RESEARCH ARTICLE | VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1 | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2572-4061.1510009

Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Zinc Oxide (Zno) Nanoparticles Using Human Cell Lines

A Rama Narsimha Reddy* and L Srividya

Department of Pharmacology, Jyothishmathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India

*Corresponding author: Dr. A Rama Narsimha Reddy, M. Pharm, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Jyothishmathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beside LMD Police Station, Nusthulapur, Karimnagar-505 481, India, Tel: 09908457927.

Accepted: March 13, 2018 | Published: March 16, 2018

Citation: Reddy ARN, Srividya L (2018) Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Nanoparticles Using Human Cell Lines. J Toxicol Risk Assess 4:009. doi.org/10.23937/2572-4061.1510009

Copyright: © 2018 Reddy ARN, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract


The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro toxicity of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles against human alveolar epithelial (A549) cells and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK cells). The toxic effects of nanoparticles were analyzed after 24 hours of incubation with different cell lines using trypan blue dye exclusion method. Incubation of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles with different cells produced a dose dependent inhibition of growth of the cells. The TC50 values (toxic concentration 50 i.e. concentration of particles inducing 50% cell mortality) of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were found in the range of 33 - 37 μg/ml.

Keywords


Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, A459, HEK, Cytotoxicity, In vitro

Introduction


Nanoparticles (range of 1-100 nm) have possessing a much higher specific surface area (SSA) than their larger counterparts of the same materials Thus, Nanoparticles (NP) exhibit specific physicochemical properties and functions [1]. ZnO nanoparticles have received considerable attention in recent years because of their potential use in electronic and industrial applications. Nanoscale ZnO materials are already being used in the cosmetic and sunscreen industry due to their transparency and ability to reflect, scatter, and absorb UV radiation [2]. ZnO nanomaterials are also being considered for use in next-generation biological applications including antimicrobial agents, drug delivery, bioimaging probes, and cancer treatment [3,4]. ZnO nanoparticles are useful as antibacterial and antifungal agents when incorporated into materials, such as surface coatings (paints), textiles, and plastics. ZnO nanoparticles used as an additive into products including plastics, ceramics, glass, cement, rubber (e.g. car tyres), lubricants, paints, ointments, adhesives, sealants, pigments, foods (source of Zn nutrient), batteries, ferrites, fire retardants, etc. The increasing potential applications of zinc oxide nanoparticles provide strong impetus to investigate potential toxic effects of these materials. In occupational settings these nanoparticles get released as aerosol and may inhaled, ingested by the persons who are working there. We have previously reported the pulmonary and extrapulmonary toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles using rat intratracheal instillation model [5]. Kaviyarasu, et al. [6] reported the cytotoxic effects of cadmium selenide nanoparticles using A549 cell lines. Kaviyarasu, et al. [7] also reported the In vitro cytotoxicity effect and antibacterial performance of human lung epithelial cells A549 activity of Zinc oxide doped TiO2 nanocrystals. Recently, Jia-Hui, et al. [8] reported the in vivo low toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in mice. In support of in vivo studies, the present study was aimed to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles using A549 and HEK cells.

Materials and Methods


Particle types-characterization

Carbonyl iron (4.5-5.2 •m; > 98% purity) and Quartz fine powder (> 230 mesh; 58-68 μm; 99.94% purity) and were obtained from Sigma, USA and SD fine chemicals, Mumbai, India, respectively. ZnO nanoparticles obtained from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA. Size and crystallinity are determined by Dynamic Light Scattering Spectroscopy (DLS), and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1: Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles. View Table 1

Experimental set-up

To evaluate the cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles, two different human cell types, alveolar cells (A549 cells), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK cells) were employed using trypan blue assay. The toxic effects of nanoparticles were analyzed after 24 hours of incubation with these two cell lines.

Cell culture and treatment

Human alveolar epithelial (A549) cells and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK cells) were purchased from National centre for cell service (NCCS, Pune), India. These cell lines were grown and maintained using suitable media (DMEM/RPMI 1640, HiMedia, Mumbai, India). All the cell lines were grown in culture medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, HiMedia, Mumbai, India), 1% L-glutamine (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B antibiotic solution (HiMedia, India). Cells were seeded in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks (tarsons, India), at 2,50,000 cells/flask in a total volume of 9 ml. When confluent, all the cells were trypsinized (using Trypsin-EDTA, HiMedia, Mumbai, India), and seeded in 6-well plates (tarsons, India) at a rate of 1,50,000/0.3 ml. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were washed 3 times with culture medium without any additive (FBS or antibiotics), and particle suspension (in phosphate buffer saline, (PBS) + 0.1% between 80) or medium alone was added to each well. For each nanomaterial, a stock solution of 1000 μg/ml particle in culture medium without any additive was prepared, vortex at maximum speed for 1 minute and bath-sonicated for 5 minutes. Different concentrations of nanoparticles in culture medium were prepared and used (100 - 1 μg/ml). Preliminary experiments demonstrated the necessity to add 0.1% Tween 80 to the culture medium to obtain a homogenous suspension for two nanoparticles. Cells were exposed for 24 h to medium alone or in presence of nanomaterials. At that time, trypan blue viability assay (see below) was performed to evaluate the toxicity of nanoparticles on different cell types.

Trypan blue dye exclusion method

Trypan blue dye exclusion method was used particularly to avoid the interference of nanoparticles during the assay procedure of absorbance [9,10]. For this assay, 6 well plates were used. At the end of the exposure (24 hours) of nanoparticles to cells, the medium was discarded and all the wells were washed with 200 μl Phosphate Buffer Solution. Now, all the cells were trypsinized and to this (100 μl) cell suspension, 100 μl of 0.4 w/v trypan blue (sigma, USA) was added and mixed well. After 5 min, an aliquot (10 μl) of dye-cell suspension mixture was loaded onto hemocytometer by carefully touching the edge of the cover slip with the pipette tip and each chamber is allowed to fill by capillary action. Viable cells were counted in all four 1 mm corner squares. A separate count was maintained for viable and non-viable cells. The % inhibition of growth was calculated by comparing the % viability in the well with test compound with that of the control.

Statistical analysis

When at least 2 viability values were below 50% of control condition, the TC50 (toxic concentration 50, concentration of particles inducing 50% cell mortality) was calculated using GraphPad Prism software (logarithmic transformation of X-values and non-linear regression - sigmoidal dose-response analysis with variable slope- with bottom and top constrains set at 0 and 100 respectively). If a TC50 could be calculated, TC25 and TC75 were calculated (respectively concentration corresponding to 75 and 25% viability), using the following equation:

TCf = [(f/100-f)**1/H]*TC50

Where f: percentage that needs to be calculated; H: hillslope; *: multiply; **: to the power.

Results


The cytotoxicity data of ZnO nanoparticles using trypan blue dye exclusion assay on 2 different human cell lines are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Cytotoxicity of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (Trypan blue assay). View Table 2

Similar to the quartz (a known toxic agent), exposure of ZnO nanoparticles to the different cells produced a dose dependent inhibition of growth of cells, resulting in reduction in % viability of the cells in nanoparticles exposed wells. For all the nanoparticles TC50, TC25 and TC75 values (respectively concentration corresponding to 50, 75 and 25% viability) were calculated on all the cell types and were shown in Table 2.

Discussion


In this study, the in vitro cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles against two different (A549, HEK cells) human cell lines using trypan blue dye exclusion assay method to assess the systemic toxicity of these nanoparticles after their exposure (by inhalation/aspiration, ingestion etc) to humans. The results of the present study showed the dose dependent cytotoxicity of nanoparticles against all cell types tested the TC50 values of ZnO nanoparticles were found in the range of 33 - 37 μg/ml, which were comparable to that of quartz (30.5 μg/ml), indicating the greater cytotoxicity.

The solubility of ZnO NPs is the pivotal factor in causing cytotoxicity in vitro. Zn2+ at a low concentration is essential for maintaining the cellular processes and metabolism; however, Zn2+ at a high concentration can cause toxicity [11]. ZnO NPs can induce a cell death via apoptosis through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway [11,12]. ZnO NPs treatment in vitro has been shown to decrease mitochondrial membrane potential and conversely increase Bax/Bcl2 ratio. Moreover, excessive release of Zn2+ was shown to be sequestered by the mitochondrion [13]. Presence of cations aids to regulate ATP synthesis and ROS production in mitochondrion. Conversely, the rapid Zn2+ influx results in a rapid decline of mitochondrial membrane potential which subsequently activates the caspase-dependent apoptosis and release of LDH [11]. The present study supports the results of Cheng, et al. [14] which showed that ZnO NPs can cause toxicity by ER stress, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, which are closely associated with ROS generation and inevitably lead to cell death in vitro.

Conclusion


The results of the study revealed the dose dependent cytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles using tested cell cultures which supports the results of in vivo toxicity studies of these nanoparticles.

References


  1. Oberdorster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, et al. (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2: 8.

  2. Nohynek GJ, Lademann J, Ribaud C, Roberts MS (2007) Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Crit Rev Toxicol 37: 251-277.

  3. Padmavathy N, Vijayaraghavan R (2009) Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles-an antimicrobial study. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9: 1.

  4. Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock AK, Zweck A (2006) The emerging nanomedicine landscape. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1211-1217.

  5. Shilpa G, Anreddy RNR (2012) Toxicological studies of zinc oxide nanomaterials in rats. Toxicol and Environmental Chemistry 94: 1768-1779.

  6. Kaviyarasu K, Kanimozhi K, Matinise N, Maria MC, Mola GT, et al. (2017) Antiproliferative effects on human lung cell lines A549 activity of cadmium selenide nanoparticles extracted from cytotoxic effects: Investigation of bio-electronic application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 76: 1012-1025.

  7. Kaviyarasu K, Kanimozhi K, Matinise N, Maria MC, Mola GT (2017) In vitro cytotoxicity effect and antibacterial performance of human lung epithelial cells A549 activity of Zinc oxide doped TiO2 nanocrystals. Materials Science and Engineering C 74: 325-333.

  8. Jia-Hui Liu, Xin Ma, Yingying Xu, Huan Tang, Sheng-Tao Yang, et al. (2017) Low toxicity and accumulation of zinc oxide nanoparticles in mice after 270-day consecutive dietary supplementation. Toxicol Res 6: 134-143.

  9. Massimo B, Shane B, Konstantina N, Nunzio B, Stefano B, et al. (2006) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes induce T lymphocyte apoptosis. Toxicol Lett 160: 121-126.

  10. Shukla A, Macpherson MB, Hillegass J, Ramos-Nino ME, Alexeeva V, et al. (2009) Alterations in gene expression in human mesothelial cells correlate with mineral pathogenicity. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 41: 114-123.

  11. Kao YY, Chen YC, Cheng TJ, Chiung YM, Liu PS (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles interfere with zinc ion homeostasis to cause cytotoxicity. Toxicol Sci 125: 462-472.

  12. Guo D, Bi H, Liu B, Wu Q, Wang D, et al. (2013) Reactive oxygen species-induce cytotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in rat retinal ganglion cells. Toxicol In Vitro 27: 731-738.

  13. Sensi SL, Ton-That D, Sullivan PG, Jonas EA, Gee KR, et al. (2003) Modulation of mitochondrial function by endogenous Zn2+ pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6157-6162.

  14. Cheng TN, Liang QY, Manoor PH, Ong CN, Yu LE, et al. (2017) Zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibit cytotoxicity and genotoxicity through oxidative stress responses in human lung fibroblasts and Drosophila melanogaster. Int J Nanomedicine 12: 1621-1637.