ORIGINAL ARTICLE | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1 | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5769/1510030

The Different Approaches of Single Lung Ventilation in Infants with Pulmonary Malformation

Costanza Tognon1, Luisa Meneghini1, Francesco Fascetti Leon2 and Piergiorgio Gamba2

1Anesthesiology Pediatric Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Padova, Italy

2Pediatric Surgery, University of Padova, Italy

*Corresponding author: Costanza Tognon, Anesthesiology Pediatric Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Padova, Italy, E-mail: costanza.tognon@aopd.veneto.it

Published: February 17, 2018

Citation: Tognon C, Meneghini L, Leon FF, Gamba P (2018) The Different Approaches of Single Lung Ventilation in Infants with Pulmonary Malformation. Int J Pediatr Res 4:030. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5769/1510030

Copyright: © 2018 Tognon C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Since many years, feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic surgery in infants with pulmonary malformations has been confirmed. Nevertheless, infants present some problems caused by the anatomical and physiological peculiarities typical of the age and of the size of the structures. Several ways to overcome these difficulties have been proposed to assure efficacy and safety of mono pulmonary ventilation. The knowledge of the infant's respiratory physiology is essential to prevent complications and eventually to treat them. In the same way the technical skill with all the available tools is mandatory for the airway management.


One-lung ventilation, Pulmonary malformation, Video assisted thoracoscopy, Infant


Surgical treatment of infants with congenital lung malformations in the first months of their life is highly recommended because of their tendency towards recurrent respiratory infections and malignancy. Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has for many years been the surgical option of choice because it offers better results than open thoracotomy: Shoulder girdle weakness, chest wall deformity, and scoliosis are often the long-term results of thoracotomy in small children, even with the muscle-sparing surgical technique. On the other hand, benefits of thoracoscopy are well known: The minimal invasiveness implies decreased length of stay, faster recovery, better cosmetic results, significant reduction of postoperative pain [1,2]. This surgical choice led anesthesiologists to change their usual anesthetic technique: Indeed, a thoracotomy does not always require lung isolation and collapse in infants [3].

Although one-lung ventilation (OLV) is not mandatory in thoracic endoscopic surgery [4,5], it is important for the success of the procedure, because it provides an optimal exposure of the surgical field; many authors found that a non-optimal exposure of the surgical field is a frequent cause of conversion to open surgery [4-7]. Moreover, it assures the protection from contamination of the healthy, dependent lung. OLV is more difficult in infants than in older children because of anatomical and physiological aspects typical of small children. Our aim is to explain the peculiar problems arising in these patients.

Anatomical Peculiarities of the Airway of Small Children

The small diameter of the infant's airway explains many of the problems that might occur during OLV: The narrow superior airway is the principal factor in the choice of the tracheal intubation technique; from this choice depends the quality of lung exclusion and the potential duration and success of thoracic endoscopic surgery. The tracheal and bronchial mucosa might suffer damage during intubation because of the decubitus of the blocker balloon [1]. A displacement of the tracheal tube or of the blocker can occur during the change of the decubitus position or during surgery, because the infant's airway is very short. The peripheral airway might close in the dependent lung, because the functional residual capacity is closer to the residual volume and atelectasis ensues. A small lumen is easily obstructed by blood or secretions. Every manipulation of the tracheal tube, airway, and bronchial blocker has to be made very carefully.

The technical skills required for the management of OLV in infants are of great relevance and anesthetic management has a big impact on the successful performance of VATS [1,8].

Physiology of OLV and of Lateral Position in Infants

In adults and children in normal conditions the respiratory exchanges are optimal if ventilation (V) and perfusion (Q) are well matched. During OLV the ratio V/Q is increased, that is the intrapulmonary shunt is increased, with detrimental effects on oxygen exchanges. This effect is due to several factors: Diaphragmatic pushing, lung compression by mediastinal structures, by abdominal viscera, and by rolls under the thorax to obtain the right patient's position. Moreover, the decrease of residual functional capacity and of tidal volume, general anesthesia, surgical manoeuvers and mechanical ventilation are other factors promoting V/Q mismatch. There is a physiological mechanism which can decrease this negative effect, the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV); the pulmonary vasoconstriction shifts the blood circulation away from lung areas where the ventilation is poor or absent to the well ventilated lung. When the lung is collapsed, a large share of the blood is diverted toward the dependent lung, but a small share remains in the non-ventilated lung and is not oxygenated. While these events occur in adults and children, the lateral decubitus position has negative effects on V/Q mismatch only in children. The adult in the lateral decubitus position does not experience serious difficulties because their rib cage is rigid, the hydrostatic pressure gradient between the lungs and the gravity pressure are higher than in small children; the diversion of the blood circulation from the diseased lung to the healthy, dependent lung is more difficult in children than in adults. Children have a soft rib cage and lungs: The dependent hemithorax is compressed by the lateral decubitus position and by the rolls placed to allow a better exposure of the surgical field, the lung compliance of the dependent, healthy, ventilated lung decreases and hypoxia ensues [9-11]. These events make small children prone to hypoxia; for this reason it is essential to maintain the possibility of ventilating both lungs during the whole procedure.

Techniques for OLV

The decreased airway size in infants excludes the choices of double-lumen endobronchial tubes and Univent tubes, which are too large for small children. Only two options are possible, namely selective main stem intubation and endobronchial blocker [1,5-7,12,13].

Selective Mainstream Intubation

The selective bronchial intubation with a single-lumen tracheal tube is the simplest and least expensive way to achieve OLV in infants. The tube must be a half size smaller than that one suitable for tracheal intubation. The right bronchial insertion is very easy and the auscultation of breath sounds is adequate to control the tube position. The blind left bronchial insertion is more difficult for anatomical reasons and some ways to solve the problem have been described [8,12]. But, in our opinion the blind left bronchus intubation is not advised. Instead, guidance of the tube and the control of its correct position with a fiber-optical bronchoscope (FOB) are recommended. A suitable FOB size in infants is 2.2 mm OD or less.

The tube should be cuffed to obtain good seal and satisfying lung collapse. In case of left lung surgery, the placement of the tube in the right main bronchus will cause the exclusion of the upper lobe bronchus with subsequent atelectasis of the upper right lobe and hypoxia. For this reason the right bronchial intubation is not recommended [14]. The problems occurring with selective bronchial intubation are poor lung isolation and difficulty in quickly re-establishing ventilation of both lungs if hypoxia should develop during surgery, since the tube manipulation under the surgical drapes is very dangerous. Moreover, if main bronchus intubation does not give a completely effective bronchus occlusion, it will be necessary to achieve the lung collapse with an intrapleural insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 is absorbed into the blood circulation, and this event can be responsible for the development of hypercapnia and acidosis [1,8,14].

Bronchial Blocker

In the seventies a Fogarty embolectomy catheter was used as bronchial blocker; a 2-3 French size Fogarty inserted outside the tracheal tube was considered suitable for OLV in infants. The low-volume high-pressure balloon can cause damage to bronchial mucosa. Moreover this catheter does not have an internal lumen [15]. The Arndt endobronchial blocker 5 French (Arndt Endobronchial Blocker, Cook, Bloomington, USA) represents an improvement in the research for a balloon-tipped catheter suitable for infants, with a high-volume low-pressure balloon, an internal lumen containing a flexible wire stylet with a loop at its end and a special adaptor (Arndt Multiport Airway Adapter) with three ports: One of them accommodating the bronchial blocker, the second one the FOB and the third one the connector for the ventilation circuit. This adaptor allows the prosecution of infant's ventilation during the whole procedure. In infants, whose trachea does not allow the insertion of a tracheal tube large enough to accommodate within it the blocker and the FOB, the Arndt blocker 5Fr is inserted through its port in the adaptor before the tracheal tube, thus remaining outside of the tracheal tube. In this way, the extraluminal placement of the blocker leaves more room for ventilation. The FOB is then inserted through its port; the FOB tip must pass through the blocker loop and advance into the mainstem bronchus, which must be blocked. Now the balloon is slowly inflated under FOB direct vision with small volumes of air, depending on the size of the bronchial blocker. At this point the FOB may be removed. Lung auscultation will confirm the silence of breath on the blocked side.

It is suggested to check the correct position of the balloon in the bronchus after turning the child from supine to lateral position, to exclude the dislodgment of the blocker. Some authors suggest placing the blocker when the child is already in the lateral position [16].

After checking the correct position and inflation of the bronchial blocker balloon, the wire guide must be removed to leave the channel available for the lung deflation, for aspiration and for oxygen delivery.

The bronchial blocker allows effective collapse of the diseased lung and isolation of the healthy lung; moreover, it allows the fast switch from OLV to two-lung ventilation when necessary.

The insertion procedure must be made with extreme care to avoid complications such as dislodgment of the balloon into the trachea or airway injury.

Anesthetic Technique

Both inhalation and intravenous techniques are described for the anesthesia of infants undergoing VATS; it seems that inhalational agents might inhibit the HPV and be responsible for an intrapulmonary shunt increase and hypoxia, but a Cochrane database consultation does not indicate reviews or clinical randomized trials showing differences in outcome between intravenous and inhalational agents [17]. This conclusion has been confirmed by other authors [18,19].

A large bore intravenous access is mandatory, since the time necessary to stop bleeding from a large vessel is longer in VATS than in open surgery [19].

Several methods are available to support the infant's respiratory exchanges during OLV A tidal volume of 8-10 ml/Kg to the ventilated lung, intermittent or continuous positive airway pressure to the non-ventilated lung, intermittent or continuous positive airway pressure to the non-ventilated lung, intermittent insufflations to the non-ventilated lung or to both lungs can prevent atelectasis. If hypoxia already exists, a higher oxygen fraction is recommended.

Electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oxymetry, end-tidal CO2 concentration and body temperature represent standard monitoring of infants undergoing VATS.

Infants and small children are prone to hypothermia during anesthesia and surgery; it is not clear yet if thoracoscopy is responsible for hypothermia or hyperthermia [8]. In any case, the temperature should be monitored as in all long-lasting surgical procedures performed in children.

Some authors recommend the placement of an arterial line to check blood gas values [14,20]. Hypercarbia can occur during VATS due to hypoventilation and CO2 insufflation into the chest when the seal of the bronchial tube is not reliable [14]; non-invasive monitoring cannot detect the real amount of arterial CO2 value because of the discrepancy existing between end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) and arterial CO2: EtCO2 underestimates the CO2 arterial pressure. The difference is due to increased physiologic dead space. Nevertheless, EtCO2 monitoring is very helpful for detecting ventilation problems: The complete loss of EtCO2 curve means that the balloon cuff is dislodged into the trachea. A moderate hypercarbia can be accepted, provided that oxygen saturation is adequate; when acidosis occurs ventilation must be adjusted [15,21].

Informed Consent

The anesthesiologist should be very clear and exhaustive in providing information. While some surgeons might minimize the procedure ("only three small holes"), parents must know that, along with the benefits, there are also some risks whose frequency and severity must be explained. Minimally invasive surgery does not mean minimal risk [19].

Postoperative Pain

Thoracoscopic surgery causes less postoperative pain than open surgery because it is less invasive; the injection of a topical anesthetic agent in the surgical incisions is an easy way to reduce pain. A paravertebral block with a continuous infusion of a topical anesthetic agent guarantees pain prevention and treatment [22,23]. While thoracotomy requires a two-three days of analgesia, pain resulting from thoracoscopic surgery is of shorter duration and less relevant, probably due to the low invasiveness of the procedure and to the reduced need of the chest tube [24].


VATS is a safe alternative to open surgery in infants. OLV is feasible, but not mandatory: Small children often do not tolerate it and Vats may be performed with conventional ventilation and comparable results [6]. Some benefits of VATS are undisputed, such as cosmetic, musculoskeletal benefits and reduction of postoperative pain; others are the subject of debate, such as length of hospital stay and rate of complications: Some authors found no differences in hospital length of stay, chest tube duration and short-term complication rate between thoracoscopy and open access surgery [3,24]; recent meta-analysis shows that hospital stay and the introduction of the chest tube are of longer duration after the open approach [21], but the complication rate is similar between the two procedures.


We thank Dr. F Giusti, our mentor of pediatric anesthesia.

Conflict of Interest

Authors certify that they have no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.


  1. Lau CT, Leung J, Hui TW, Wong KK (2014) Thoracoscopic operations in children. Hong Kong Med J 20: 234-240.

  2. Lau CT, Leung J, Chan IH, Chung PH, Lan LC, et al. (2013) Thoracoscopic resection of congenital cystic lung lesions is associated with better post-operative outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 29: 341-345.

  3. Kunisaki SM, Powelson IA, Haydar B, Bowshier BC, Jarboe MD, et al. (2014) Thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy in infants and young children with congenital lung malformations. J Am Coll Surg 218: 261-270.

  4. Rothenberg SS (2008) First decade's experience with thoracoscopic lobectomy in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 43: 40-44.

  5. Hammer GB (2004) Single lung ventilation in infants and children. Pediatr Anesth 14: 98 102.

  6. Dingemann C, Zoeller C, Bataineh Z, Osthaus A, Suempelmann R, et al. (2013) Single- and double-lung ventilation in infants and children undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection. Eur J Pediatr Surg 23: 48-52.

  7. Bataineh ZA, Zoeller C, Dingemann C, Osthaus A, Suempelmann R, et al. (2012) Our experience with single lung ventilation in thoracoscopic paediatric surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg 22: 17-20.

  8. Hyo-Jin Byon, Ji-Won Lee, Jong-Kuk Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Young Tae Kim, et al. (2010) Anesthetic management of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pediatric patients: The issue of safety in infants and younger children. Korean J Anesthesiol 59: 99-103.

  9. Choudhry DK (2005) Single-lung ventilation in pediatric anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 23: 693-708.

  10. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Pink L, McGhee A, Hickey A, et al. (2002) Effect of posture on oxygen and respiratory muscle strain in infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 86: 147-150.

  11. Oak SN, Parelkar SV, Satishkumar KV, Pathak R, Ramesh BH, et al. (2009) Review of video-assisted thoracoscopy in children. J Minim Access Surg 5: 57 62.

  12. Fabila TS, Menghraj SJ (2013) One lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 57: 339-344.

  13. Hsieh VC, Thompson DR, Haberkern CM (2015) Pediatric endobronchial blockers in infants: A refinement in technique. Pediatr Anaesth 25: 438-439.

  14. Sutton CJ, Naguib A, Puri S, Sprenker CJ, Camporesi EM (2012) One-lung ventilation in infants and small children: Blood gas values. J Anesth 26: 670-674.

  15. Tan GM, Tan-Kendrick AP (2002) Bronchial diameters in children--use of the Fogarty catheter for lung isolation in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 30: 615-618.

  16. Disma N, Mameli L, Pini-Prato A, Montobbio G (2011) One lung ventilation with Arndt pediatric bronchial blocker for thoracoscopic surgery in children: A unicentric experience. Pediatr Anesth 21: 465-467.

  17. (2013) Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and cochrane database of systematic reviews. Cochrane Library 7.

  18. Fischer GW, Cohen E (2010) An update on anesthesia for thoracoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23: 7-11.

  19. Mukhtar AM, Obayah GM, Elmasry A, Dessouky NM (2008) The therapeutic potential of intraoperative hypercapnia during video assisted thoracoscopy in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 106: 84-88.

  20. Templeton TW, Downard MG, Simpson CR, Zeller KA, Templeton LB, et al. (2016) Bending the rules: A novel approach to placement and retrospective experience with the 5 French Arndt endobronchial blocker in children < 2 years. Pediatr Anesth 26: 512-520.

  21. Nasr A, Bass J (2012) Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: A meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 47: 857-861.

  22. Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, et al. (2008) A Systematic review of randomized trials evaluating Regional Techniques for Post thoracotomy Analgesia. Anesth Analg 107: 1026-1040.

  23. Feltracco P, Ori C (2007) A new look at the paravertebral block: A percutaneous video-assisted technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 32: 538-539.

  24. Polites SF, Habermann EB, Zarroug AE, Thomsen KM, Potter DD (2016) Thoracoscopic Vs open resection of congenital cystic lung disease utilization and outcomes in 1120 children in the United States. J Pediatr Surg 51: 1101-1105.