Join Us | Latest Articles | Contact

Journal Home

Editorial Board


Submit to this journal

Current issue

International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research

DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/2/4/1028

Targeting of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells Using Anti-inflammatory and Pro-inflammatory Agents

Parvin Forghani* and Edmund K Waller

Department of Hematology & Medical Oncology, WCI, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

*Corresponding author: Parvin Forghani, Department of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Tel: 404-727-4995, Fax: 404-778-5530, E-mail:
Int J Cancer Clin Res, IJCCR-2-028, (Volume 2, Issue 4), Review Article; ISSN: 2378-3419
Received: September 03, 2015 | Accepted: October 01, 2015 | Published: October 03, 2015
Citation: Forghani P, Waller EK (2015) Targeting of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells Using Anti-inflammatory and Pro-inflammatory Agents. Int J Cancer Clin Res 2:028. 10.23937/2378-3419/2/4/1028
Copyright: © 2015 Forghani P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have been considered to be key mediators of immuno-suppression in cancer. The numbers of MDSCs increased in the blood and in the tumor microenvironment during inflammation. Due to the strong correlation between inflammation and cancer that results in tumor progression through MDSCs-associated immune-suppression, it is posited that modulating MDSCs using anti-inflammatory drugs will enhance the activity of immunotherapy and antitumor immunity. This review will discuss strategies using both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory agents that modulate MDCSs, with a particular focus on potential advantages and disadvantage of some strategies. The use of anti-inflammatory agents that suppress MDSCs activation with pro-inflammatory agents that enhance immune responses may provide a logical reason for using new combination therapy in cancer.


MDSC, Anti- inflammatory, Pro- inflammatory, Cancer


It is identified that there are various immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment including regulatory T cells (Tregs) [1-3], N2 neutrophils [4], regulatory dendritic cells (DCs) [5], Tie2-expressing monocytes [6], and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [7,8]. Among of those, MDSC, a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells containing precursors of granulocytes, macrophages, and immature DCs, has recently made a lot of attention because of their key roles in creating inflammatory tumor microenvironment.

Association of inflammation with tumor progression through accumulation of MDSC has been resulted in inhibition of anti-tumor immunity and facilitating tumor growth [9,10]. MDSCs are expanded in bone marrow and recruited into the blood, lymph nodes, and tumor microenvironment of experimental animals or patients with cancer to inhibit both adaptive and innate immunity [9,11-14]. In individuals with established cancer, MDSCs were introduced as a key factor in preventing the efficacy of immunotherapies [10,15].

So far, several approaches have been suggested to modulate MDSCs via different mechanisms including: inhibition of tumor-derived factors, suppression of generation and/or expansion of MDSCs from hematopoietic progenitors, differentiation of MDSCs into mature cells, blockade of MDSC trafficking, and abrogating immune suppressive activities of MDSCs [16-19]. Despite using several clinical trials in patients with different tumor types, however, the overall results of these trials are disappointing [20,21]. To overcome immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment and to achieve better efficiency of cancer immunotherapy, new promising agents that modulate MDSCs numbers or functions parallel with increasing immune responses are needed.

Characteristic of MDSCs

MDSCs are immature myeloid cells that under chronic inflammatory conditions like tumor microenvironment acquire strong immunosuppressive functions that allow them to inhibit efficiently T-cell mediated anti-tumor reactivity by various mechanisms [22-25]. MDSCs express Gr1 and CD11b surface markers in mice, whereas there is no human analog of Gr1. Mouse MDSCs consist of two major subsets: CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow (granulocytic) and CD11b+Ly6G+/-Ly6Chigh cells (monocytic) which showed difference in their immunosuppressive mechanisms [12,26]. Counterparts of mouse MDSCs in human, distinguished as CD11b+CD15+ for granulocytic and CD11b+ CD14+ for monocytic cells in a Lin-HLA-DR-CD33+ cells [14,18].

Immunosuppressive mechanisms of MDSCs

It is identified that both G-MDSC and M-MDSC can inhibit T cells through different mechanisms [15,24]. A significant portion of MDSCs abilities to suppress T cells in mouse and human models is through i) generation of Peroxynitrite by arginase (Arg) and inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS) [27,28]. Whereas the generation of NO and secretion of ARG-1 is mainly used by M-MDSC, G-MDSC produced ROS mediated through the increased activity of NADPH oxidase (NOX) 2. ii) Down-regulation of TCR cell surface expression by decreasing CD3 ζ-chain biosynthesis [29]; iii) Interfere with T-cell trafficking through expression of the metalloproteinase domain (ADAM) 17, which decreases CD62 ligand expression [30]. iv) Activation and expansion of Treg cells [31]; v) Induction of anergy in NK cells through membrane bound TGF-β, STAT5 activity, or via the NKp30 receptor [7,32]. Also MDSCs can suppress NK cell cytotoxicity by inhibiting NKG2D and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production in models of glioma [33]. Collectively, MDSCs can use diverse mechanisms to affect immune and non-immune cells and create an environment that suppressing anti-tumor immune responses.

Inflammation, tumor and MDSC

Contribution of chronic inflammation to tumor progression suggested by Rudolf Virchow [15,34,34]. During two last decades, accumulating evidence has indicated that chronic inflammation promotes tumor onset and development through different mechanisms such as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and production of matrix metalloproteases (MMP) s, which facilitate invasion and metastasis [34]. Additionally, different studies have shown that pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β [36], IL-6 [17], GM-CSF, and G-CSF, which are found in the microenvironment of many tumors, significantly increase MDSC accumulation and suppress T cell activation and function [11,37,38]. Furthermore, IL-1β induced inflammation, which aids MDSC and macrophage cross-talk, resulting in increasing MDSC mediated of immune suppression [11,39].

Because of the connection between inflammation and cancer, blocking inflammatory mediators regulating inflammation are expected to be effective in reducing tumor incidence and delaying tumor growth [7,19,40]. Different strategies target MDSCs directly by changing their expansion, recruitment, phenotype and/or immunosuppressive activity [13]. i) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors target the COX-2 enzyme and suppress activation of MDSCs through CCL2, CXCL12, or PGE2 inhibition and increase cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) [41,42]. ii) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is an anti-inflammatory molecule expressed in the myeloid-lineage [43]. Dominant-negative PPARγ expression in myeloid cells reduces expansion of the CD11b+Ly6G+ population [44]. iii) Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors including: sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil are used for treatment of nonmalignant diseases. These drugs increase infiltration of activated CTLs into tumor and tumor-induced T cell through down-regulation of Arg1, iNOS, and IL-4α expression in MDSCs [40]. VI) Bardoxolone methyl, also known as CDDO-Me or RTA 402, is a synthetic triterpenoid, which has anticancer and cancer-preventive activities. It has been shown to be a potent activator of the transcription factor NFR2, which up-regulates several antioxidant genes resulted in abrogation of immunosuppressive activities of MDSCs and restored immune responses in both preclinical murine model and patients with renal cell carcinoma [45,46]. V) Silibinin, a natural flavonoid from the seeds of milk thistle, has been used as an anti-inflammatory agent to reduce the toxicity of cancer chemotherapy [47]. Our findings in an advanced tumor model of breast (4T1) showed that the decrease in tumor growth and MDSC accumulation in the blood of silibinin-treated tumor-bearing animals is not primarily due to a direct anti-tumor effect on 4T1 cells or suppression of MDSC development in bone marrow, but rather represents an indirect effect of silibinin on T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. Also silibinin treatment resulted in immune polarization to a M1 phenotype in the tumor microenvironment. Our data also indicate that silibinin decreases MDSC in a chemokine (CCR2) dependent manner that provide a mechanism for the decreased accumulation of MDSC in the tumor and a decrease in tumor-associated immunosuppression [48].

In contrast to anti-inflammatory mediators, there are a few reports for effects of pro-inflammatory mediators on MDSCs. For example: i) S100A8/A9 proteins induce MDSCs accumulation, therefore, and in vivo blocking of S100A8/A9 binding, reduces, but does not eliminate MDSC accumulation in tumor-bearing mice [38]. ii) Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blocks myeloid cell differentiation and augment the suppressive activity of MDSCs in chronic inflammatory settings. Administration of a TNF-α antagonist (etanercept) reduces MDSCs' suppressive activity and promotes their maturation into dendritic cells and macrophages [19,49]. While heightened levels of pro-inflammatory mediators or adoptive transfer of inflammatory cells increases tumor development [50], we have shown that iii) Poly (I: C), a pro-inflammatory agent decreased MDSCs in both blood and tumor, directly acting on MDSCs. Poly (I: C) stimulated MDSC exhibited a "matured" phenotype, based on increased CD80, CD86, and MHC II expression when compared to un-stimulated MDSC obtained from murine spleens. Poly (I: C) in the setting of breast cancer affects MDSC generation, differentiation and also targets cancer cells, consequently leading to reduction of MDSC numbers and lower MDSC suppressive function, and improving tumor-specific T-cell functions [51].

Combination therapy and adverse effects of known approaches

Current studies are focused on combination of MDSCs-based approaches with different forms of immunotherapy targeting the function and/or numbers of MDSCs as follows: i) Gemcitabine has been shown to reduce splenic MDSC levels in tumor bearing mice and combining gemcitabine with IFN-beta markedly enhanced anti-tumor efficacy in a HER-2/neu tumor model [52]. ii) sunitinib therapy in combination with low-dose radiotherapy modestly improved survival in a mouse model of glioma [53]. Of note, combined therapy with high dose radiation, resulted in fatal toxicities and limiting the feasibility of this combination [21,53]. iii) Combining the TroVAax (MVA-5T4) vaccine with sunitinib, IL-2, or IFN-α in RCC patients (phase III trial), did not enhance survival relative to sunitinib alone (or IL-2 or IFN-α alone) [54]. Some treatments that target MDSCs showed pleiotropic effects on other immune system components. Chemotherapeutic drugs that are commonly used to treat cancer not only affect the tumor but also the immune system, having a crucial impact on antitumor responses [55,56]. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of chemotherapy approaches, which selectively eliminated MDSC at low doses also showed strong negative effects on the immune system making immunotherapy ineffective [57]. Another study showed that treatment with CPT11 or the 5FU + CPT11 combination accumulates MDSCs and produce elevated levels of NO and ROS that resulted in DNA damage during colorectal cancer [58,59]. Also, using anti-Gr-1 mAb for depletion of MDSCs in mice [60,61] has been showed adverse effect on memory CD8+ T cells, γδT cells and mice plasmacytoid dendritic cells expressing GR-1 [62-65]. Altogether, above reported toxic effects of these approaches must be considered in the future design of new combination therapies.


Taken together, it is mandatory to have novel strategies that target MDSCs and boost immune responses to achieve better efficiency of cancer immunotherapy. Given the critical role of MDSCs in suppressing T-cell activation and proliferation and regulation of cell mediated anti-tumor immunity, it is time to investigate the influence of drugs with both anti- and pro-inflammatory effects on MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment. The concept of modulation of MDSCSs through combining of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory drugs may lead to the development of a potent anticancer therapy.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Beyer M, Schultze JL (2009) Regulatory T cells: major players in the tumor microenvironment. Curr Pharm Des 15: 1879-1892.

  2. Jones E, Dahm-Vicker M, Golgher D, Gallimore A (2003) CD25+ regulatory T cells and tumor immunity. Immunol Lett 85: 141-143.

  3. Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, Okumura H, et al. (2003) Tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 23: 4079-4083.

  4. Mishalian I, Bayuh R, Levy L, Zolotarov L, Michaeli J, et al. (2013) Tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN) develop pro-tumorigenic properties during tumor progression. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62: 1745-1756.

  5. Rutella S, Lemoli RM (2004) Regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells: from basic biology to clinical applications. Immunol Lett 94: 11-26.

  6. Patel AS, Smith A, Nucera S, Biziato D, Saha P, et al. (2013) TIE2-expressing monocytes/macrophages regulate revascularization of the ischemic limb. EMBO Mol Med 5: 858-869.

  7. Lindau D, Gielen P, Kroesen M, Wesseling P, Adema GJ (2013) The immunosuppressive tumour network: myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and natural killer T cells. Immunology 138: 105-115.

  8. Marvel D, Gabrilovich DI (2015) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: expect the unexpected. J Clin Invest 125: 3356-3364.

  9. Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P (2009) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer. J Immunol 182: 4499-4506.

  10. Wesolowski R, Markowitz J, Carson WE 3rd (2013) Myeloid derived suppressor cells - a new therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer. J Immunother Cancer 1: 10.

  11. Bunt SK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2006) Inflammation induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that facilitate tumor progression. J Immunol 176: 284-290.

  12. Youn JI, Nagaraj S, Collazo M, Gabrilovich DI (2008) Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol 181: 5791-5802.

  13. Forghani P, Harris W, Giver CR, Mirshafiey A, Galipeau J, et al. (2013) Properties of immature myeloid progenitors with nitric-oxide-dependent immunosuppressive activity isolated from bone marrow of tumor-free mice. PLoS One 8: e64837.

  14. Montero AJ, Diaz-Montero CM, Kyriakopoulos CE, Bronte V, Mandruzzato S (2012) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients: a clinical perspective. J Immunother 35: 107-115.

  15. Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V (2012) Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 253-268.

  16. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M (2010) Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140: 883-899.

  17. Sumida K, Wakita D, Narita Y, Masuko K, Terada S, et al. (2012) Anti-IL-6 receptor mAb eliminates myeloid-derived suppressor cells and inhibits tumor growth by enhancing T-cell responses. Eur J Immunol 42: 2060-2072.

  18. Goedegebuure P, Mitchem JB, Porembka MR, Tan MC, Belt BA, et al. (2011) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: general characteristics and relevance to clinical management of pancreatic cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 11: 734-751.

  19. Katoh H, Watanabe M (2015) Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Therapeutic Strategies in Cancer. Mediators Inflamm 2015: 159269.

  20. Najjar YG, Finke JH (2013) Clinical perspectives on targeting of myeloid derived suppressor cells in the treatment of cancer. Front Oncol 3: 49.

  21. Dallas J, Imanirad I, Rajani R, Dagan R, Subbiah S, et al. (2012) Response to sunitinib in combination with proton beam radiation in a patient with chondrosarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 6: 41.

  22. Baniyash M (2006) Chronic inflammation, immunosuppression and cancer: new insights and outlook. Semin Cancer Biol 16: 80-88.

  23. Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2010) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: more mechanisms for inhibiting antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59: 1593-1600.

  24. Condamine T, Gabrilovich DI (2011) Molecular mechanisms regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell differentiation and function. Trends Immunol 32: 19-25.

  25. Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Serafini P, Zanovello P, Bronte V (2008) Tumor-induced tolerance and immune suppression by myeloid derived suppressor cells. Immunol Rev 222: 162-179.

  26. Dolcetti L, Peranzoni E, Ugel S, Marigo I, Fernandez Gomez A, et al. (2010) Hierarchy of immunosuppressive strength among myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets is determined by GM-CSF. Eur J Immunol 40: 22-35.

  27. Jayaraman P, Parikh F, Lopez-Rivera E, Hailemichael Y, Clark A, et al. (2012) Tumor-expressed inducible nitric oxide synthase controls induction of functional myeloid-derived suppressor cells through modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor release. J Immunol 188: 5365-5376.

  28. Forghani P, Khorramizadeh MR, Waller EK (2012) Natural suppressor cells; past, present and future. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 4: 1237-1245.

  29. Rodriguez PC, Ernstoff MS, Hernandez C, Atkins M, Zabaleta J, et al. (2009) Arginase I-producing myeloid-derived suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma are a subpopulation of activated granulocytes. Cancer Res 69: 1553-1560.

  30. Hanson EM, Clements VK, Sinha P, Ilkovitch D, Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2009) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells down-regulate L-selectin expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 183: 937-944.

  31. Pan PY, Ma G, Weber KJ, Ozao-Choy J, Wang G, et al. (2010) Immune stimulatory receptor CD40 is required for T-cell suppression and T regulatory cell activation mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer. Cancer Res 70: 99-108.

  32. Hoechst B, Voigtlaender T, Ormandy L, Gamrekelashvili J, Zhao F, et al. (2009) Myeloid derived suppressor cells inhibit natural killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the NKp30 receptor. Hepatology 50: 799-807.

  33. Alizadeh D, Zhang L, Brown CE, Farrukh O, Jensen MC, et al. (2010) Induction of anti-glioma natural killer cell response following multiple low-dose intracerebral CpG therapy. Clin Cancer Res 16: 3399-3408.

  34. Landskron G, De la Fuente M, Thuwajit P, Thuwajit C, Hermoso MA (2014) Chronic inflammation and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. J Immunol Res 2014: 149185.

  35. Quail DF, Joyce JA (2013) Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19: 1423-1437.

  36. Elkabets M, Ribeiro VS, Dinarello CA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Di Santo JP, et al. (2010) IL-1β regulates a novel myeloid-derived suppressor cell subset that impairs NK cell development and function. Eur J Immunol 40: 3347-3357.

  37. Song X, Krelin Y, Dvorkin T, Bjorkdahl O, Segal S, et al. (2005) CD11b+/Gr-1+ immature myeloid cells mediate suppression of T cells in mice bearing tumors of IL-1beta-secreting cells. J Immunol 175: 8200-8208.

  38. Sinha P, Okoro C, Foell D, Freeze HH, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, et al. (2008) Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol 181: 4666-4675.

  39. Tu S, Bhagat G, Cui G, Takaishi S, Kurt-Jones EA, et al. (2008) Overexpression of interleukin-1beta induces gastric inflammation and cancer and mobilizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice. Cancer Cell 14: 408-419.

  40. Monu NR, Frey AB (2012) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and anti-tumor T cells: a complex relationship. Immunol Invest 41: 595-613.

  41. Sinha P, Clements VK, Fulton AM, Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2007) Prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res 67: 4507-4513.

  42. Serafini P (2010) Editorial: PGE2-producing MDSC: a role in tumor progression? J Leukoc Biol 88: 827-829.

  43. Jiang C, Ting AT, Seed B (1998) PPAR-gamma agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature 391: 82-86.

  44. Wu L, Yan C, Czader M, Foreman O, Blum JS, et al. (2012) Inhibition of PPARĪ³ in myeloid-lineage cells induces systemic inflammation, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis. Blood 119: 115-126.

  45. Wang YY, Yang YX, Zhe H, He ZX, Zhou SF (2014) Bardoxolone methyl (CDDO-Me) as a therapeutic agent: an update on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Drug Des Devel Ther 8: 2075-2088.

  46. Rossi A, Kapahi P, Natoli G, Takahashi T, Chen Y, et al. (2000) Anti-inflammatory cyclopentenone prostaglandins are direct inhibitors of IkappaB kinase. Nature 403: 103-108.

  47. Agarwal C, Wadhwa R, Deep G, Biedermann D, Gazak R, et al. (2013) Anti-cancer efficacy of silybin derivatives -- a structure-activity relationship. PLoS One 8: e60074.

  48. Forghani P, Khorramizadeh MR, Waller EK (2014) Silibinin inhibits accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor growth of murine breast cancer. Cancer Med 3: 215-224.

  49. Sade-Feldman M, Kanterman J, Ish-Shalom E, Elnekave M, Horwitz E, et al. (2013) Tumor necrosis factor-α blocks differentiation and enhances suppressive activity of immature myeloid cells during chronic inflammation. Immunity 38: 541-554.

  50. Bunt SK, Yang L, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, et al. (2007) Reduced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment delays the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and limits tumor progression. Cancer Res 67: 10019-10026.

  51. Forghani P, Waller EK (2015) Poly (I: C) modulates the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in a murine model of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153: 21-30.

  52. Suzuki E, Kapoor V, Jassar AS, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM (2005) Gemcitabine selectively eliminates splenic Gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells in tumor-bearing animals and enhances antitumor immune activity. Clin Cancer Res 11: 6713-6721.

  53. D'Amico R, Lei L, Kennedy BC, Sisti J, Ebiana V, et al. (2012) The addition of Sunitinib to radiation delays tumor growth in a murine model of glioblastoma. Neurol Res 34: 252-261.

  54. Tykodi SS, Thompson JA (2008) Development of modified vaccinia Ankara-5T4 as specific immunotherapy for advanced human cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 8: 1947-1953.

  55. Bruchard M, Mignot G, Derangere V, Chalmin F, Chevriaux A, et al. (2013) Chemotherapy-triggered cathepsin B release in myeloid-derived suppressor cells activates the Nlrp3 inflammasome and promotes tumor growth. Nat Med 19: 57-64.

  56. Ramakrishnan R, Gabrilovich DI (2011) Mechanism of synergistic effect of chemotherapy and immunotherapy of cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 419-423.

  57. Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, et al. (2010) 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 70: 3052-3061.

  58. Kanterman J, Sade-Feldman M, Biton M, Ish-Shalom E, Lasry A, et al. (2014) Adverse immunoregulatory effects of 5FU and CPT11 chemotherapy on myeloid-derived suppressor cells and colorectal cancer outcomes. Cancer Res 74: 6022-6035.

  59. Paduch R, Kandefer-SzerszeA" M, Piersiak T (2010) The importance of release of proinflammatory cytokines, ROS, and NO in different stages of colon carcinoma growth and metastasis after treatment with cytotoxic drugs. Oncol Res 18: 419-436.

  60. Ma C, Kapanadze T, Gamrekelashvili J, Manns MP, Korangy F, et al. (2012) Anti-Gr-1 antibody depletion fails to eliminate hepatic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Leukoc Biol 92: 1199-1206.

  61. Thaci B, Ahmed AU, Ulasov IV, Wainwright DA, Nigam P, et al. (2014) Depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells during interleukin-12 immunogene therapy does not confer a survival advantage in experimental malignant glioma. Cancer Gene Ther 21: 38-44.

  62. Matsuzaki J, Tsuji T, Chamoto K, Takeshima T, Sendo F, et al. (2003) Successful elimination of memory-type CD8+ T cell subsets by the administration of anti-Gr-1 monoclonal antibody in vivo. Cell Immunol 224: 98-105.

  63. Ribechini E, Leenen PJ, Lutz MB (2009) Gr-1 antibody induces STAT signaling, macrophage marker expression and abrogation of myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity in BM cells. Eur J Immunol 39: 3538-3551.

  64. Dalod M, Salazar-Mather TP, Malmgaard L, Lewis C, Asselin-Paturel C, et al. (2002) Interferon alpha/beta and interleukin 12 responses to viral infections: pathways regulating dendritic cell cytokine expression in vivo. J Exp Med 195: 517-528.

  65. Nakano H, Yanagita M, Gunn MD (2001) CD11c(+)B220(+)Gr-1(+) cells in mouse lymph nodes and spleen display characteristics of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Exp Med 194: 1171-1178.

International Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology (ISSN: 2377-4630)
International Journal of Blood Research and Disorders   (ISSN: 2469-5696)
International Journal of Brain Disorders and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5866)
International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-3419)
International Journal of Clinical Cardiology (ISSN: 2469-5696)
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-584X)
Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports (ISSN: 2378-3656)
Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy (ISSN: 2469-5750)
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2377-3634)
Journal of Family Medicine and Disease Prevention (ISSN: 2469-5793)
Journal of Genetics and Genome Research (ISSN: 2378-3648)
Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (ISSN: 2469-5858)
International Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3672)
International Journal of Medical Nano Research (ISSN: 2378-3664)
International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3001)
International Archives of Nursing and Health Care (ISSN: 2469-5823)
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-346X)
International Journal of Oral and Dental Health (ISSN: 2469-5734)
International Journal of Pathology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2469-5807)
International Journal of Pediatric Research (ISSN: 2469-5769)
International Journal of Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine (ISSN: 2378-3516)
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5726)
International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine (ISSN: 2469-5718)
International Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy (ISSN: 2469-570X)
International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice (ISSN: 2378-3397)
Trauma Cases and Reviews (ISSN: 2469-5777)
International Archives of Urology and Complications (ISSN: 2469-5742)
International Journal of Virology and AIDS (ISSN: 2469-567X)
More Journals

Contact Us

ClinMed International Library | Science Resource Online LLC
3511 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19810, USA


Get Email alerts
Creative Commons License
Open Access
by ClinMed International Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at
Copyright © 2017 ClinMed International Library. All Rights Reserved.