Citation

Feiler MO, Yucel R, Liu Z, Caserta M, Lawrence BP, et al. (2023) Trends and Non-Clinical Predictors of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza Diagnosis in an Urban Pediatric Population. Int J Pediatr Res 9:112. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5769/1510112

Original Manuscript | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5769/1510112

Trends and Non-Clinical Predictors of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza Diagnosis in an Urban Pediatric Population

Marina Oktapodas Feiler, PhD, MS1,2,3*, Recai Yucel, PhD1, Zhiqing Liu1, Mary Caserta, MD4, B. Paige Lawrence, PhD2, Carter H Pason1, Dwight J Hardy, PhD5, Kelly Thevenet-Morrison, MS3, Ann Dozier, PhD, MS3 and Todd A Jusko, PhD, MS2,3,4

1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, USA

2Department of Environmental Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, USA

3Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, USA

4Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, USA

5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, USA

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the demographic, maternal, and community-level predictors of pediatric respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza diagnosis among an urban population of children residing in Rochester, NY.

Study design

A test-negative case-control design was used to investigate various non-clinical determinants of RSV and influenza diagnosis among 1,808 children aged 0-14 years who presented to the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) or an affiliated health clinic in Rochester, NY between 2012-2019. These children were all tested for RSV and influenza via polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) method, including RSV and influenza diagnosis of all severity types. Test results were linked to medical records, birth certificates, questionnaires administered through the Statewide Perinatal Data System, and the US census by census tracts to obtain information on child, maternal, demographic, and socio-economic characteristics.

Results

Overall the strongest predictor of RSV and influenza diagnosis was child's age, with every year increase in child's age, risk for RSV decreased (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.79) and risk for influenza increased (OR: 1.20; 95%: 1.16, 1.24). In addition to age, non-private insurance type was positively associated with influenza diagnosis. When considering the proportion of positive cases for RSV and influenza over all PCR tests by respiratory season, a spike in influenza cases was observed in 2018-2019.

Conclusions

Age was a strong predictor of RSV and influenza diagnosis among this urban sample of children.

Keywords

RSV, Flu, Determinants, Risk factors, Predictors

Introduction

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza are common viral respiratory infections among children. It is estimated that among children under 5 years of age, RSV accounts for 58,000 hospitalizations in the United States and 100-300 deaths, annually [1,2]. RSV is the leading cause of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in children under the age of 1 year in the United States [3]. Approximately 70% of children will have a RSV infection in their first year of life, and of those 50% will have a recurrence in their second year of life [4]. Influenza virus causes annual epidemics and leads to 6,000-26,000 annual influenza-associated hospitalizations among children under 5 years of age, and 600,000-2,500,000 outpatient visits [5]. The influenza virus is vaccine preventable, with annual vaccines needed due to annual differences in circulating strains. Among children, influenza vaccine effectiveness is between 20-60% depending on age, vaccination type, and circulating influenza virus [6].

All pediatric populations are at an increased risk of RSV and influenza infections compared with adults given their naïve immune systems. There is limited literature reporting child, maternal, demographic, and socio-economic predictors of these infections. Most studies have focused on child age, race, ethnicity, day-care attendance, number of siblings in the home, and clinical predictors [7-11]. Preterm birth, low birthweight, maternal smoking, family history of atopy, lack of breastfeeding, and living in an overcrowded household (household with > 7 members) are additional risk factors that have been significantly associated with severe RSV infection among children under five years of age [12]. RSV hospitalizations have been associated with younger child age (< 6 months), male sex, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, having siblings, and daycare attendance [7-9]. The epidemiologic literature investigating predictors of RSV and influenza diagnoses are heavily targeted to children with severe disease, such as hospitalized children. There is limited evidence on predictors of RSV diagnosis, at all severity levels, despite 2.1 million annual outpatient (non-hospitalization) visits for RSV among children under the age of five [13].

Given the gaps in the literature, a test-negative case-control study was designed to investigate trends of RSV and influenza diagnosis of all severities over 7 respiratory seasons, and a variety of predictors for RSV and influenza diagnosis among an urban sample of children 14 years of age and younger. Our objective was to evaluate child characteristics, maternal characteristics, demographic, and community-level socio-economic (SES) factors as potential determinants of RSV and influenza diagnosis of all severity types.

Methods

A test-negative case-control study was conducted among children, ≤ 14 years of age, who were tested for RSV and influenza via molecular diagnostic method at URMC, Rochester, NY between October 1, 2012 and May 31, 2019 [14]. This is the gold-standard study design for observational studies to assess infection risk and vaccine effectiveness due to the underlying assumption of equal risk of pathogen exposure among these children [15,16]. We only included RSV and influenza tests performed between October 1st and May 31st, in each year to further enhance the underlying assumption of the test-negative study design that both cases and controls have equal risk of pathogen exposure [15]. The typical respiratory season is between October and May when RSV, influenza, and other respiratory viruses circulate more readily, and community exposure is more common. The study was approved by the internal Research Subjects Review Board (RSRB) at URMC (RSRB # 0070915). Informed consent was waived as this was a retrospective, secondary data analysis of existing medical records.

Children clinically tested via real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) method at the URMC clinical microbiology laboratory were categorized into cases (positive) and controls (negative) based on their test results [14]. Nasopharyngeal swabs were performed on children with suspected respiratory infection based on symptoms, timing of high exposure season, and clinical judgement. For children with multiple respiratory tests and positive results, only the initial positive respiratory test was considered as a case. Children who served as a case and tested negative at a different point from 2012-2019 could also serve as a control. PCR method testing included a panel for influenza A and B, and RSV infection, and a second full respiratory panel include influenza A and B, RSV, and an additional seven respiratory viruses [14]. The URMC laboratory is Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-permitted by the New York State Department of Health, and accredited by the College of American Pathologists to perform PCR method testing for influenza and RSV [14]. Internal quality assurance programs and standard operating procedures have been previously described [14]. From the laboratory, test result, date of testing, and medical record number was obtained.

Data extraction from medical records was done using the Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) system, a clinical data query tool at URMC used to elicit medical record data. Data collected from medical records included child's date of birth, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, address, and zip code. For a subset of children born at Strong Memorial Hospital (SMH) (affiliated with URMC), laboratory and medical records were linked to the Statewide Perinatal Data System (SPDS). SPDS collects information from birth certificates and supplemental questionnaires at nine birthing hospitals in the nine-county Finger Lakes Region since 1998. From SPDS, maternal age, parity, breastfeeding status at delivery, maternal smoking before and during pregnancy, and birthweight were collected. Additional socio-economic variables were obtained by using geographic information system (GIS) and spatial modeling techniques using the ArcGIS software (version 9.2). Children's addresses at time of PCR test were mapped and geocoded to assess their census tract by using census mapping. These census tracts were then linked to the US census 2010, these census data will be most representatives of socio-economic factors of interest from 2012-2019. Socio-economic (SES) variables included college education (less than bachelor's degree obtained), living below poverty status, and unemployment. These variables were dichotomized by finding the median proportion of each variable in every census tract included in the study (N = 190), and individuals were coded whether they resided in a census tract where their specific SES variable status was above or below the median proportion for their specific tract.

The full list of predictors considered in the present analysis included child's age at testing (measured by using date of birth and PCR testing date), sex, race (White, Black, other), ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic), insurance status (private, public, self-pay), respiratory season of testing (2012-2019), birthweight (grams), maternal age, parity, breastfeeding status during delivery hospitalization (breast milk only, formula only, both breast milk and formula, or other), perinatal smoking (smoking status within 3 months of pregnancy and/or during pregnancy), and community-level unemployment, education, and poverty status. Analyses were performed among children with complete information on all predictors of interest (N = 1,808).

Bivariate analyses examined the crude association between RSV and influenza and all predictors individually using logistic regression to describe the differences between cases and controls among this study sample. Proportions of positive influenza and RSV tests over all PCR tests were examined per age group and respiratory season. Multiple logistic regression models were fit to include all potential predictors for influenza and RSV separately, estimating the adjusted risk of RSV and influenza while considering all other predictors by reporting adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence limits. Stepwise regression models were used to understand the most important contributors to the risk of RSV and influenza diagnosis. P < 0.010 criterion was used for inclusion into the models. All data analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.).

We conducted multiple imputations [17] to improve efficiency of the utilization of the data while addressing the uncertainty due to missing data. SAS PROC MI using a sequential regression imputation (SRMI option) was used [18]. Missing data stemmed from the linkage of medical records to SPDS and geo-mapping and US Census linkage. Children included in the study with data from SPDS must have been born at SMH, which to a reduction in our sample with complete information. Additionally, some children could not be mapped within Monroe County in Rochester, NY as they were traveling outside the Rochester region or did not have appropriate addresses (P.O. boxes, misspellings which could not be matched to a known address).

Influenza is a vaccine-preventable disease, considering vaccination as a predictor of influenza diagnosis is ideal. After data extraction and review of the medical records, vaccination status was not recorded consistently. Some children were given a date of vaccination, others had no information. Given the provided data, we were unable to identify whether a child had received a vaccination but was not reported or had not received a vaccination. Among children who had a vaccination reported, an adjusted logistic regression model was fit considering all the potential predictors for influenza.

Results

Our study sample consisted of 1,808 children between 0 and 14 years of age, with 432 children testing positive for RSV, and 296 children testing positive for influenza. This includes all children tested for RSV and influenza via PCR between October 1-May 31 from 2012 to 2019 at URMC. The study sample reported children who self-identified (by parent/guardian) as 51% White, 36% Black, and 13% other race, and 12% reporting Hispanic ethnicity. When considering bivariate analyses for all predictor variables and RSV and influenza diagnosis, most predictors were positively associated with RSV and influenza, although these results are imprecise and not statistically significant. Compared with controls, RSV cases were younger, non-typical birthweight, male, non-white, not exclusively breastfed at delivery, and had mothers who were multiparous, who smoked before and/or during pregnancy, and resided in an area with a high proportion of less than college education. Compared with controls, influenza cases were older, typical birthweight, non-white race, Hispanic, non-private insurance type, and had younger, multiparous mothers who smoked before and/or during pregnancy.

Median (IQR) age of RSV cases was 1.05 (0.42, 2.06) years, cases ranged from 0.04 years (2-weeks-old) to 11.4 years. For every year increase in age, children had a 15% decreased risk of RSV diagnosis (Table 1), with children under 6 months of age having > 150% increased risk for RSV, 95% CI: 8.61, 27.05 (Table 1). Median (IQR) age for influenza cases was 5.15 (2.22, 7.94) years, cases ranged from 0.12 years (1.5 months) to 14.97 years. In contrast with RSV, for every year increase in age, there was a 20% increased risk for influenza diagnosis, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.24 (Table 1). The proportion of positive RSV tests over all viral PCR tests done in this sample decreased with increasing age (Figure 1). The proportion of positive influenza tests increased with increasing age (Figure 1). When examining the proportion of positive RSV and influenza tests per respiratory season, the 2018-2019 seasons demonstrated the highest proportion of influenza diagnosis and the 2013-2014 seasons demonstrated the highest proportion of RSV diagnosis (Figure 2).

Figure 1: The proportion of positive RSV and influenza PCR tests within each group (N = 1808). View Figure 1

Figure 2: The proportion of positive RSV and influenza PCR tests among all PCR tests per respiratory season, from 2012-2019 (N = 1808). View Figure 2

Table 1: Descriptive associations between demographic, maternal, community-level characteristics and RSV and influenza diagnosis (N = 1808). View Table 1

The adjusted multivariable logistic regression model examining risk of RSV diagnosis, observed child's age to be a strong, statistically significant predictor (Table 2). Given RSV disease is very common in young children, as expected lower child age was associated with an increased risk of RSV diagnosis. After controlling for all other predictors, children younger than 6 months of age had a 14% increased odds of RSV diagnosis compared with children five years of age and older, 14.14 (7.89, 25.56) (Table 2). Birthweight was observed to increase the risk of RSV diagnosis if it was out the typical range of 2,500-4,000 grams. Observed odds ratio for those with a low birthweight (< 2,500 grams) was 1.14 (0.85, 1.52), and for those with a high birthweight (≥ 4,000 grams) was 1.25 (0.79, 1.97) (Table 2). Non-white race increased the risk of RSV diagnosis, children with black race had 12% greater odds of RSV compared with white children (95% CI: 0.81, 1.56) (Table 2). These child characteristics were imprecise. Maternal characteristics were also not statistically significant, but regression results observed children with mothers < 20 years of age at delivery (OR: 1.15), multiparous mothers (OR: 1.20-1.27), and mothers who smoked (OR: 1.34) to have an increased the risk of RSV diagnosis (Table 2).

Table 2: The association between various demographic, maternal, and community- level predictors and RSV and influenza diagnosis (N = 1,808). View Table 2

Community-level characteristics also rendered imprecise results, with children residing in a census tract with a high proportion of less than college education to have an 11% increased risk of RSV diagnosis (95% CI: 0.87, 1.42) (Table 2).

Our multivariable regression estimates also revealed that higher children's age and private insurance were statistically significant protective factors for influenza diagnosis (Table 2). Younger children were at a decreased risk of influenza diagnosis. Compared with children aged 5 and older, children under 6 months of age had 90% reduced odds of influenza (95% CI: 0.06, 0.17). Children with public or self-pay insurance type had an increased risk for influenza diagnosis compared with children who had private insurance type. Those with self-pay had 2.12 times the odds of influenza diagnosis compared to those with private insurance (95% CI: 1.13, 4.00). Although estimates of all other predictors were imprecise, increased odds of influenza diagnosis was seen for children with high birthweight, of non-White race, with younger mothers (< 20 years), and with multiparous mothers (Table 2).

Stepwise regression analyses considered all potential predictors for RSV and influenza. When considering RSV, age (p < 0.0001), respiratory season (p = 0.0057), and maternal perinatal smoking (p = 0.0936) were included in the final model. When considering influenza, age (p < 0.0001), respiratory season (p < 0.0001), insurance (p = 0.0049), and infant feeding type (p = 0.0090) were included in the final model.

Results of multiple imputation analyses were more precise but overall risk estimates were similar and did not impact interpretations of the findings (results not shown). Sensitivity analyses examining the predictors of influenza diagnosis among vaccinated children rendered similar results to the main analysis. A total of 266 children had a vaccination reported in their medical records, among them 43 (16%) children had a positive test and 223 had a negative test (Table 2). Higher children's age remained a protective factor for influenza diagnosis (Table 2). Although imprecise, high birthweight, non-white race, and having multiparous mothers remained positively associated with risk of influenza diagnosis (Table 3). The main differences between the sensitivity analysis and the main analysis for influenza were with sex, mothers' age, and insurance type. Having young mothers and non-private insurance no longer increased the risk for influenza diagnosis but results were not statistically significant. An imprecise inverse association was observed for female sex and influenza diagnosis, OR: 95% CI: 0.61 (0.31, 1.92). Overall, results of influenza risk among vaccinated children were comparable with the full sample.

Table 3: The association between child, maternal, community-level characteristics, and influenza diagnosis among vaccinated children (N = 266). View Table 3

Discussion

In the present work, age was the most influential predictor for RSV and influenza diagnosis. After consideration of all other predictors, children aged 0.5-1 year of age had the highest risk of RSV diagnosis, compared with children five years of age or older. RSV is common among young children in the US, up to 70% of children acquiring infection in their first year of life [4]. The present study was able to observe consistent results among children with a RSV diagnosis of all severity types, as opposed to focusing on children who are hospitalized with severe RSV disease. The average age of children who tested positive for influenza was 5.15 years. This is consistent with national estimates demonstrating influenza infection is greatest among children aged 5-14 years of age while, influenza-related complications, hospitalization, and mortality are greatest among children < 5 years of age [19].

In addition to age, insurance status was positively associated with influenza diagnosis. This was also confirmed in the stepwise regression model (p = 0.0049). A study of children with H1N1 influenza infection in Texas during the 2009 influenza pandemic observed that children with public or no insurance were less likely than those with private insurance to be hospitalized (p < 0.01) [20]. However, among non-hospitalized children, there was a doubling in the number of cases in influenza among those with public insurance as compared with private insurance [20]. A surveillance study of influenza from 2009-2013 observed individuals with no insurance to have 3.8 times the risk of influenza diagnosis compared to those with public insurance (95% CI: 1.4, 10.4) [21].

In the present study, all other associations were imprecise although some predictors showed relatively high positive associations with RSV and influenza, including race, birthweight, maternal age, parity, and maternal smoking. Previous studies that have considered similar predictors for RSV-associated hospitalizations have observed that age, race, and insurance are important determinants of RSV hospitalization [1]. In addition, associations with comorbid conditions indicative of prematurity and low birthweight have been observed [1,22-25]. After adjustment for gestational age, a study among children born in Ontario between 2012-2018 found that children < 2000 g at birth had a 57% increased risk of RSV-associated hospitalization compared with children of typical birthweight (95% CI: 1.24, 1.99) [24]. Similarly, in the present study we observed children with low birthweight (< 2500 grams) to have a 14% increased risk of RSV diagnosis compared to those of typical birthweight, although results were imprecise. Epidemiologic evidence has observed low birthweight to be associated with shorter telomere length, lower CD3 concentrations, and elevated C-reactive protein concentrations among preschool children, suggesting reduced immunocompetence and potential vulnerability to infections in childhood [26].

In the present study, there was an observed spike in positive influenza tests during the 2018-2019 seasons (Figure 2). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this season did not exhibit an exceptionally high burden for this age group and so this observed trend is not consistent with that of the US population during this time [27]. Given RSV did not show the same trend, this may be related to influenza testing guidelines leading to increases in testing in the hospital and other affiliated clinics where these children were evaluated. This is also consistent with national estimates of increased influenza testing starting in 2017 [27].

The present work was among a specific sample of children who resided in Rochester, NY. The sample was restricted to children who were born at the Strong Memorial hospital, this led to a restriction in residential location of these children due to linkage to SPDS data. This resulted in a more homogeneous group of children with relation to socio-economic and community-level characteristics, evidenced by the null associations observed for the community- level socio-economic factors. Among our sample, 50% of participants were of non-White race, > 10% of Hispanic ethnicity, and > 60% had public insurance. Since the sample restriction was related to location of birth, our missing data were not missing at random. Due to this systematic missingness, multiple imputations were not an appropriate method to use.

Sensitivity analyses examining the predictors of influenza diagnosis among vaccinated children observed similar results to the full sample, albeit with less precision due to a further reduction in sample size. Influenza vaccine coverage in the US is associated with race, ethnicity, and SES factors [28,29]. The restrictions in our study sample may have led to the different observations in the present study. Despite this limitation, this study further supported evidence of sex differences. In our analysis females appeared to have a 39% reduced risk of influenza diagnosis, as compared with males. This is consistent with studies among children and adolescents which have observed sex differences among vaccine responses [30-33].

The present study has three key strengths. Many demographic, maternal, and socio-economic predictors were considered in the present analysis. This is one of few studies which have included a comprehensive list of non-clinical determinants for RSV and influenza diagnosis among children as most studies have focused on clinical predictors. In addition, this work investigated laboratory confirmed RSV and influenza diagnosis of all severities in the same study sample. Most literature examines these conditions separately with a focus on hospitalized or severe cases of disease. Although the restricted sample may be considered a limitation due to generalizability, discussed below, it can also be considered strength as this study was able to examine a low-income, underrepresented, urban sample of children. And lastly, RSV and influenza data were available over seven respiratory seasons and so trends of diagnosis could be observed.

The present study also has limitations: 1) Lack of clinical predictors, 2) Specific study sample, and 3) No influenza vaccine information. Most other studies examining predictors of RSV and influenza diagnosis among children have only considered clinical predictors. These predictors include underlying medical conditions, symptoms, and other genetic and immune- related factors [7,10,20,22,34-36]. These predictors have been relatively well-established, however, comprehensive examinations of the demographic, socio-economic, and maternal factors around these diagnoses in childhood are lacking. As previously described, given non-random missingness to the study sample, a restricted sample of children residing in the City of Rochester, NY was investigated. Although this sample is not generalizable to the larger United States population it is likely representative of other pediatric populations with a higher proportion of Black race, lower-income and SES households, and residence in an urban setting. Lastly, despite influenza vaccine information not being available for all study subjects, a sensitivity analysis among children with a reported vaccination rendered similar results with the full sample.

In conclusion, while considering multiple demographic, maternal, and community-level socio-economic predictors of RSV and influenza diagnosis among children, age was observed as the strongest predictor of both infections. Future work should examine these predictors in addition to clinical predictors among community cases of RSV and influenza, including severe and non-severe cases.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Edwin van Wijngaarden for his role in the initial conception of the project and his knowledge and expertise throughout the duration of the study. Funding sources include a Toxicology T32 training grant (T32 ES007026) and URMC P30 EHSC Center grant (P30 ES001247).

Conflicts of Interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Rha B, Curns AT, Lively JY, Campbell AP, Englund JA, et al. (2020) Respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalizations among young children: 2015-2016. Pediatrics 146: e20193611.
  2. Hansen CL, Chaves SS, Demont C, Viboud C (2022) Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the US, 1999-2018. JAMA Netw Open 5: e220527.
  3. (CDC) CfDCaP Prophylaxis and high-risk infants and young children.
  4. Hall CB (2012) The burgeoning burden of respiratory syncytial virus among children. Infect Disord Drug Targets 12: 92-97.
  5. Rolfes MA, Foppa IM, Garg S, Flannery B, Brammer L, et al. (2018) Annual estimates of the burden of seasonal influenza in the United States: A tool for strengthening influenza surveillance and preparedness. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 12: 132-137.
  6. Flannery B, Kondor RJG, Chung JR, Gaglani M, Reis M, et al. (2020) Spread of Antigenically Drifted Influenza A(H3N2) viruses and vaccine effectiveness in the united states during the 2018-2019 season. J Infect Dis 221: 8-15.
  7. Durani Y, Friedman MJ, Attia MW (2008) Clinical predictors of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children. Pediatr Int 50: 352-355.
  8. Simoes EA (2003) Environmental and demographic risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease. J Pediatr 143: S118-S126.
  9. Sangare L, Curtis MP, Ahmad S (2006) Hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus among California infants: Disparities related to race, insurance, and geography. J Pediatr 149: 373-377.
  10. Woolpert T, Brodine S, Lemus H, Waalen J, Blair P, et al. (2012) Determination of clinical and demographic predictors of laboratory-confirmed influenza with subtype analysis. BMC Infect Dis 12: 129.
  11. Ohmit SE, Monto AS (2006) Symptomatic predictors of influenza virus positivity in children during the influenza season. Clin Infect Dis 43: 564-568.
  12. Young M, Smitherman L (2021) Socioeconomic impact of RSV hospitalization. Infect Dis Ther 10: 35-45.
  13. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, Blumkin AK, Edwards KM, et al. (2009) The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med 360: 588-598.
  14. Yuan Y (2011) Multiple imputation using SAS software. Journal of Statistical Software 45: 1-25.
  15. Feiler MO, Caserta MT, van Wijngaarden E, Thevenet-Morrison K, Hardy DJ, et al. (2020) Environmental lead exposure and influenza and respiratory syncytial virus diagnoses in young children: A test-negative case-control study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 7625.
  16. Fukushima W, Hirota Y (2017) Basic principles of test-negative design in evaluating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 35: 4796-4800.
  17. Fielding JE (2016) Methodological evolution of influenza vaccine effectiveness assessment. Lancet Infect Dis 16: 874-875.
  18. Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 473-489.
  19. Monto AS, Sullivan KM (1993) Acute respiratory illness in the community. Frequency of illness and the agents involved. Epidemiol Infect 110: 145-160.
  20. Garcia MN, Philpott DC, Murray KO, Ontiveros A, Revell PA, et al. (2015) Clinical predictors of disease severity during the 2009- 2010 A(HIN1) influenza virus pandemic in a paediatric population. Epidemiol Infect 143: 2939-2949.
  21. Miller MR, Peters TR, Suerken CK, Snively BM, Poehling KA (2015) Predictors of influenza diagnosis among patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza. J Infect Dis 212: 1604-1612.
  22. Law BJ, Langley JM, Allen U, Paes B, Lee DSC, et al. (2004) The pediatric investigators collaborative network on infections in Canada study of predictors of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection for infants born at 33 through 35 completed weeks of gestation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23: 806-814.
  23. Purcell K, Fergie J (2004) Driscoll children’s hospital respiratory syncytial virus database: Risk factors, treatment and hospital course in 3308 infants and young children, 1991 to 2002. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23: 418-423.
  24. Fitzpatrick T, McNally JD, Stukel TA, Lu H, Fisman D, et al. (2021) Family and child risk factors for early-life RSV illness. Pediatrics 147: e2020029090.
  25. Liese JG, Grill E, Fischer B, Roeckl-Wiedmann I, Carr D, et al. (2003) Incidence and risk factors of respiratory syncytial virus-related hospitalizations in premature infants in Germany. Eur J Pediatr 162: 230-236.
  26. Raqib R, Alam DS, Sarker P, Ahmad SM, Ara G, et al. (2007) Low birth weight is associated with altered immune function in rural Bangladeshi children: A birth cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 845-852.
  27. CDC (2022) Estimated flu-related illnesses, medical visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in the United States - 2018-2019 flu season.
  28. Esposito S, Marchisio P, Droghetti R, Lambertini L, Faelli N, et al. (2006) Influenza vaccination coverage among children with high-risk medical conditions. Vaccine 24: 5251-5255.
  29. Imburgia TM, Hendrix KS, Donahue KL, Sturm LA, Zimet GD (2017) Predictors of influenza vaccination in the US among children 9-13 years of age. Vaccine 35: 2338-2342.
  30. Green MS, Shohat T, Lerman Y, Cohen D, Slepon R, et al. (1994) Sex differences in the humoral antibody response to live measles vaccine in young adults. Int J Epidemiol 23: 1078-1081.
  31. Riggenbach MM, Haralambieva IH, Ovsyannikova IG, Schaid DJ, Poland GA, et al. (2022) Mumps virus-specific immune response outcomes and sex-based differences in a cohort of healthy adolescents. Clin Immunol 234: 108912.
  32. Ohm M, Boef AGC, Stoof SP, van Ravenhorst MB, van der Klis FRM, et al. (2022) Sex-related differences in the immune response to meningococcal vaccinations during adolescence. Front Public Health 10: 871670.
  33. Hoes J, Knol MJ, Mollema L, Buisman A, de Melker HE, et al. (2019) Comparison of antibody response between boys and girls after infant and childhood vaccinations in the Netherlands. Vaccine 37: 4504-4510.
  34. Stranák Z, Saliba E, Kosma P, Posfay-Barbe K, Yunis K, et al. (2016) Predictors of RSV LRTI hospitalization in infants born at 33 to 35 weeks gestational age: A large multinational study (PONI). PLoS One 11: e0157446.
  35. Conway NT, Wake ZV, Richmond PC, Smith DW, Keil AD, et al. (2012) Clinical predictors of influenza in young children: The limitations of “Influenza-Like Illness”. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2: 21-29.
  36. Dalziel SR, Thompson JM, Macias CG, Fernandes RM, Johnson DW, et al. (2013) Predictors of severe H1N1 infection in children presenting within Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN): Retrospective case-control study. BMJ 347: f4836.

Citation

Feiler MO, Yucel R, Liu Z, Caserta M, Lawrence BP, et al. (2023) Trends and Non-Clinical Predictors of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza Diagnosis in an Urban Pediatric Population. Int J Pediatr Res 9:112. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5769/1510112