59.3%. Of those who were involved, 34.3% provided IV medications.

Table 1: Assessment of Pediatric Airway Management Training for suspected/Confirmed COVID 19 patients utilizing Medical Simulation (n = 59). View Table 1

Table 2a and Table 2b presented the HCPs practice for those who were involved in airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients. Based on the results, 3 HCPs were not able to wear PPE completely with unavailability of PPE reported by 2 HCPs. Also, approximately 14.3% were partially or were not able to learn (5.7%) the precautions during intubation and the most common obstacle was the unavailability of a nylon cover (85.7%). The most common BVM ventilation method was the VE maneuver (65.7%). A high proportion of HCPs (80%) reported that the timing of inflation of the ETT cuff was done properly. Confirmation of intubation was done by both visualization and End-PCO2 (65.7%). Proper discarding of soiled equipment was reported by 85.7% and proper doffing was reported by 97.1%. During extubation, proper wearing of PPE according to the role was reported by 82.9%. Nearly all HCPs (91.4%) used protective sheets and most of them (88.6%) were carefully done the sequence of proper extubation precautions. Of those who were not able to achieve proper extubation precautions (n = 4), 2 of them stated that the nylon covers were unavailable at that time and the other 2 said, PPE was not available. Approximately 88.6% of HCPs indicated that the time required for donning and doffing is longer in COVID-19 cases than in other cases. Similarly, 80% and 51.4% of HCPs reported that the procedure for intubation and extubation for confirmed/suspected COVID-19 patients is more difficult than the other patients. The proportion of HCPs who reported that the simulation training either hands-on or video demonstration had helped them in airway management for COVID-19 cases was 85.7%. In addition, 82.9% indicated that they reviewed the guidelines for airway management related to COVID-19 patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Distribution of the position of the sample population. View Figure 1

Table 2a: Healthcare provider practice on airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients (n = 35). View Table 2a

Table 2b: Healthcare provider practice on airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients (cont'd.) (n = 35). View Table 2b

In Table 3, the prevalence of those who attended hands-on simulation training for airway management (p = 0.041) and those who attended a video demonstration (p = 0.004) was significantly more among physicians while there were no significant differences in their involvement in airway management in actual confirmed/suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients between physicians and nurses (p = 0.412).

Table 3: Assessment of Pediatric Airway Management Training for suspected/Confirmed COVID 19 patients utilizing Medical Simulation between physicians and nurses (n = 59). View Table 3

In Table 4, the use of the VE maneuver as a method of BVM ventilation (p = 0.034), and the use of video laryngoscope (p = 0.012) were significantly more among physicians while the use of both visualization and end-PCO2 to confirm intubation was significantly more among nurses (p < 0.001). Other related practices on airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients were not significantly different between physicians and nurses including following the learned precautions during the intubation period (p = 0.680), clamping of ETT before inflating the cuff (p = 0.193), proper timing of inflation of ETT cuff (p = 0.831), the procedure of extubation for COVID-19 patients (p = 0.435) and review of institute guideline for airway management (p = 0.207).

Table 4: Practice on airway management on real confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pediatric patients between physicians and nurses (n = 35). View Table 4

Discussion

Most of the studies share the importance of generating guideline on pediatric airway management. For many years, WHO has been working with countries to prepare for a global pandemic and has published guidance to help all countries prepare and brace for future outbreaks. For countries where resources are scarce or where there's risk of overwhelming a fragile health system, WHO has published guidance on COVID-19 preparedness and response in low capacity and humanitarian settings [4,5]. The Pediatric Difficult Intubation Collaborative (PeDI-C), which includes 35 hospitals from 6 countries, generated guidelines on airway management in pediatric anesthesia based on expert opinion, they identified certain goals including minimizing aerosolized respiratory secretions and number of clinicians in contact with a patient, use of in-line suction catheters, using appropriate personal protective equipment when performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in asymptomatic children, Airway procedures should be done in negative pressure rooms when available [6]. Airway management of patients with Covid-19 is a high-risk procedure, COVID-19 airway should be considered as potentially difficult and complicated. Triaging, personal protective equipment and isolation areas may cause challenges [7]. Beside The importance of creating an airway management team and the closed loop communication for managing COVID-19 airway [8]. Cook TM, et al. recommended to develop principles for airway management of patients with COVID-19 to encourage safe, accurate and swift performance [8]. In the Italian group's study, the use of checklist was put forward as it becomes extremely important for effective planning before tracheal intubation of Covid-19 patients [9]. Cheung JC, et al., recommend that endotracheal intubation is done by an expert specialized person and as early as needed. And if manual bagging is required, they suggested gentle ventilation via a supraglottic device instead of bag mask ventilation and to utilize a continuous waveform capnography monitoring device as it reflects correct endotracheal tube placement. Also they recommend Rapid sequence induction technique preferably rocuronium over suxamethonium for its longer half-life, which effectively prevents coughing or vomiting. ETT cuff should be inflated immediately to avoid leakage. The endotracheal tube should be connected to the ventilator via a filter [10]. Brewster DJ, et al. also recommended the use of a second-generation supraglottic airway device as its higher seal pressure during positive pressure ventilation decreases the risk of aerosolization of virus-containing fluid particles [1]. Video laryngoscopy can be used as an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for training and assessment in tracheal intubation in clinical settings and believe that all patients with COVID-19, and ideally every patient during the pandemic, should be intubated using video laryngoscopy [6,8,9,11,12]. During this pandemic, we encourage colleagues to prepare for difficulties during tracheal intubation and extubation as several reported cases of covid-19 association with airway edema, so especially emphasized that more care should be taken after documented difficult airway management or prolonged tracheal intubation. Advanced techniques in extubation include tube exchange catheters, Bailey maneuver and staged extubation set [13-15].

Several studies recommend to reduce the use of noninvasive ventilation and high flow oxygenation to reduce aerosolization [9]. Cheung JC, et al. documented that High Flow Nasal Cannula is recognized by World Health Organization for the treatment of patients with respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. However, the use of airborne isolation was recommended because the system can theoretically increase the risk of viral spread through aerosol generation [10]. Other studies concentrated on personal protected equipment PPE during caring for COVID-19 patients, Careful planning developing processes to ensure that PPE is readily available, simulations and training of staff are crucial to ensure the safety of patients and healthcare workers, they recommended that hospitals must modify their airway management and PPE guidelines based on feedback from clinicians on the ground and improved understanding of the transmissibility of the virus [16].

The question is what is the best way to deliver these guidelines to health care providers?

Pre-pandemic, simulation training courses on pediatric airway showed its efficacy. S Alyousef, et al. demonstrated that, the pediatric airway management simulation course at CRESENT, KFMC is effective in improving the knowledge and practical skills of pediatric residents. Although the greatest improvement is noted among junior residents, learners from different residency levels have comparable knowledge and practical skills at the end of the course [17].

Comparing pre-pandemic difficult airway guidelines with the recent COVID-19 guidelines, and then valuing, and understanding of these differences and modifications had led to greater adherence to the new COVID-19 guidelines mainly related to minimizing aerosol contamination and protecting healthcare workers [18]. Our study share similar outcome with Di Pan, et al. which stated, healthcare simulation training for Covid-19 patients, not only helped carry our institution through the peak of patient surge during the pandemic, but left us with lasting improvements in the function of our organization and crisis resource management [19]. Via Abatzis, et al. healthcare simulation training has many opportunities for reinforcement and refinement of the critical skills, mainly gaining feedback that led to protocol refinement. We were able to decrease unnecessary risk from learning "on-the-fly", in a clinical setting that has demonstrated high-risk for nosocomial transmission. This is helping to keep team members healthy and ready to care for our sickest, and most vulnerable patients [20]. So for these reasons we decided to transmit the guideline on airway management for confirmed/suspected Covid-19 pediatric patients, which was created in our institute KFMC into simulation training courses to be run into in-situ simulation for multidisciplinary team, then when in situ area was converted into Covid-19 care area we agreed to video tape this course and add it as QR barcode to the guideline to be readily and easily accessed by any healthcare provider in the KFMC institute. 85% of responders indicate that, simulation training either hands-on or video demonstration had helped them in Airway management for confirmed/suspected COVID-19 while 14% indicate it partially helped.

Conclusion

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 can be transmitted to clinicians involved in their care, particularly during aerosol-generating procedures such as, Positive pressure ventilation, endotracheal intubation and extubation. Several precautions should be taken during the care to these patients, one of the best way is either in person simulation training or videotape these courses and adding it as QR barcode to the guideline of Pediatric airway management for confirmed/ suspected Covid-19, make it readily and easily accessed by healthcare providers and are crucial for involved health care providers for safe and best care.

Recommendation

We recommend to apply virtual or in person simulation training to clinical medical guideline and add it as QR barcode to the guideline.

Authors Declaration

All the authors confirm that there are no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Brewster DJ, Chrimes NC, Do TB, Fraser K, Christopher JG, et al. (2020) Consensus statement: Safe airway society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med J Aust 212: 472-481.
  2. CDC: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.
  3. Aldekhyl SS, Arabi YM (2020) Simulation role in preparing for COVID-19. Ann Thorac Med 15: 134-137.
  4. World Health Organization (2020) Director-General's remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020.
  5. World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) technical guidance.
  6. Matava CT, Kovatsis PG, Lee JK, Castro P, Denning S, et al. (2020) Pediatric airway management in COVID-19 patients: Consensus guidelines from the society for pediatric anesthesia's pediatric difficult intubation collaborative and the canadian pediatric anesthesia society. Anesth Analg 131: 61-73.
  7. Saracoglu KT, Saracoglu A, Demirhan R (2020) Airway management strategies for the Covid 19 patients: A brief narrative review. J Clin Anesth 66: 109954.
  8. Cook TM, El-Boghdadly K, McGuire B, McNarry AF, Patel A, et al. (2020) Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the difficult airway society, the association of anaesthetists the intensive care society, the faculty of intensive care medicine and the royal college of anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 75: 785-799.
  9. Simsek T, Yilmaz M, Saracoglu A, Saracoglu KT (2020) Preoperative airway management checklist: The transfer of knowledge into clinical practice by video-based feedback. South Clin Ist Euras 31: 26-30.
  10. Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EYK, Lam KN (2020) Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med 8: e19.
  11. De Jong A, Pardo E, Rolle A, Bodin-Lario S, Pouzeratte Y, et al. (2020) Airway management for COVID-19: A move towards universal videolaryngoscope? Lancet Respir Med 8: 555.
  12. Gómez-Ríos MA, Casans-Francés R, Abad-Gurumeta A, Esquinas A (2020) The role of videolaryngoscopy in airway management of COVID-19 patients. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 52: 344-345.
  13. McGrath BA, Wallace S, Goswamy J (2020) Laryngeal oedema associated with COVID-19 complicating airway management. Anaesthesia 75: 972.
  14. Sorbello M, El-Boghdadly K, Di Giacinto I, Cataldo R, Esposito C, et al. (2020) The Italian coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: Recommendations from clinical practice. Anaesthesia 75: 724-732.
  15. Saracoglu KT, Yilmaz M, Duzyol IY, Turan AZ, Okuyucu KA, et al. (2018) Advanced techniques in extubation: Bailey maneuver, tube exchange catheter and staged extubation set. J Clin Anesth 48: 28-29.
  16. Miller L, Luković E, Wagener G (2020) Guiding airway management and personal protective equipment for COVID-19 intubation teams. Br J Anaesth 125: e288-e290.
  17. Alyousef S, Marwa H, Alnojaidi N, Lababidi H, Bashir MS (2017) Cumulative evaluation data: Pediatric airway management simulation courses for pediatric residents, Advance Simulation 2: 11.
  18. Wong P, Lim WY (2020) Aligning difficult airway guidelines with the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines to develop a COVID-19 difficult airway strategy: A narrative review. J Anesth 34: 924-943.
  19. Di Pan, Rajwani K (2021) Implementation of simulation training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Simul Healthc 16: 46-51.
  20. Abatzis V, Hilton-Bucholz E, Plunkett H, Mckenna C, Friedman J, et al. (2020) COVID-19 PPE and airway management simulation training, clinical teaching and learning eXPERIENCES. AAMC.

Citation

Alyousef S, Khafajeh R, Alharbi A, Alayed A, Alnojaidi NF, et al. (2022) An Evaluation of Pediatric Airway Management Training for Suspected/Confirmed COVID-19 Patients Utilizing Medical Simulation at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Crit Care Emerg Med 8:148. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510148