What Happens if The Patient Does Not Tell the Truth to His Anesthesiologist?
Alev Oztas1, Ezgi Erkilic2*, Elvin Kesimci2, Ibrahim Keser3 and Duran Canatan4
1Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Melidpark Hospital, Turkey
2Ataturk Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
3Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University, Turkey
4AGTC diagnosis of Genetic Disorders Center, Antalya, Turkey
*Corresponding author: Ezgi Erkilic, Consultant of Anesthesia, Ataturk Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, Tel: 905054000000, E-mail: email@example.com
Int J Anesthetic Anesthesiol, IJAA-1-010, (Volume 1, Issue 2), Case Report; ISSN: 2377-4630
Received: September 09, 2014 | Accepted: October 18, 2014 | Published: October 20, 2014
Citation: Oztas A, Erkilic E, Kesimci E, Keser I, Canatan D (2014) What Happens if The Patient Does Not Tell the Truth to His Anesthesiologist?. Int J Anesthetic Anesthesiol 1:010. 10.23937/2377-4630/1010
Copyright: © 2014 Oztas A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is the case report of a young man, whose clinical condition has not been identified properly in the preoperative evaluation. A 27-yr-old man presented with complaints of nasal obstruction. His clinical examination was almost unremarkable, except for indistinct cyanosis at the lips. He denied any symptoms related cardiovascular and respiratory systems. A chest radiograph was normal, as were all laboratory investigations. He had received general anesthesia with persistent low pulse oximetry readings. This led us to investigate him further in the postoperative period and to report Kansas haemoglobin as the first, benign haemoglobinopathy from Turkish population.
Preoperative evaluation, Cyanosis, Haemoglobinopathy
The anesthesiologists perform preoperative evaluation for not only providing comfort and safety to patients; but also; to get accurate clinical profile of the patient for reducing surgery-anesthesia related complications. This preanaesthetic assessment has several objectives, like measuring risk and reporting it to the patient and reviewing diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Besides, he may request further diagnostic tests if needed. Thus, he reports the anesthetic technique and answers the patient's questions about it. Kluger et al; showed that 11% of intraoperative incidents, that could be avoided; resulted because of poor preoperative evaluation . It's been suggested that; a careful physical examination and the history of the patient are noteworthy even more than the preoperative tests [2-4]. In elective surgery, the consent must be signed within a minimum time in advance. Otherwise the consent is not legally valid. On the other hand, a preliminary check-list is recommended in hospitals, as surgical quality standard and safety procedure. However; the physical structure of an anesthesia clinic as well as economical issues may sometimes cause limitations in preoperative evaluation and counseling of patients. Besides, less attention shown to the discussion with the patient cause's lack of confidence, even lack of incorporation for telling the truth about their clinical condition.
This report emphasizes the importance of adequate preoperative anesthetic evaluation for patients, in providing necessary conditions and taking precautions in achieving a successful outcome, for not only anesthesiologists; but also for physicians caring afterwards..
A 27-yr-old male with snoring admitted to the hospital. He was diagnosed as septal deviation and scheduled for an elective septoplasty operation by the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) surgeon. Afterwards he was sent to the anesthesiologist. Nothing was remarkable in his clinical examination, except for undistinguishable cyanosis at the lips. The patient reported no complications and family history. All laboratory examinations (Complete Blood Count (CBC), biochemical tests) and the chest radiograph were normal. So, as planned, the patient was taken to the operating room, in the morning of surgery. The patient was not premedicated. In the operating room, standard monitoring including pulse oximetry (SpO2), electrocardiography, and Noninvasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) was initiated. On room air, the SpO2 recorded a value of 70% that could be increased to 85% by deep inspiration when oxygen was administered at 6 liters/min by a face mask. The plethysmograph trace was of good quality, but the values did not improve any more. When asked to the patient, he began to tell about the same condition in three members of his family. He also confessed that he was afraid of telling this truth; since he was afraid of cancellation of his surgery. Thus, he was offered to postpone the operation for further counselling. Nevertheless, he insisted on having the surgery, giving an informed consent about the present condition. The surgeon and the anesthesiologist decided not to cancel the operation. A 16 G peripheral venous catheter was inserted and 1g cefazolin was administered.
Anesthesia induction was achieved by oxygen (FiO2:100%), propofol 150 mg, fentanyl 200 mcg, and rocuronium bromide 50 mg, and further maintained by sevoflurane 2%, and O2 100%. During this period; SpO2 did not exceed over 85%. At the end of surgery lasting 75 min, the patient was extubated uneventfully. After 15 minutes he recovered completely. His hemodynamic parameters and respiratory functions were stable. He had a SpO2 value of 75% on room air.
He was evaluated in the afternoon, on the same day, for persistently low SpO2 values. Pulmonary specialist was consulted. A repeat chest radiograph revealed no abnormalities, while arterial blood gas showed low arterial oxygen saturation of 60.8 % and a normal PaO2 of 95.7 mmHg. His Complete Blood Count (CBC) was normal. Hemoglobin assessment by electrophoresis, and following DNA analysis detected the patient to have 30% of Kansas Haemoglobin . Pulse oximetry on the patient's mother, aunt, grandmother and son also revealed SpO2 values < 80% on room air. The next day, the patient was discharged with advices for further counselling and subsequent family screening.
The preanaesthetic assessment of a surgical patient by an anesthesiologist plays a vital role in interaction between the patient and physician. During this process; patient's medical condition, overall health status, risk factors against the anesthesia are discussed and the patient is informed to give consent. By this way, problems identified might be addressed before surgery to reduce anesthetic complications . Also, an effective preoperative interview was shown to influence patient's anxiety, satisfaction and confidence [7,8]. However, the time invested in the preoperative evaluation is neither equal nor adequate, for all patients, at all preoperative evaluation clinics . Besides, lack of communication might cause the patients to get afraid of cancellation of their surgeries, as seen in our case. Thus, they might not tell the truth about themselves. In most of the developing countries, impossibilities related to time and unequal opportunities for the patients are a serious problem leading to misunderstanding between the patient and the physician.
Thalassemias and hemoglobinopathies are a group of disorders with a reported incidence ranging from 0.6% to 13.0% in Turkey. However, Turkey hosts different racial, cultural, ethnic groups due to its geographical position, thus; some hemoglobin variants may remain unknown .
The anesthesiologists may encounter these disorders, as the primary cause of a surgical procedure, with a problem arising from the disease itself or coincidentally during the surgery, as seen in this case. Actually, preoperative preparation is very important as anesthetic technique, since one of the most important rules of the anesthetic act is to avoid the stress before, during and after the surgery . Stress and anxiety; if not avoided, may lead to changes in oxygenation, acid-base balance, tissue perfusion, and thermoregulation related to the oxygen carrying capacity of the variant hemoglobin .
As far as we know; this is the first anesthetic experience with a patient with Kansas hemoglobin from Turkey. Fortunately; many of these disorders, have a benign clinical course. Our patient was an asymptomatic one with low SpO2 values. Indeed, he hesitated to inform us about his and his family members' cyanosis and we failed to consider its cause.
The accurate management of this patient was exactly to consultate the patient with a cardiologist and to see if oxygen increased the low SpO2 levels monitored at the preanesthetic evaluation prior to the operating day. If detected and suspected earlier, he should have an arterial blood gas analysis by co-oximetry, to rule out any methemoglobin or carboxyhemoglobin. Besides, PaO2 should be documented and further investigations with hemoglobin studies should follow to identify the abnormal hemoglobin variant, prior to surgery. Probably, more detailed and careful physical examination with actual history of the patient would be worthy even more than the preoperative tests .
In summary, clinically inconsequential problems, like abnormal hemoglobin variants may be encountered by the anesthesiologists. The anesthesiologist must build a trusting relationship with the patient and spare enough time preoperatively to discuss health problems; so that some infrequent problems can be openly discussed and solved prior to surgery. However; what's more important is that the anesthesiologists have to investigate possible health problems if some suspicious signs are discovered, because the patients cannot be always relied on. This is what makes anesthesiology both a science and an art; bringing a humanistic approach to it.
Kluger MT, Tham EJ, Coleman NA, Runciman WB, Bullock MF (2000) Inadequate preoperative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study. Anaesthesia 55: 1173-1178.
Yen C, Mitchell T, Macario A (2010) Preoperative evaluation clinics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23: 167-172.
van Klei WA, Moons KG, Rutten CL, Schuurhuis A, Knape JT (2002) The effect of outpatient preoperative evaluation of Hospital inpatients on cancellation of surgery and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analg 94: 644-649.
Halaszynski TM, Juda R, Silverman DG (2004) Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management. Crit Care Med 32: 76-88.
Bonaventura J, Riggs A (1968) Hemoglobin Kansas, a human hemoglobin with a neutral aminoacid substitucion and an abnormal oxygen equilibrium. J Biol Chem 243: 980.
Haberkern CM, Lecky JH (1996) Preoperative assessment and the anesthesia clinic. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 14: 609-630.
Egbert LD, Battit G, Turndorf H, Beecher HK (1963) The value of the preoperative visit by an anesthetist. A study of doctor-patient rapport. JAMA 185: 553-555.
Kindler CH, Szirt L, Sommer D, Hausler R, Langewitz W (2005) A quantitative analysis of anaesthetist-patient communication during the pre-operative visit. Anaesthesia 60: 53-59.
Kim JH (2012) Preoperative evaluation of a surgical patient; preanesthetic interview by anesthesiology residents. Korean J Anesthesiol 62:207-208.
Tadmouri GO, Tuzmen S, Ozcelik H, Ozer A, Baig SM, et al. (1998) Molecular and Population Genetic Analyses of b-Thalassemia in Turkey. Am J Hematol 57: 215-220.
Deiner S, Lin HM, Bodansky D, Silverstein J, Sano M (2014) Do Stress Markers and Anesthetic Technique Predict Delirium in the Elderly?. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 38: 366-374.
Holbrook SP, Quinn A (2008) An unusual explanation for low oxygen saturation. Br J Anaesth 101: 350-353.