Citation

Silva FCS, Silva DVR, Matos AB, Salgado AM, Queiroz M (2020) Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity of Suidasia pontifica with Allergens Blo t 5 from the Blomia tropicalis Mite. Int J Immunol Immunother 7:056. doi.org/10.23937/2378-3672/1410056

Original Research | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2378-3672/1410056

Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity of Suidasia pontifica with Allergens Blo t 5 from the Blomia tropicalis Mite

Francisca das Chagas Sobral Silva1,2*, Daniel Vasconcelos R Silva2, Anderson Bruno Matos2, Andrea Medeiros Salgado1 and Maria Queiroz2

1Department of Biochemical Engineering, School of Chemistry, Technology Center, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2Laboratory of Extracts Allergens MQ, Research and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Background

The immunological cross-reactivity between different species of dust mites such as Suidasia pontifica and Blomia tropicalis is a factor that can favor an immunotherapeutic treatment, having so great clinical relevancy. However, the pretreatment of the raw extract can potentialize its response as in the cross-reactivity analysis. Therefore, this paper seeks to pre-treat the Suidasia pontifica extract in order to obtain protein fractions by the "salt out" method and then evaluate the presence of cross-reactivity for the Blo t 5 allergen of Blomia tropicalis.

Method

Suidasia pontifica extracts were obtained by the protein precipitation with ammonium sulfate in percentages 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, 80-100% (w/v) at 0 °C. Precipitated fractions were evaluated by protein content, characterized by electrophoresis, and applied in Western Blot and ELISA tests, with positives and negatives controls using the recombinant antigen Blo t 5.

Results

With salt saturation level of 80% (w/v), it was achievable to efficiently separate proteins in the raw extract of Suidasia pontifica, resulting in a total content of 13.61 mg mL-1. The immunoassay ELISA exposed the existence of cross-reactivity for Blo t 5 allergen, for crude extract, with allergenic potency of 2.797 ng mL-1. This result was also confirmed by stains obtained in the blot in about 15-16 kDa. For fractions obtained between the percentages of 20 to 100% (w/v) of salt saturation and power was below 1.93 ng mL-1, at the border of the established limit of detection.

Conclusion

The "salt out" method is efficient at obtaining concentrated fractions of proteins, as observed when applied in Suidasia pontifica, extract, this being susceptible to cross-interactions, suggesting the possibility of this mite to act as an adjunct in immunotherapy on formulations for desensitization of allergic individuals.

Introduction

Dust mites are responsible for pathologies in the respiratory tract triggering cases of allergies in atopic individuals [1,2]. The dust mite species Suidasia pontifica, ((S. pontifica = SP)) can be found in domestic dust, in addition to grains and stored spices [3]. This mite is specially responsible for triggering allergic reactions mediated by specifics immunoglobulin [4]. Scientific studies show the cross-reactivity between dust mites such as Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatofagoides farinae, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Blomia tropicalis, Suidasia medanensis, and others species [5-7]. Studies that evaluate the cross-reactivity usually initiate with the preparation of the raw extract of the mite of interest [8,9] however, there is an absence of information that relates the efficiency in the preparation stage of these extracts with the performance of the cross-reactivity power. A novel investigation here is proposed, considering the relation between proteic concentration, obtained by fractional precipitation, and cross-reactivity for Blo t 5 allergen (B. tropicalis). The relevance of the cross-reactivity study between mite species S. pontifica and B. tropicalis can fulfill studies gaps that don't approach specifically the Blo t 5 allergen for this Suidasia species, which can also be interesting to evaluate this activity by optimization of "salting out" method. That is possible because the precipitation method, using ammonium sulfate, allows to separate proteins of different sizes, and consequently allergens with distinct molecular masses. Thus, it is expected amplification of cross-reactivity signal due to the optimized allergenic protein concentration of the extract under analysis.

Materials and Methods

Suidasia pontifica mite protein extraction

1.0 g of the Suidasia pontifica mite mass was macerated in the presence of 60.00 mL of sodium chloride extracting saline solution in a pH 9 alkaline medium. After 18 h of stirring under refrigeration at 8 °C, the extract was centrifuged and the supernatant filtered in 0.45 μm pre-filter. The protein content was determined by the Lowry method [10] and total carbohydrate as in [11].

Salting out precipitation

50.00 mL of the crude extract of the Suidasia pontifica mite was subjected to precipitation by sequential fractionation with ammonium sulfate in the salt saturation percentages of 0-20% (2.82 g), 20-40% (3.02 g), 40-60% (3.25g), 60-80% (3.50g) and 80-100% (3.80g) according to the procedure indicated by the literature [12]. The system was kept in an ice bath under agitation for 40 min. With the gradual increase in the salt mass, the solubilization time doubled. Afterwards, the extract was centrifuged at 5724 xg under 2 °C refrigeration for 30 minutes.

The pellets obtained after centrifugation were resuspended in 5.00 mL purified water and the aqueous supernatant returned to the ice system, for the other fractionation sequences. The precipitated fractions obtained for each percentage were stored at -20 °C, for further characterization.

Protein content determination

The precipitate protein contents for each fraction of saturation with the salt, (NH4)2SO4, were analyzed according to the Lowry method. For this, bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a standard protein and an analytical curve was built for a working range between 5.0 μg mL-1 to 100.0 μg mL-1. The absorbance readings were performed at 750 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Spectrophotometer SP 1102 - Bel Photonics - Brazil).

Immunoblotting

The proteins of the extracts were separated by Electrophoresis SDS-PAGE, in gradient gel 5-12.5%, and transferred to 0.45 μm pore nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). The membrane and gel containing the allergens were arranged in sandwich form, covered with a paper filter and compressed with polyurethane sponges, on the transfer support. All material was previously soaked in saline buffer solution at pH 7.2, consisting of 25 mM of Tris-Base, 192 mM of Glycine and 20% (v/v) of methanol. The slow transfer conditions were applied with constant amperage of 18 V, 10 mA and 70 W, for 18 h to 8 °C. To confirm the transfer of proteins from gel to nitrocellulose membrane, ponceau-S 0.2% dye solution (m/v) was added.

Serum from 15 individuals allergic to Blomia tropicalis mites confirmed after evaluation by immediate reading skin test (Prick Test) was used for the antigen-antibody reactivity test. The membrane containing the proteins was initially blocked, with bovine serum albumin solution (0.5%) in saline buffer (TBS) for 1h, under gentle agitation. Prior blockade was necessary in order to avoid nonspecific connections and background spots. After this period, the membrane was washed with TBS-T buffer containing 0.1% Tween and incubated in 20.0 mL of the serum pool containing IgE (1:10) for 5 h, under mild agitation. At the end of the established period the membrane was washed again with Tween solution for removal of excess primary antibody not attached to the membrane. The secondary antibody, human anti-IgE, specific epsilon chain, conjugated to the enzyme peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich), was diluted 1:200 in TBS buffer. The membrane was incubated in this solution for a period of 4h under slight agitation. The presence of effective antibody antigen bonds was investigated using the Amplifled Kit Opti-4CN /Bio-Rad).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) characterization

The extract of the mite Suidasia pontifica was analyzed by the ELISA method - Immunosorption Assay attached to the enzyme, by the construction of a standard curve of the allergen Blo t 5 (ELISA kit; recombinant Blo t 5 prepared in 1% BSA/50% glycerol/PBS, 0.22 μm filtered, preservative free, pH 7.4, Indoor Biotechnologies-USA), according to the literature Luczynska, et al. [13]. The allergenic protein concentration was built using the four-parameter logistic curve (4PL). Briefly, 100 μL of anti Blo t 5, (Monoclonal antibody, Indoor Biotechnologies- USA), was added to the polystyrene plate microplates (USA) as a capture molecule. After 18 hours of incubation at 8 °C the plate was washed with PBS-T saline buffer, the excess buffer was removed and blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA solution. After 1 hour of blocking, the plate was washed and the standard Blo t 5 antigen (rBlo t 5 Standard- Indoor Biotechnologies- USA) was added.

The standard curve was built in a working range between 0.098 ng mL-1 to 120 ng mL-1 for the allergen Blo t 5, evaluating the cross-reactivity with proteins present in the mite SP extract. After 18h of incubation with the standard antigen the plates were washed with 0.1 mol L-1 phosphate saline buffer. For the subsequent step, 100 μL of solution containing Biotinylated monoclonal antibody, anti Blo t 5 (Indoor Biotechnologies- USA), was added. After 1h of incubation the plate was washed again and 100 μL of ABST substrate (2,2-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic. Finally, the substrate reaction was stopped with 1% SDS solution (w/v). The readings were performed at 450 nm using a plate reader model dr-200bn from DIATEK.

Results and Discussion

The electrophoretic run shown in Figure 1 shows the constituent proteins profile for the crude extract of the Suidasia pontifica mite, with bands marked at approximately 14-16 kDa, 24-25 kDa and 60-70 kDa.

Figure 1: Electrophoresis gel 12% Acrylamide/Bis-acrylamide in denaturing conditions, for crude extract of the Suidasia pontifica mite for protein load between 2 μL and 15 μL. View Figure 1

The protein content obtained for the crude extract was 1.45 mg mL-1. The levels for the different percentages of proteins are shown in Figure 2A. One can observe that the protein extract fractionated with 80% (w/v) of ammonium sulfate, showed better separation of low molecular weight proteins, ~ 15 kDa (Figure 2B) with a maximum content of 13.62 mg mL-1 (Figure 2A). At the beginning of the fractionation, Figure 2B, in the percentage of 20-40% (w/v) there was a separation of proteins from larger ones (above 40 kDa), due to the smaller area of water solvation. As the ionic force increases, the tendency of smaller protein precipitation decreases, which can be observed in the electrophoresis gel (Figure 2B) in the fractions of 80 (w/v) and 100% (w/v). This can be justified, by the simple fact that smaller proteins have greater surfaces of solvation by the water, being necessary the increase of the concentration of the ions coming from the salt to capture water molecules that surround the proteins.

Figure 2: A) Protein content in mg mL-1 of the Suidasia pontifica mite extract obtained for each fractionation sequence by the method "salting out" at ~ 0 °C; B) Electrophoresis gel in denaturing conditions for the fractions collected from the SP extract during the fractionation process. View Figure 2

The immunoblotting for the protein fractions separated by electrophoresis, Figure 3, showed positive reactivity for allergenic proteins in the region of molecular mass between ~ 14-16 kDa. The spots obtained in the blot are a strong indication that in this region reactivity may be occurring between antigen (SP extract allergen protein) and antibody present in the serum pool. From this result, the reactivity was evaluated by ELISA.

Figure 3: Immunoblotting for serum pool of individuals allergic to Blomia tropicalis. Blo t: Blomia tropicalis - positive control; S.p: Suidasia pontifica; N.c: Negative control Bovine serum albumin - BSA. View Figure 3

These results were confirmed, considering that crude extract, without fractionation, analyzed by the ELISA method, presented an allergenic potency of 2.797 ngmL-1, which indicates cross-reactivity between Suidasia pontifica with the allergen Blo t 5 (14-15 kDa) of the Blomia tropicalis mite.

Further studies on the medium activation of cells (mast cells, basophils, etc.) to release histamine, should be investigated for better clarification in order to assess the allergenic potential of the mite antigens SP.

For all other obtained fractions in the different percentages of ammonium salt between 20 to 100% (w/v)) the allergenic potency with cross-reactivity to Blo t 5 showed concentrations below 1.93 ng mL-1.

In general, the results obtained show the efficiency of this separation technique by the fractionation method by "salting out", however, there is a limitation when low concentrations of the allergen (~ 14-16 kDa). The results indicate that the extract of the Suidasia pontifica mite, has a potential for desensitization in immunotherapy procedures, for atopic individuals with predisposition to allergies such as asthma, rhinitis. These results are in agreement with [9], which identified proteins present in the extract of the Suidasia medanensis mite when in contact with serum IgE from individuals allergic to it. Molecular weights ranged from 7.5 to 105 kDa. The authors report antigen reactivity to the protein bands at 30-31 kDa, 24.5 kDa, 21.47 kDa and 58 kDa, with other allergens (7.5; 14.5; 16; 27.5; 35.5; 41-42; 66; 75 and 105 kDa) were detected at lower frequencies and that by immunoblot inhibition it was possible to observe the ability of Blomia tropicalis extract to inhibit IgE binding of the serum pool to Suidasia medanensis.

Conclusion

The application of the "salting out" method is a viable alternative for the concentration of proteins from dust mite extracts. The starting crude extract can be optimized as to its extraction method so that the allergenic fractions, reactive to Blo t 5, can be obtained in the different percentages of saturation. It is also considered that the Suidasia pontifica mite presents specific cross-reactivity to the allergen Blo t 5, of the mite Blomia tropicalis. This suggests that "in vivo" immunotherapy procedures for Blomia tropicalis may be followed by decreased immunological reactivity for Suidasia pontifica in patients allergic to dust mites. However, these results will be much more clear when animal testing is performed.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to the report of allergenic extracts for the financial support.

We thank the biological sensor laboratory for technical support.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.

References

  1. Mondal Prit, Debarati Dey, Nimai Chandra Saha, Saibal Moitra, Saibal Moitra, et al. (2019) Investigation of house dust mite induced allergy using logistic regression in West Bengal, India. World Allergy Organization Journal 12: 1-9.
  2. Yuriev S, A Kurchenko, S Zubchenko, V Tsaryk, L DuBuske, et al. (2020) Diagnostic feature of house dust mite sensitization. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125: S17-S52.
  3. Thomas Wayne R, Belinda J Hales, Wendy Anne Smith (2010) House dust mite allergens in asthma and allergy. Trends in Molecular Medicine 16: 321-328.
  4. Ngu Mark Angelo V, Bergantin Jose H, Ramos JDA (2019) Development of a gold nanoparticle-labeled sandwich format lateral flow immunoassay kit for the detection of tropical house dust mite Suidasia pontifica. Protein Pept Lett 26: 357-363.
  5. Yu Ching Hsiang, Jaw Ji Tsai, Yi Hsueh Lin, Sheng Jie Yu, En Chih Liao (2020) Identification the cross-reactive or species-specific allergens of Tyrophagus putrescentiae and development molecular diagnostic kits for allergic diseases. Diagnostics.
  6. L Liu, Xiaoqing, Peiyan Zheng, Song Guo Zheng, Yingying Zhai, et al. (2019) Co-sensitization and cross-reactivity of Blomia tropicalis with two Dermatophagoides s pecies in guangzhou, China. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.
  7. Lahiani Sadjia, Marie Eve Dumez, Souad Khemili, Idir Bitam, Dimitri Gilis, et al. (2019) Cross-reactivity between major IgE epitopes of family 5 allergens from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 178: 10-18.
  8. Mihos, Francisca das Chagas Sobral Silva, Patricia Ribeiro Pereira, Anderson Bruno de Almeida Matos, Caio Velloso Mergh, et al. (2017) Study of protein profile and immunochemical reactivity for extracts of D . Farinae, D . Pteronyssinus and B. Tropicalis mites in the city of rio de janeiro, Brazil. Arquivos de Asma, Alergia e Imunologia 1: 379-386.
  9. Puerta L, Lagares A, Mercado D, Fernandez-Caldas E, Caraballo L (2005) Allergenic composition of the mite Suidasia medanensis and cross-reactivity with Blomia tropicalis. Allergy 60: 41-47.
  10. Lowry O, Rosebrough J, Lewis A, Randal R (1951) Medicion de proteinas con el reactivo de fenol Folin. J Biol Chem 193: 265-275.
  11. Gail Lorenz Miler (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar use. Anal Chem 31: 426-428.
  12. Scopes RK (1994) Protein purification: Principles and practice. Springer.
  13. Luczynska CM, Arruda LK, Platts-mills TAE, Lopez M, Chapman MD, et al. (1989) A two-site monoclonal antibody ELISA for the quantification of the major Dermatophagoides spp. allergens , Der p I and Der f I. Journal of Immunological Methods 118: 227-235.

Citation

Silva FCS, Silva DVR, Matos AB, Salgado AM, Queiroz M (2020) Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity of Suidasia pontifica with Allergens Blo t 5 from the Blomia tropicalis Mite. Int J Immunol Immunother 7:056. doi.org/10.23937/2378-3672/1410056