logo

Review Timeline | CrossMark Policy | ClinMed Features
   

Need a supporting hand in manuscript formatting? Write to our team.
Assistance in presubmission | editorialoffice@clinmedjournals.org

     
International Archives of
Cardiovascular Diseases
REVIEW ARTICLE | VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1 | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/iacvd-2017/1710002

Hyper-Homocysteinemia and other Inherited Thrombophilic Factors Inducing Retinal Vein Occlusion. The Employment of Novel Orals Anti-Coagulants is Possible?

Federico Cacciapuoti

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Campania, Italy

*Corresponding author: Federico Cacciapuoti, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Campania, "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza L. Miraglia, 280138-Naples, Italy, Tel: 0815665022, E-mail: fulviocacciapuoti@gmail.com

Received: June 19, 2017| Accepted: November 16, 2017 | Published: November 18, 2017

Citation: Cacciapuoti F (2017) Hyper-Homocysteinemia and other Inherited Thrombophilic Factors Inducing Retinal Vein Occlusion. The Employment of Novel Orals Anti-Coagulants is Possible?. Int Arch Cardiovasc Dis 1:002. doi.org/10.23937/iacvd-2017/1710002

Copyright: © 2017 Cacciapuoti F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract


Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) is the second cause of unilateral visual loss, and can have ischemic or non-ischemic aetiology. The causes inducing RVO may be due to thrombophilia induced by acquired or inherited risk factors. We refer on inherited thrombophilic factors alone, such as Hyper-Homocysteinemia (HHcy) (due to Methylene-Tetra-Hydro-Folate Reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation), primary antiphospholipid syndrome, factor V Leiden mutation, protein C, protein S and antithrombin deficiencies, and prothrombin mutation. Medical treatment for RVO prevention, has been based on traditional anticoagulant drugs (heparins and oral vitamin K antagonists). But, New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs), already employed with positive effects in other venous thromboses, such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism a venous thromboembolism, could be considered in order to treat RVO both in acute phase and chronically, for prevent further events. But, the contemporary employment of antiplatelet agents and NOACs must be considered in RVO-HHcy induced.

Keywords


Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO), Thrombophilic risk factors, Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs)

Introduction


Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) consists in the blockage of venous circulation that drains the retina. It is a rather frequent complication and represents the second most common cause of vision-threatening retinal disease in ageing patients [1]. Usually, RVO is directly caused by hypercoagulability and/or slowing down of vein retinal drainage [2]. In few cases, thrombotic accumulation in the adjacent central retinal artery compresses the retinal vein causing a turbulent flow of vein retinal circulation, indirectly responsible for RVO. According to the different degree of occlusion, RVO is further divided in ischemic and non-ischemic, each having different indications for prognosis and treatment [3]. The difference is based on the area of capillary non-perfusion. In addition, in accordance with the site of occlusion, two types of RVO may be identified: Branch RVO (BRVO) and Central RVO (CRVO) [4]. BRVO is a blockage of the small veins of the retina. Inversely, CRVO consists in the occlusion of the central retinal vein. The visual prognosis is worse in those affected by CRVO than in patients with BRVO [5]. The risk of recurrence of RVO in the same eye or in the fellow eye is negligible and the cause of flow-restoration after RVO is unknown still now [6], even though it could be related to the balance of coagulation and anticoagulation [7,8].

As previously affirmed, thrombophilia is a cause of RVO, that may be acquired or inherited. Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, increased plasma lipoprotein (a) Levels, advanced age and cigarette smoking, have been reported as acquired risk factors for RVO [9]. Other conditions, such as pregnancy, surgery, cancers, some myeloproliferative disorders, and the use of certain medications (i.e. contraceptive and menopausal hormone) may be also responsible of acquired thrombophilia [10]. On the contrary, Hyper-Homocysteinemia (H-Hcy) and Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) [11,12] can be causes of both acquired or congenital thrombophilia.

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been published searching for different genetic thrombophilic factors conferred by genes deriving from one or both parents. An inherited thrombophilic risk factor is: Congenital HHcy by Methylene-Tetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation. Other inherited risk factors are: Primary APS; factor V Leiden mutation; prothrombin gene mutation; protein C and protein S and antithrombin deficiencies [13-15].

In this review, we will illustrate the risk factors of inherited thrombophilia alone and debate about their possible mechanisms of RVO.

Inherited HHcy

Hcy is a sulfhydryl-containing amino-acid and represents an intermediate metabolite of the methionine cycle. The product can be further remethylated to methionine or trans-sulphurated to cysteine. Its reduced serum concentration happens for remethylation, through the enzyme Methylene-Tetrahydro-Folate Reductase (MTHFR). On the contrary, the genetic defect of this enzyme is a cause of inherited HHcy. MTHFR contains two cytosine nucleotides at position 677 (677CC).

One cytosine nucleotide might be replaced by timine (C677T) in a single helix of DNA (heterozygotes) or in both helices (homozygotes). Homozygotes have approximately 70% reduction of normal MTHFR activity, whereas heterozygotes have almost 40% reduction of normal enzyme activity. C677T gene mutation of MTHFR enzyme is a most frequent cause of congenital H-Hcy, responsible for inherited thrombophilia [16,17]. But, although a correlation between C677T mutation and RVO was hypothesized, the role of this mutation in RVO pathogenesis remains unclear. In this connection, a recent meta-analysis of Li, et al. confirmed no significant association between MTHFR C677T genotype and RVO [18].

It is known that HHcy is a risk factor for both arterial and venous disease. Specifically, moderate HHcy is a frequent and independent risk factor for premature coronary, cerebral and peripheral diseases. But, the association of HHcy with venous thrombosis was also shown. That generally occurs in heterozygotes with mild HHcy and Factor V Leiden mutation and involves a 10-fold increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism. Among the modalities hypothesized by thrombophilia depending on HHcy in the RVO pathogenesis there are: The toxic action of Hcy on endothelial cells, the impairment of thrombomodulin expression, the activation of factor V, the low-density lipoproteins oxidation, and the inhibition of activated of protein C [19].

Antiphospholipid syndrome

APS can be both primary and secondary to another pathology, such as lupus erythematous, infection or pregnancy [20]. Although the precise mechanism whereby APS can induce a hypercoagulable state remains unclear, some theories have been advanced. Among these, inhibition of C protein pathway, inhibition of its activation, or inhibitions of antithrombin activity are included. The most common venous thrombosis associated to anticardiolipin antibodies is Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE), but sometimes these antibodies may also cause RVO [21].

Factor V Leiden mutation

Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is found as a common cause of inherited thrombophilia [22,23]. It involves a G (guanine) to A (adenine) substitution at nucleotide 1691. This mutation is characterized by a poor anticoagulant response to Activated Protein C (APC) that favors an increased risk for venous thromboembolism [24]. Therefore, the terms FVL mutation and APC resistance should be considered synonymous. Heterozygous mutation of FLV increases the risk of venous thrombus 3-to 7 fold, while homozygous mutation increases the risk to approximately 80 fold. Some authors reported the prevalence of FVL mutation both in CRVO [25] and BRVO [26]. Recurrent BRVO induced by Factor V Leiden mutation was also described by Banik and coll [26]. Salim, et al. reported a case of young woman with CRVO due to a hypercoagulable state secondary to FLV mutation, despite systemic anticoagulation therapy [27]. Other authors refer on CRVO occurrence by FLV despite the use of warfarin [28].

Prothrombin mutation

A point mutation of prothrombin was identified at position 20210 (change G-A). Specifically, prothrombin mutation causes elevated plasma prothrombin levels, increasing thrombin formation. In turn, high prothrombin serum levels induce activated protein C resistance and promote formation of abnormal fibrin networks. Prothrombin mutation is associated with venous thromboembolism and previous literature clearly illustrated its role in mediating RVO [29].

Natural anticoagulant deficiencies

Deficiencies of natural anticoagulants are rare and, combined are found in less than 15% of all individuals. Specifically, Protein C (PC) deficiency occurs 1 every 200/500 people, whereas Protein S (PS) deficiency is expected 1 every 500 individuals, and antithrombin III (AT III) deficiency is present 1 every 2000/5000 persons.

In particular, deficiencies of activated PC and PS are responsible for inhibition of some anticoagulant cofactors (factor Va and factor VIIIa), while AT III deficiency acts by inhibiting the serine proteases (factor III, X, XI, XII). Inherited deficiencies of these anticoagulants represent important risk factors for RVO, particularly in young individuals [30]. Therefore, although the prevalence of these deficiencies is low, they should be screened for all thrombophilic patients affected by RVO [31-33].

Treatment


Thrombophilia is a condition predisposing to thrombosis occurring both in arterial vessels and in veins. Obviously, different anti-thrombotic treatments are requested for these two conditions. Arterial thrombi must be treated with antiplatelet drugs, while venous thrombosis requires anticoagulant compounds [34].

RVO is consequent to retinal vein thrombosis happening directly, via slowing down, hypercoagulability, and turbulence of retinal vein flow or (less frequently) indirectly, via compression of blood venous flow and subsequent it's slowing down, performed by adjacent arterial retinal thrombus previously organized. Therefore, both in acute phase and to prevent recurrent events, RVO-patients may benefit from anticoagulant drugs. Current guidelines recommend an initial treatment with Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs) [35]. These are useful for their additional properties, such as anti-angiogenic effect [36], anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties [37-39]. Practically, if diagnosed within 15 days, LWMH must be administered for two first weeks. Afterwards, LWMH treatment must be followed by oral Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs), for long-term anticoagulation. Regular coagulation-time monitoring and dose adjustment of VKAs, to maintain the Index of Normalization Ratio (INR) in the therapeutic range are required for whole duration of therapy. My experience performed in few cases only of RVO-HHcy dependent, confirms these therapeutic modalities. In fact, a partial improvement of visual acuity was obtained when LWMH was used in the early phase for 1-3 months in comparison with those received antiplatelet drugs. Successively, aspirin was administered again, to prevent possible cardiovascular events induced by inherited HHcy. The Guidelines of the Royal College of Ophtalmologists also recommend against the use of antiplatelets for primary prevention of RVO [40]. But referring to RVO-HHcy induced, recently Ageno, et al. on purpose of the treatment of venous thrombosis in unusual sites, affirmed that RVO-HHcy related appears to be a different disease entity caused by either local or systemic cardiovascular risk factors. For this reason, the need for anticoagulant therapy is extremely uncertain and antiplatelet agents are frequently prescribed [41].

In recent years, Novel Oral Anticoagulant Drugs (NOACs) have developed [42]. These offer a number of advantages over VKAs, such as predictable dose response, fewer during drug and interactions, and no need for laboratory monitoring of the INR or other coagulation tests. These drugs were already successfully employed to prevent DVT, PE, Venous Thrombo-Embolism (VTE) and recurrent events [43]. Nevertheless, several uncertaines still persist about the use of NOACs instead of antithrombotic drugs in RVO-dependent by inherited thrombophilia, as HHcy, because of concomitant pro-thrombotic effects of that, favouring atherosclerotic lesions. With reference to the venous thromboses induced by inherited thrombophilia in unusual sites. Undas and Goralczyk in a serie of 33 patients with severe thrombophilia provided the first-life experience with Non-Vitamin K Antagonists Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs), given instead of VKAs (warfarin or acenocumarol) [44]. In this study, thrombophilia was dependent on anti-thrombin deficiency, Protein C, or Protein S deficiencies, Factor V Leiden or pro-thrombin G20210A mutations, but not on HHcy, and AA did not discussed this occurrence. In my opinion, in the presence of RVO-HHcy induced, at antiplatelet drugs (previously administered to prevent athero-thrombotic events), should be added NOACs. These will be given at the same time, both in acute phase and during the following 3-6 months.

Disclosure Statement


The Author declares to have no conflict of interests.

References


  1. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Meuer SM (2000) The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: The beaver dam eye study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98: 133-143.

  2. Williamson TH (1997) Central vein occlusion: What's the story? Br J Ophthalmol 81: 698-704.

  3. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P (1994) Incidence of various types of retinal vein occlusion and their recurrence and demographic characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol 117: 429-441.

  4. Hayreh SS (2005) Prevalent misconceptions about acute retinal occlusive disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res 24: 493-519.

  5. Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N, Lim L, Wang JJ, et al. (2010) The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: Pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia and Australia. Ophtalmology 117: 313-319.e1.

  6. McIntosh RL, Rogers SL, Lim L, Cheung N, Wang JJ, et al. (2010) Natural history of central vein occlusion: An evidence-based systematic review. Ophtalmology 117: 1113-1123.e15.

  7. Chan CC, Green WR, Rice TA (1986) Experimental occlusion of the retinal vein. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 224: 507-512.

  8. Meissner MH, Zieler BK, Bergelin RO, Chandler WL, Eugene D, et al. (2002) Coagulation, fibrinolysis, and recanalization after acute deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 5: 278-285.

  9. Martínez F, Furió E, Fabiá MJ, Pérez AV, González-Albert V, et al. (2014) Risk factors associated with retinal vein occlusion. Int J Clin Pract 68: 871-881.

  10. Stem MS, Talwar N, Comer GM, Stein JD (2013) A longitudinal analysis of risk factors associated with central retinal vein occlusion. Ophtalmology 120: 362-370.

  11. Chau B, Kifley A, Wong TY, Michell P (2005) Homocysteine and retinal vein occlusion: A population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol 139: 181-182.

  12. Kim JK, Kim MY, Yu HS, Jong HK, Hwang IS, et al. (2001) Retinal vein occlusion in two patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Korean J Intern Med 16: 274-276.

  13. Bekhouse O, Parapia I, Mahomed I, Lee D (2000) Familial thrombophilia and vein occlusion. Eye (Lond) 14: 13-17.

  14. Fegan CD (2002) Central vein occlusion and thrombophilia. Eye (Lond) 16: 98-106.

  15. Bertina RM, Koeleman BP, Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Dirven RJ, et al. (1994) Mutation in the blood coagulation Factor V associated with resistance to associated protein C. Nature 369: 64-67.

  16. Martin SC, Rauz S, Marr JE, Martin N, Jones AF, et al. (2000) Plasma total homocysteine and retinal vascular disease. Eye (Lond) 14: 590-593.

  17. Xianhui Qin, Jianping Li, Yimin Cui, Zeyuan Liu, Zhigang Zhao, et al. (2012) MTHFR C677T and A2756G polymorphisms and the homocysteine lowering efficacy of different doses of folic acid Chinese adults. Nutr J 11: 2.

  18. Li D, Zhou M, Peng X, Sun H (2014) Homocysteine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and risk of retinal vein occlusion: An updated meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 14: 147.

  19. Hajjar KA (1993) Homocysteine-induced modulation of tissue plasminogen activator binding to its endothelial cell membrane receptor. J Clin Invest 91: 2873-2879.

  20. RA Asherson, P Merry, JF Acheson, EN Harris, GR Hughes (1989) Antiphospholipid antibodies: A risk factor for occlusive ocular vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematous and the 'primary' antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 48: 358-361.

  21. Rehak M, Muller M, Scholz M, Wiercinska J, Niederweiser D, et al. (2009) Antiphospholipid syndrome and retinal vein occlusion. Meta-analysis of published studies. Ophthalmologe 106: 427-434.

  22. Larsson E, Olafsdottir A, Bauer B (1996) Activated protein C resistance in young adults with central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 80: 200-202.

  23. Greiner K, Peetz D, Winkgen A, Prellwitz W, Pfeiffer N, et al. (2001) Genetic thrombophilia in patients with retinal vascular occlusion. Int Ophthalmol 23: 155-160.

  24. Ciardella AP, Yanuzzi IA, Freund KB, Di Michele D, Nejat M, et al. (1998) Factor V leiden, activated protein C resistance and retinal vein occlusion. Retina 18: 308-315.

  25. Arsène S, Delahousse B, Regina S, Le Lez ML, Pisella PJ, et al. (2005) Increased prevalence of factor V Leiden in patients with retinal vein occlusion and under 60 years of age. Thromb Haemost 94: 101-106.

  26. Banik S, Bhutto HU, Bagga P (2006) Recurrent branch retinal vein occlusion with factor V leiden mutation. Eye (Lond) 20: 948-949.

  27. Salim S, Lam WC, Hanna W (2009) Central retinal vein occlusion with therapeutic level of anticoagulation. Case Reports in Medicine 2009: 827982.

  28. Browning DJ, Fraser CM (2004) Retinal vein occlusions in patients taking warfarin. Ophthalmology 111: 1196-1200.

  29. Glueck CJ, Wang P (2009) Ocular vascular thrombotic events: A diagnostic window to familial thrombophilia (compound factor V Leiden and prothrombin heterozygosity) and thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 15: 12-18.

  30. Bertram B, Remky A, Arend O, Wolf S, Reim M (1995) Protein C, Protein S, and antithrombin III in acute ocular occlusive diseases. Ger J Ophthalmol 4: 332-335.

  31. Tekeli O, Gursel E, Buyurgan H (1999) Protein C, Protein S and antithrombin III deficiencies in retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77: 628-630.

  32. Lipe B, Orstein DL (2011) Deficiences of natural anticoagulant, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Circulation 124: e365-e368.

  33. High KA (1998) Antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S. Naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins. Arch Pathol Lab Med 112: 28-36.

  34. Squizzato A, Manfredi E, Bozzato S, Dentali F, Ageno W (2010) Antithrombotic and fibrinolytic drugs for retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and a call for action. Thromb Haemost 103: 271-276.

  35. Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A, Crowther M, Hylek EM, et al. (2012) Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. (9th edn), American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141: e44S-e88S.

  36. Norrby K (2006) Low-molecular-weight heparins and angiogenesis. APMIS 114: 79-102.

  37. Moussavi S, Moradi M, Khorhidahmad T, Motamedi M (2015) Anti-inflammatory effects of heparin and its derivatives: A systematic review. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences 2015: 507151.

  38. Gorski A, Wasik M, Nowaczyk M, Korczak-Kowalska G (1991) Immunomodulating activity of heparin. FASEB J 5: 2287-2291.

  39. Lazo-Lagner A, Hawel J, Ageno W, Kovacs MJ (2010) Low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Haematologica 95: 1587-1593.

  40. The Royal College of Ophtalmologists (2010) Interim Guidelines for Management of Retinal Vein Occlusion.

  41. Ageno W, Beyer-Westendorf J, Garcia DA, Lazo-Langner A, McBane RD, et al. (2016) Guidance for the treatment of venous thrombosis in unusual sites. J Thromb Thrombolysis 41: 129-143.

  42. Elkelboom JW, Weitz JL (2010) New anticoagulants. Circulation 121: 1523-1532.

  43. Skelley JW, White CW, Thomson AR (2017) The use of direct oral anticoagulants in inherited thrombophilia. J Thromb Thrombolysis 43: 24-30.

  44. Undas A, Goralczyk T (2017) Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with severe inherited thrombophilia: A series of 33 patients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 28: 438-442.