Citation

Kumar P, Kumar V, Kumar R, Sharma S, Thulkar S, et al. (2024) Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of High-Grade Gleason Score Distinguished from Low-Grade Gleason Score with Prostate Cancer in Blood Plasma using NMR Spectroscopy. Int J Pathol Clin Res 10:158. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5807/1510158

Research Article | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5807/1510158

Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of High-Grade Gleason Score Distinguished from Low-Grade Gleason Score with Prostate Cancer in Blood Plasma using NMR Spectroscopy

Pradeep Kumar1*, Virendra Kumar1, Rajeev Kumar2, Sanjay Sharma3, Sanjay Thulkar3 and M A Khan4

1Department of NMR & MRI Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

2Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

3Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

4Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Background: Separating low-grade from high-grade Gleason score (GS) prostate cancer (PCa) is an important clinical challenge for identifying patients eligible for active surveillance, thereby reducing the risk of overtreatment. PCa is one of the most prevalent cancers among men, characterized by varying degrees of aggressiveness. Despite recent progress in precisely determining some of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to cancer progression, more targeted and focused predictive techniques are still needed to differentiate between cancer stages. The present study demonstrates the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) based metabolic profiling of blood plasma for distinguishing between prostate cancer (PCa) patients having Gleason score GS < 7 from (GS) ≥ 7 coupled with machine learning or AI analysis.

Methodology: A total of 50 patients were included and Blood samples were in this study. 1H-NMR spectra of blood plasma samples were carried out at a 700 MHz spectrometer using 1D CPMG with pre-saturation. 2D COSY and TOCSY experiments were carried out for assignments of metabolite peaks. Blood plasma metabolite and clinical data analysis were carried out by machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) using Metabo Analyst 6.0.

Results: A total of 25 metabolites were identified in the blood plasma of patients. A significantly higher concentration of choline, phosphocreatine, lactate, and taurine while a lower concentration of histidine and tyrosine was observed in the blood plasma of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 as compared to GS < 7. Phosphocreatine, choline, and taurine showed the highest discrimination using PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, and random forest models. MSEA revealed significantly altered methylhistidine metabolism, beta-alanine metabolism, phospholipid biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, betaine metabolism, and methionine metabolism associated with high GS PCa progression.

Conclusion: This present study established that a selected panel of metabolites may accurately detect PCa in blood plasma samples. Our results suggest that metabolic profiling of blood plasma may provide biomarker/s for distinguishing PCa patients with various histological grades.

Keywords

Prostate cancer, Gleason score, Metabolomics, Non-invasive biomarker, Machine learning

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed solid-organ malignancy in men over the age of 50-years [1,2]. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the digital rectal examination (DRE) followed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy are used for diagnosis of PCa. PCa exhibits considerable heterogeneity in metabolic profiles, which the Gleason score (GS), a key prognostic indicator, can influence [3]. The Gleason score is calculated based on the patterns of cancer cell growth observed in biopsy samples. The score is a sum of the primary and secondary patterns, each graded on a scale from 1 to 5 [4,5]. Cancers are thought to progress from low grade to higher grade GS, leading to efforts to detect and eliminate low-grade disease to prevent morbidity and mortality from high-grade disease [6]. The grade of PCa is characterized by the GS) on a scale of 2-10, with 10 representing the most poorly differentiated tumors. Currently, there are no clinical tools that can accurately discriminate aggressive from indolent PCa. The Gleason scoring system is the most important prognostic tool in treatment planning, but it is dependent on subjective factors in the evaluation of aggressiveness and is limited by underestimation due to the under-sampling of biopsies [4]. New diagnostic and prognostic tools for evaluating PCa aggressiveness are therefore urgently needed. Metabolic alteration is an emerging hallmark of cancer and metabolic profiling of blood plasma using NMR can provide additional information about tumor behaviour, especially with the possibility of translating findings to potential biomarker/s [7,8]. PCa can be classified as low-grade GS or high-grade GS, it is depending on the degree by which prostate cancer cells histologically differ from normal cells, being high-grade PCa more aggressive and invasive than low-grade cancer [9]. We analyse how these metabolic differences can impact disease progression and treatment strategies, supported by current research findings. The overall aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of assessing PCa aggressiveness by NMR analysis of human blood plasma and urine and to identify specific metabolites as biomarker/s for tumor aggressiveness. Metabolic profiles and individual metabolite concentrations were used to discriminate between the histologically determined GS which was evaluated from blood samples. All these facts underline the urgent need for novel biomarker/s to improve clinical decision-making and management of PCa. However, there are limited studies that have reported the difference between high-grade GS and low-grade GS based on the difference in their metabolic profile [10-15].

Thus, the present study based on 1 H-NMR investigates the differences in metabolic profiling of blood plasma of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7 for determining biomarker/s of PCa coupled with machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) tools for better explaining and understanding metabolome of PCa.

Method

Clinical and pathological details of PCa patients

All participants were recruited in this study based on clinical diagnosis of lower tract urinary symptoms (LUTS) and elevated PSA level, and/or DRE, biopsy results, and Gleason score. Blood samples were collected from all the subjects and categorized based on biopsy and GS in the Department of Urology at AIIMS New Delhi, India. A total of 50 patients were recruited and blood samples were collected from patients in the morning pre-prandial after overnight fasting in a sodium heparin vacutainer before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Blood samples were collected from PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 (GS 7 to 10) (n = 35 mean age: 67.2 ± 7.6 years), PSA: 228.28 (6.20-1796.10) ng/mL, and GS < 7 (GS 3 + 3 = 6) (n = 15, mean age: 68.7 ± 7.0 years), PSA: 16.97 (4.11-61) ng/mL. Informed consent was taken and Institute Ethics Committee approved the study.

Sample collection and processing

The samples were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant (blood plasma) was aliquot into 2 mL sterile vials and immediately stored at -80 °C until NMR analysis. Then 400 µL D2O was added to 200 µL of blood plasma sample with 0.5 mM sodium format and 0.5 mM sodium trimethyl-silyl- [ 2, 2, 3, 3- H4]-propionate (TSP). The total 600 µL volume of the sample was transferred into a 5 mm NMR sample tube. Hence format was used as a concentration standard at 8.46 ppm for quantification of metabolites.

1D and 2D proton NMR Spectroscopy

All proton (1H) NMR spectra were acquired from a 700 MHz spectrometer operating at 699.94 MHz at 25 °C. The one-dimensional (1D) spectrum was acquired using the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) pulse sequence with a pre-saturation pulse for water peak suppression. The typical parameters for 1 H-NMR experiments were: number of scans = 64; data points = 32K; spectral width = 9124.1 Hz; a total spin echo delay of 16 ms and a repetition time (TR) of 70 s.

The parameters used for TOCSY experiments were: data points 2K in F2 dimension; spectral width 9800 Hz; with a relaxation delay of 2.5 s. The number of t1 increments was 400 with 16 scans and a mixing time of 80 ms.

NMR data processing

The 1 H-NMR spectra were processed on a Dell 39N, PC, Red Hat Enterprise Linux workstation using the Varian software, Vnmrj 2.3A. The free induction decays (FID) were zero-filled to 64 K and an exponential weighting function corresponding to 0.3 Hz line broadening was applied before the Fourier transformation (FT) for blood plasma samples. The 2D NMR spectrum data was processed using automated processing with the data size of (2K × 2K) with Gaussian weighting function in both F2/F1 dimensions.

Quantitation of blood metabolites

The metabolite concentrations (mM) were determined using Chenomx NMR Suite 7.5 software (Chenomx Inc. Edmonton, Canada). The concentration (Targeted) of only those metabolites that showed well-resolved resonance in the proton 1D (CPMG) NMR spectra of blood plasma samples of all patients.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using machine learning tools or AI software SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) and MetaboAnalyst6.0 web server (www.metaboanalyst.ac). For, the comparison between the two groups study was analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test. In all statistical analyses value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statically significant. Further analysis, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis) multivariate partial least squares discriminatory analysis (PLS-DA), orthogonal PLS-DA variable importance in projection (VIP) score, and discriminant function analysis were carried out. The robustness and validation of the model of tenfold internal cross-validation (ICV) were applied, from which R2Y (goodness of fit parameter) and Q2 (predictive ability parameter, estimated by cross-validation) were calculated. Finally, these OPLS-DA models were validated by random permutation analysis (n = 100). Variables with VIP score > 1.0 were selected as significant metabolites that can differentiate patients with PCa from low-grade GS of blood plasma samples. The variable selection algorithms in PLS-DA, OPLSDA, and random forest analysis were for diagnostic performance. Metabolites panel consisting of metabolites common in four selection algorithms so-called overlapping set (OL). Hierarchical clustering heatmap of blood plasma metabolome data. Each column shows the metabolic pattern of individual PCa patients having PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7 group. Pathway analysis using Metabolic Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was carried out.

Result

Figure 1 shows the representative aliphatic region of 1D 1 H NMR spectrum of the blood plasma sample of a PCa patient having ≥ 7 (4 + 4) ( A ) and GS < 7 (3 + 3) (B). In all, 25 metabolites were assigned using 1D and 2D NMR. For the concentration, [mM median (range)] of 6 metabolites that showed significant (p < 0.05) differences, AUC values, and VIP score (> 1) between PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7, are presented in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the PLS-DA and OPLDSA score plots, VIP plot, and predicted model showing discrimination of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 from GS < 7. Table 2 shows the identified metabolites in blood plasma samples of PCa patients using NMR spectroscopy and their chemical shift (ppm) positions of resonances 1 H of metabolites. Furthermore, the code (identifiers) of the metabolites of data sets was searched in different metabolites Databases (KEGGID and HMDB) are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1: Representative one-dimensional (1D) aliphatic region of 1H NMR (700 MHz) spectrum of blood plasma of a PCa patient with GS ≥ 7(A) and GS < 7(B). View Figure 1

Figure 2: A and B) PLS-DA scores OPLS-DA plot showed clear discriminate patients with GS ≥ 7 (red) and GS < 7 (green); C) Variable in projection (VIP) scores of metabolite profile in blood plasma in two study groups; D) VIP scores for 15 metabolites with the highest contribution to the separation of the present study groups and Validation of OPL-DA by permutation test performed with 100 random permutations and models showing Q2 = 0.412 and R2Y = 0.704 values from permuted analysis (n = 100). View Figure 2

Table 1: The concentration of metabolites (mM) in blood plasma samples of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7. AUC values were obtained in univariate ROC curve analyses and VIP scores. View Table 1

Table 2: List of identified metabolites in blood plasma samples of PCa patients using NMR spectroscopy and their chemical shift (ppm) positions of resonances 1H of metabolites. Code (identifiers) of the metabolites of data sets was searched in different metabolites Databases (KEGGID and HMDB). View Table 2

The blood plasma sample of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 showed a significantly higher concentration of choline, phosphocreatine, lactate, and taurine than PCa patients with GS < 7 while lower concentrations of tyrosine and histidine are given in Table 1.

The results obtained from PLS-DA OPLS-DA of metabolites concentration in blood plasma showed a separation between patients with GS ≥ 7 and SG < 7. PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 from patients with GS < 7 were discriminated with R2Y = 0.704, Q2 = 0.412, and with an accuracy of 0.78 were shown in Figure 2. The significant metabolites in blood plasma such as choline, phosphocreatine, lactate, taurine, tyrosine, and histidine showed high VIP scores (> 1.0) in GS ≥ 7 compared to GS < 7 patients are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2C. The model obtained for blood plasma profiling was validated with permutation analysis (n = 100) and with observed statistic results at p < 0.01. Further, these metabolites were used for univariate ROC curve analysis. The AUC for ROC curve analysis calculated at optimal cutoffs for the significant metabolites are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 3A shows a hierarchical clustering heat map of blood plasma metabolome data. Each column shows the metabolic pattern of individual PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7. The univariate ROC curves analysis for AUC for phosphocreatine and histidine are displayed in Figure 3B and Figure 3C, respectively.

Figure 3: Hierarchical clustering heat map of blood plasma metabolome data. Each column shows the metabolic pattern of individual PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7 (A). The univariate ROC curves analysis for AUC for phosphocreatine (B) and histidine (C). View Figure 3

The results indicated that 5 metabolites with a high AUC above 0.65 were choline, phosphocreatine, lactate, tyrosine, and histidine respectively whereas AUC for taurine such as were AUC less than 0.65. Histidine showed the highest AUC value (0.80) followed by phosphocreatine and choline (0.76 and 0.75 respectively) (Table 1). Thus, the distinctive signature with the 5 metabolites achieved the highest AUC value and significantly increased the diagnosis performance of PCa patients having high-grade GS and low-grade GS. The choline, phosphocreatine, lactate, tyrosine, and histidine showed discriminate performance using PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, and random forest models are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Feature selected and identified metabolites in blood plasma samples of high and low-grade Gleason PCa using different multivariate models. View Table 3

Metabolic pathway analysis is essential for the understanding of cellular processes of specific diseases, providing insight into the development of treatment methods. The Pathway analysis integrates blood plasma metabolite set enrichment analysis to extract biologically meaningful information from the data given in Figure 4. According to the metabolic pathway analysis based exploratory analysis by using the relative concentrations of differential significant potential blood plasma metabolites, we found abnormal pathways and potential biomarkers involved with the patients with GS ≥ 7 and GS < 7. Table 4 shows that pathway analysis results showed the unique significantly altered targeted biochemical pathways seen were: Methylhistidine metabolism, beta-alanine metabolism, phospholipid biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, betaine metabolism, and methionine metabolism associated with PCa aggressiveness.

Figure 4: Metabolic Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) showing the altered significant metabolites revealed in the blood plasma of PCa patients. Metabolic Pathway Analysis (MetPA) shows the most altered potential significant metabolic pathways involved in PCa progression. View Figure 4

Table 4: Results from the blood plasma metabolites associated with dominated altered metabolic pathway analysis of PCa patients using Metabolic Pathway Analysis (MetPA). View Table 4

Discussion

In this study, targeted approaches that map dysregulated metabolic pathways may be extremely important for understanding the processes behind cancer and aggressiveness. The Gleason score, derived from the histopathological evaluation of prostate biopsy samples, is crucial for determining the cancer's aggressiveness and guiding treatment decisions. The score ranges from 6 to 10, with higher scores indicating more aggressive and less differentiated cancer. The present study demonstrates the proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) based metabolic profiling of blood plasma for distinguishing between prostate cancer (PCa) patients having Gleason score GS < 7 from (GS) ≥ 7.

This study explores the metabolic differences in blood plasma between PCa patients with Gleason scores less than 7 and those with scores of 7 or higher GS. Our data revealed significantly lower concentrations of histidine and tyrosine in the blood plasma of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 compared to GS < 7. While higher concertation of phosphocreatine, choline, lactate, and taurine were found in patients with ≥ 7 as compared to patients with GS < 7.

Higher concentrations of Lac are seen in the blood plasma of patients with ≥ 7 as compared to patients with GS < 7 which is associated with an increase in glycolytic flux as well as the Cori cycle or Lac cycle, and high Lac concentrations have been associated with more aggressive diseases and metastasis [16,17]. Since Lac is the endpoint product of glycolysis, its accumulation implied an increased anaerobic glycolysis. Additionally, the Warburg effect describes that cancer cells have increased anaerobic glycolysis and therefore may lead to the accumulation of Lac in the blood plasma of PCa progression [16,17].

The energy metabolite phosphocreatine was also observed to be high in the blood plasma of high-grade GS. Creatine and its phosphorylated form are well recognized as key intermediates in energy metabolism and elevated creatine is associated with high energy demand for rapid proliferation of cancer cells [18,19]. Creatine is mainly synthesized in the liver and kidney and stored in muscle as phosphocreatine. Phosphocreatine has a direct function in cellular energy transport. Creatinine is a nonenzymatic product of creatine and phosphocreatine, and the creatine-phosphocreatine system plays a crucial role in cellular energy transportation, especially in cells with altered energy metabolism [18,19].

The present study revealed a significantly higher concentration of choline in the blood plasma of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 as compared to GS < 7. Choline is associated with the breakdown of membrane phospholipids during the malignant transformation of prostatic epithelial cells [20,21].

Our results showed significantly higher concentrations of taurine in the blood plasma of PCa patients with GS ≥ 7 compared to GS < 7. Taurine can regulate the signal pathways for cell proliferation and protein synthesis through AKT/FOXO1, JAK2/STAT3, PI3K/AKT, and mTOR/AMPK. Taurine is primarily engaged in the taurine and hypo-taurine metabolism pathway. Elevated taurine concentrations have been seen in the reactive stroma, which may indicate an inflammatory reaction [22,23]. On the other hand, we also observed a positive link between taurine levels and age, which would require further investigation in studies that are expressly intended for that purpose. Our data also showed a significantly lower concentration of tyrosine in the blood plasma of the patients with GS ≥ 7 compared to GS < 7 which might be attributed to the high protein turnover seen in PCa aggressiveness [24].

The proteinogenic amino acid histidine was also lower in patients with PCa compared to low GS. The histidine is related to changes in anti-inflammatory responses and anti-oxidative stress and also may be related to protein energy wasting [25]. It is considered to have antioxidant properties such as scavenging singlet oxygen and free radicals. The histidine also provides intracellular buffering to stimulate anaerobic energy formation. The lower concentration may reflect the increased use of the carbon skeleton of this amino acid for the biosynthesis of cellular molecules needed for the rapid proliferation of malignant cells [24,26].

NMR based on metabolic profiling of blood plasma samples this study shows that low and high-grade GS PCa can be distinguished by the concentrations of phosphocreatine, choline, histidine, taurine, lactate, and tyrosine. In the future, by analyzing larger patient cohorts, concentration cut-off values can be determined based on the metabolic profiles and can become tools for assessing PCa aggressiveness. 1 H-NMR is feasible as a diagnostic supplementary tool for evaluating TRUS-guided prostate biopsies, providing metabolic profiles that can predict tumor aggressiveness. Thus, our results demonstrate the value of NMR in distinguishing and monitoring the follow-up of patients included in active surveillance programs.

Conclusion

This present study established that a selected panel of metabolites may accurately detect PCa in blood plasma samples. The significant difference in metabolite concentration of phosphocreatine, histidine, choline, lactate tyrosine, and taurine may be used as a measure to discriminate between PCa patients having GS ≥ 7 and < 7. Our findings indicate that metabolite alterations are associated with the tumor grade and progression of the disease. We believe that metabolite biomarker/s as presented herein could have future clinical utility for the diagnosis and monitoring of PCa if they can discriminate against low-grade-cancer patients. Based on these results further work is acceptable to validate these findings in a much larger cohort.

Author Contributions

Pradeep Kumar, Virendra Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, Sanjay Sharma, Sanjay Thulkar, MA Khan. Pradeep Kumar was patient data collection, NMR data acquired, analyzed, and wrote the manuscript draft. Pradeep Kumar, Virendra Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, Sanjay Sharma, Sanjay Thulkar, and MA Khan contributed to the discussion, manuscript draft reviewed the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding Information

This manuscript is not funded.

Acknowledgment

The NMR facilities (700 MHz NMR spectrometers) provided by the Department of NMR, AIIMS, New Delhi are greatly acknowledged and appreciated.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A (2024) Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 74: 12-49.
  2. Prensner JR, Rubin MA, Wei JT, Chinnaiyan AM (2012) Beyond PSA: The next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers. Sci Transl Med 4: 127rv3.
  3. Descotes JL (2019) Diagnosis of prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 6: 129-136.
  4. Epstein JI (2010) An update of the Gleason grading system. J Urol 183: 433-440.
  5. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Committee IG (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29: 1228-1242.
  6. Giskeødegård GF, Bertilsson H, Selnæs KM, Wright AJ, Bathen TF, et al. (2013) Spermine and citrate as metabolic biomarkers for assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness. PLoS One 8: e62375.
  7. Gómez Cebrián N, Poveda JL, Pineda Lucena A, Puchades Carrasco L (2022) Metabolic phenotyping in prostate cancer using multi-omics approaches. Cancers (Basel) 14: 596.
  8. Fei X, Du X, Wang J, Liu J, Gong Y, et al. (2024) Precise diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer by comprehensive serum metabolic fingerprints: A prediction model study. Int J Surg 110: 1450-1462.
  9. Keshari K, Tsachres H, Iman R, Delos Santos L, Tabatabai Z, et al. (2011) Correlation of phospholipid metabolites with prostate cancer pathologic grade, proliferative status and surgical stage-impact of tissue environment. NMR Biomed 24: 691-699.
  10. Kumar D, Gupta A, Mandhani A, Sankhwar SN (2015) Metabolomics derived prostate cancer biomarkers: Fact or fiction? J Proteome Res 14: 1455-1464.
  11. Meller S, Meyer HA, Bethan B, Dietrich D, Maldonado SG, et al. (2016) Integration of tissue metabolomics, transcriptomics and immunohistochemistry reveals ERG- and gleason score-specific metabolomic alterations in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 7: 1421-1438.
  12. Penney KL, Tyekucheva S, Rosenthal J, El Fandy H, Carelli R, et al. (2021) Metabolomics of prostate cancer gleason score in tumor tissue and serum. Mol Cancer Res 19: 475-484.
  13. Karkin PA, Brito A, Moskaleva N, Lartsova EV, Shpot YV, et al. (2020) Plasma metabolomic profile in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer and associations with the prostate-specific antigen and the Gleason score. Metabolomics 16: 74.
  14. Zheng H, Dong B, Ning J, Shao X, Zhao L, et al. (2020) NMR-based metabolomics analysis identifies discriminatory metabolic disturbances in tissue and biofluid samples for progressive prostate cancer. Clin Chim Acta 501: 241-251.
  15. Zhang X, Xia B, Zheng H, Ning J, Zhu Y, et al. (2022) Identification of characteristic metabolic panels for different stages of prostate cancer by 1H NMR-based metabolomics analysis. J Transl Med 20: 275.
  16. Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Zierhut ML, et al. (2008) Hyperpolarized 13C lactate, pyruvate, and alanine: Noninvasive biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and grading. Cancer Res 68: 8607-8615.
  17. Yang B, Zhang C, Cheng S, Li G, Griebel J, et al. (2021) Novel metabolic signatures of prostate cancer revealed by 1H-NMR metabolomics of urine. Diagnostics (Basel) 11: 149.
  18. Kumar D, Gupta A, Mandhani A, Sankhwar SN (2016) NMR spectroscopy of filtered serum of prostate cancer: A new frontier in metabolomics. Prostate 76: 1106-1119.
  19. Wyss M, Kaddurah Daouk R (2000) Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 80: 1107-1213.
  20. Giskeødegård GF, Hansen AF, Bertilsson H, Gonzalez SV, Kristiansen KA, et al. (2015) Metabolic markers in blood can separate prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Cancer 113: 1712-1719.
  21. Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM (2011) Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 835-848.
  22. Huang J, Weinstein SJ, Moore SC, Derkach A, Hua X, et al.(2019) Pre-diagnostic serum metabolomic profiling of prostate cancer survival. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 74: 853-859.
  23. Andersen MK, Rise K, Giskeødegård GF, Richardsen E, Bertilsson H, et al. (2018) Integrative metabolic and transcriptomic profiling of prostate cancer tissue containing reactive stroma. Sci Rep 8: 14269.
  24. Derezinski P, Klupczynska A, Sawicki W, Palka JA, Kokot ZJ (2017) Amino acid profiles of serum and urine in search for prostate cancer biomarkers: A pilot study. Int J Med Sci 14: 1-12.
  25. Bi X, Henry C (2017) Plasma-free amino acid profiles are predictors of cancer and diabetes development. Nutr Diabetes 7: e249.
  26. Watanabe M, Suliman ME, Qureshi AR, Garcia Lopez E, Bárány P, et al. (2008) Consequences of low plasma histidine in chronic kidney disease patients: Associations with inflammation, oxidative stress, and mortality. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 1860-1866.

Citation

Kumar P, Kumar V, Kumar R, Sharma S, Thulkar S, et al. (2024) Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of High-Grade Gleason Score Distinguished from Low-Grade Gleason Score with Prostate Cancer in Blood Plasma using NMR Spectroscopy. Int J Pathol Clin Res 10:158. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5807/1510158